2015-04-13 10:52, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio:
> On 09/04/2015 21:34, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 04/09/2015 02:19 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM,
On 09/04/2015 21:34, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 04/09/2015 02:19 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 19:26,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 01:04:52PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-04-13 10:52, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio:
> > On 09/04/2015 21:34, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >> On 04/09/2015 02:19 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015
On 04/09/2015 02:19 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 04/09/2015 02:19 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>
> >>On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> >>>On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed,
2015-04-09 07:19, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> > >On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > >>On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
> > >>Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> > >>
> >
On 09/04/2015 14:33, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-04-09 07:19, Neil Horman:
>> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
>
On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
>> Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
>>
>>> Currently, the target/rules to build combined libraries is different
>>> than the one to build individual
On 09/04/2015 10:06, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
> On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>> On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
>>> Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
>>>
Currently, the target/rules to build combined libraries is
On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
> Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
>
>> Currently, the target/rules to build combined libraries is different
>> than the one to build individual libraries.
>>
>> By removing the combined library option as a build
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:06:47PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
> On 04/09/2015 11:33 AM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> >On 08/04/2015 19:26, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
> >>Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> >>
> >>>Currently, the target/rules to build
Currently, the target/rules to build combined libraries is different
than the one to build individual libraries.
By removing the combined library option as a build configuration option
we simplify the build pocess by having a single point for linking/archiving
libraries in DPDK.
This patch
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 16:07:21 +0100
Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> Currently, the target/rules to build combined libraries is different
> than the one to build individual libraries.
>
> By removing the combined library option as a build configuration option
> we simplify the build pocess by
13 matches
Mail list logo