I should have replied to this earlier, apologies.
On Sunday 20 November 2016 09:00 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
>> design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> 2016-11-20 16:30, David Marchand:
>> For a first patchset, I would see:
>> - introduce the rte_bus object. In rte_eal_init, for each bus, we call
>> the scan method. Then, for each bus, we find the appropriate
>> rte_driver using the bus
2016-11-20 16:30, David Marchand:
> For a first patchset, I would see:
> - introduce the rte_bus object. In rte_eal_init, for each bus, we call
> the scan method. Then, for each bus, we find the appropriate
> rte_driver using the bus match method then call the probe method. If
> the probe
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Shreyansh Jain
wrote:
> DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
> design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A non-PCI
> device doesn't have a way of being expressed without using hooks started from
> EAL to
On Thursday 17 November 2016 05:25 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> wrote:
>> DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
>> design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A non-PCI
>> device doesn't have a
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Shreyansh Jain
wrote:
> On Thursday 17 November 2016 05:25 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Shreyansh Jain
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
>>> design of device tree (or list)
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:29 AM, Shreyansh Jain
wrote:
> DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
> design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A non-PCI
> device doesn't have a way of being expressed without using hooks started from
> EAL to
DPDK has been inherently a PCI inclined framework. Because of this, the
design of device tree (or list) within DPDK is also PCI inclined. A non-PCI
device doesn't have a way of being expressed without using hooks started from
EAL to PMD.
With this cover letter, some patches are presented which
8 matches
Mail list logo