[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-03-04 Thread Tetsuya Mukawa
On 2016/03/02 11:24, Qiu, Michael wrote: > On 3/1/2016 10:19 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: >> On 2016/03/01 11:00, Qiu, Michael wrote: >>> On 2/26/2016 4:36 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: On 2016/02/26 13:29, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > [...] > > BTW, I have set the frontend mergeable off. > I

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-03-02 Thread Qiu, Michael
On 3/1/2016 10:19 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > On 2016/03/01 11:00, Qiu, Michael wrote: >> On 2/26/2016 4:36 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: >>> On 2016/02/26 13:29, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: [...] BTW, I have set the frontend mergeable off. I have checked below cases. - Case1:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-03-01 Thread Tetsuya Mukawa
On 2016/03/01 11:00, Qiu, Michael wrote: > On 2/26/2016 4:36 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: >> On 2016/02/26 13:29, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: >>> On 2016/02/25 16:51, Qiu, Michael wrote: On 2/24/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > On 2016/02/24 11:45, Qiu, Michael wrote: >> Hi, Tetsuya

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-02-26 Thread Tetsuya Mukawa
On 2016/02/26 13:29, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > On 2016/02/25 16:51, Qiu, Michael wrote: >> On 2/24/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: >>> On 2016/02/24 11:45, Qiu, Michael wrote: Hi, Tetsuya When I applied your v6 patch, I could reach 9.5Mpps with 64B packet. But when

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-02-26 Thread Tetsuya Mukawa
On 2016/02/25 16:51, Qiu, Michael wrote: > On 2/24/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: >> On 2016/02/24 11:45, Qiu, Michael wrote: >>> Hi, Tetsuya >>> >>> When I applied your v6 patch, I could reach 9.5Mpps with 64B packet. >>> >>> But when apply v9 only 8.4 Mpps, could you figure out why has >>>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-02-25 Thread Qiu, Michael
On 2/24/2016 1:10 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > On 2016/02/24 11:45, Qiu, Michael wrote: >> Hi, Tetsuya >> >> When I applied your v6 patch, I could reach 9.5Mpps with 64B packet. >> >> But when apply v9 only 8.4 Mpps, could you figure out why has >> performance drop? > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-02-24 Thread Tetsuya Mukawa
On 2016/02/24 11:45, Qiu, Michael wrote: > Hi, Tetsuya > > When I applied your v6 patch, I could reach 9.5Mpps with 64B packet. > > But when apply v9 only 8.4 Mpps, could you figure out why has > performance drop? Hi Michael, Thanks for checking it. I tried to re-produce it, but I don't see the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-02-24 Thread Qiu, Michael
Hi, Tetsuya When I applied your v6 patch, I could reach 9.5Mpps with 64B packet. But when apply v9 only 8.4 Mpps, could you figure out why has performance drop? Thanks, Michael On 2/9/2016 5:38 PM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > The patch introduces a new PMD. This PMD is implemented as thin wrapper

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/2] Add VHOST PMD

2016-02-09 Thread Tetsuya Mukawa
The patch introduces a new PMD. This PMD is implemented as thin wrapper of librte_vhost. PATCH v9 changes: - Fix a null pointer access issue implemented in v8 patch. PATCH v8 changes: - Manage ether devices list instead of internal structures list. - Remove needless NULL checking. - Replace