Hi Helin and PMD maintainers,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:31:05AM +, Zhang, Helin wrote:
> Hi Adrien
>
> Any update on the v1 APIs? We are struggling on that, as we need that for our
> development.
> May I bring another idea to remove the blocking?
> Can we send out the APIs with PMD changes
arguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 7:13 PM
> To: Zhang, Helin
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon; Lu, Wenzhuo
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Generic flow
> director/filtering/classification
> API
>
> Hi Helin,
>
> On Mon, Oct
t longer!
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Adrien Mazarguil
> > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:11 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Cc: Thomas Monjalon
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Generic flow
> >
m: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Adrien Mazarguil
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:11 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Generic flow
> director/filtering/classification
> API
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 08:5
Hi Adrien Mazarguil,
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 4:21 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Generic flow
> director/filtering/classif
Hi Wei,
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 01:47:53AM +, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> Hi Adrien Mazarguil,
> There is a struct rte_flow_action_rss in rte_flow.txt, the member
> rss_conf is a pointer type, is there any convenience in using pointer?
> Why not using struct rte_eth_rss_conf rss_conf type,
drien.mazarguil at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 9:19 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Generic flow
> director/filtering/classification
> API
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:42:53AM +, Zhao1, Wei wrote
Hi Wei,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 09:42:53AM +, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> Hi Adrien Mazarguil,
>
> In your v2 version of rte_flow.txt , there is an action type
> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK, but there is no definition of struct
> rte_flow_action_mark.
> And there is an definition of struct
{
uint32_t id; /**< 32 bit value to return with packets. */
};
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Adrien Mazarguil
> Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 3:33 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2] Gen
On 16-08-19 12:32 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks to many for the positive and constructive feedback I've received so
> far. Here is the updated specification (v0.7) at last.
>
> I've attempted to address as many comments as possible but could not
> process them all just yet. A
Hi All,
Thanks to many for the positive and constructive feedback I've received so
far. Here is the updated specification (v0.7) at last.
I've attempted to address as many comments as possible but could not
process them all just yet. A new section "Future evolutions" has been
added for the
11 matches
Mail list logo
