On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:20:09PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> Also can someone please review rest of series. This patchset going
>> through multiple revision, Each revision get one / two comment, It
>> would help if I get review comment
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 03:20:09PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Santosh Shukla
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Yuanhan Liu >> linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:48:44PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Yuanhan Liu > linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:50:18AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:43
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Yuanhan Liu
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:50:18AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Yuanhan Liu >>>
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:50:18AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Yuanhan Liu >> linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:44:14AM
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:50:18AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Yuanhan Liu
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:44:14AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> >> Current use-case is virtio: It is used as
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:50:18AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:44:14AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> >> Current use-case is virtio: It is used as io_bar which is first
> >> bar[1]. But implementation is
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:44:14AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> >> +int rte_eal_pci_read_bar(const struct rte_pci_device *device,
> >> + void *buf, size_t len, off_t offset,
> >> + int bar_idx)
> >> +
> >> +{
> >> + const struct rte_intr_handle
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Yuanhan Liu
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:44:14AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>>> >> +int rte_eal_pci_read_bar(const struct rte_pci_device *device,
>>> >> + void *buf, size_t
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:44:14AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> >> +int rte_eal_pci_read_bar(const struct rte_pci_device *device,
>> >> + void *buf, size_t len, off_t offset,
>> >> + int bar_idx)
>>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:51:50PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> Introducing below api for pci bar region rd/wr.
>> Api's are:
>> - rte_eal_pci_read_bar
>> - rte_eal_pci_write_bar
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla
>> ---
>> v5-->v6:
>> -
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Yuanhan Liu
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:44:14AM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>> Current use-case is virtio: It is used as io_bar which is first
>> bar[1]. But implementation is generic, can be used to do rd/wr for
>> other bar index too. Also vfio
Introducing below api for pci bar region rd/wr.
Api's are:
- rte_eal_pci_read_bar
- rte_eal_pci_write_bar
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla
---
v5-->v6:
- update api infor in rte_eal_version.map file
suggested by david manchand.
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal_pci.c | 19
13 matches
Mail list logo
