Another comment is, comment out lcore_socket_id check will influence other
architectures. If possible, I would like to make this change to Power specific.
-Original Message-
From: gowrishankar muthukrishnan [mailto:gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: 2016?8?12? 17:00
To: Chao Zhu
Hi Chao,
I have simplified the approach for this patch in v5.
* Including ppc64le specific changes
* App panic in creating core map only in SMT=off case, so that would be
addressed separately.
Hoping with new patch set v5, your review would be easier.
Regards,
Gowrishankar
On Friday 12
Gowrishankar,
I suggest to set the following value:
n_max_cores_per_socket = 8
n_max_ht_per_core = 8
This will cover most of the Power8 servers.
Any comments?
-Original Message-
From: gowrishankar muthukrishnan [mailto:gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: 2016?8?11? 20:02
To:
On Friday 12 August 2016 03:45 PM, Chao Zhu wrote:
> Another comment is, comment out lcore_socket_id check will influence other
> architectures. If possible, I would like to make this change to Power
> specific.
Hi Chao,
I am revisiting cpu_core_map_init() fn. I realize, all we handle is max
On Friday 12 August 2016 02:14 PM, Chao Zhu wrote:
> Gowrishankar,
>
> I suggest to set the following value:
>
> n_max_cores_per_socket = 8
> n_max_ht_per_core = 8
>
> This will cover most of the Power8 servers.
> Any comments?
Sure Chao. I will include this change in v5. If there are no other
Gowrishankar,
Thanks for the detail.
If my understanding is correct, Power8 has different chips. Some of the
OpenPOWER chips have 8 cores per socket. And the max threads per core is 8.
Should we support this in cpu_core_map_init()?
Here's a dump from the OpenPOWER system.
On Thursday 11 August 2016 03:59 PM, Chao Zhu wrote:
> Gowrishankar,
>
> Thanks for the detail.
> If my understanding is correct, Power8 has different chips. Some of the
> OpenPOWER chips have 8 cores per socket. And the max threads per core is 8.
> Should we support this in cpu_core_map_init()?
Gowrishankar,
Can you give more description about this patch?
Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan [mailto:gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: 2016?8?6? 20:33
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Chao Zhu ; Bruce Richardson
; Konstantin Ananyev
; Thomas Monjalon ;
Hi Chao,
Sure. Please find below one.
This patch fixes ip_pipeline panic in app_init_core_map while preparing cpu
core map in powerpc with SMT off. cpu_core_map_compute_linux currently
prepares
core mapping based on file existence in sysfs ie.
From: gowrishankar
offline lcore would still refer to original core id and this has to
be considered while creating cpu core mask.
Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar
---
config/defconfig_ppc_64-power8-linuxapp-gcc | 3 ---
examples/ip_pipeline/cpu_core_map.c
10 matches
Mail list logo