On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 01:48:01AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:54:33AM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> > >
> > > So, I'd suggest something like following:
> > >
> > > if (is_vdev(..)) {
> > >
> > >
> > > The blocker issue of your suggestion is that we
Hi Yuanhan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:yuanhan.liu at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 12:45 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Xie, Huawei; rich.lane at bigswitch.com; mst at
> redhat.com;
> nakajima.yoshihiro at lab.ntt.co.jp; p.fedin at
Hi Michael,
On 5/13/2016 1:02 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:08:05PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> (2) It's more aligned to previous logic to hide the detail to differentiate
>> modern/legacy device.
> Why is there a need to support legacy interfaces at all? It's a
On 5/13/2016 12:40 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:08:05PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
+static int
+vdev_setup_queue(struct virtio_hw *hw __rte_unused, struct virtqueue *vq)
+{
+ /* Changed to use virtual addr */
+ vq->vq_ring_mem =
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 09:54:33AM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>
> So, I'd suggest something like following:
>
> if (is_vdev(..)) {
>
>
> The blocker issue of your suggestion is that we have no such condition.
>
> Previously, I use dev_type, but as David's comment said:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:08:05PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> (2) It's more aligned to previous logic to hide the detail to differentiate
> modern/legacy device.
Why is there a need to support legacy interfaces at all? It's a container
so if it's in use one can be reasonably sure you have a
Hi yuanhan,
On 5/12/2016 10:12 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:18:34AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
>> +static void
>> +vdev_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw, uint64_t offset,
>> + void *dst, int length)
>> +{
>> +int i;
>> +struct virtio_user_hw
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:08:05PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> >>+static int
> >>+vdev_setup_queue(struct virtio_hw *hw __rte_unused, struct virtqueue *vq)
> >>+{
> >>+ /* Changed to use virtual addr */
> >>+ vq->vq_ring_mem = (phys_addr_t)vq->mz->addr;
> >>+ if (vq->virtio_net_hdr_mz) {
>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 01:18:34AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> +static void
> +vdev_read_dev_config(struct virtio_hw *hw, uint64_t offset,
> + void *dst, int length)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct virtio_user_hw *uhw = (struct virtio_user_hw *)hw->vdev_private;
Unnecessary
This patch implements another new instance of struct virtio_pci_ops to
drive the virtio-user virtual device. Instead of rd/wr ioport or PCI
configuration space, this virtual pci driver will rd/wr the virtual
device struct virtio_user_hw, and when necessary, invokes APIs provided
by device
10 matches
Mail list logo
