[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names

2016-10-10 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-10 15:21, Pattan, Reshma: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > Why not recommend GCC 4.9 and keep the graceful degradation for older > > versions, at least for one more year, even if it is not optimal for newer > > architectures? > > I am ok with the idea, so

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names

2016-10-10 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-28 10:54, Liu, Yong: > Tested-by: Yong Liu > FangFang Wei [...] >Description: Build test on different distributions >Command / instruction: > Verify build pass on listed distributions. > > OS GCCKernel > Ubuntu 16.04

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names

2016-10-10 Thread Pattan, Reshma
Hi Thomas > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 3:26 PM > To: Liu, Yong ; Pattan, Reshma > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel pr

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names

2016-09-02 Thread Pattan, Reshma
Hi, Gentle remainder for review. Thanks, Reshma

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: gcc -march support for intel processors code names

2016-08-22 Thread Reshma Pattan
The GCC 4.9 -march option supports the intel code names for processors, for example -march=silvermont, -march=broadwell. The RTE_MACHINE config flag can be used to pass code name to the compiler as -march flag. Also old gcc versions compatibility code for the intel platform is removed from