rocess
>Flow control
>Whitelist
>blacklist
>vlan
>
> Regards,
> Cao Min
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:04 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject
To improve 1G driver performance, consider setting the
>> TX
>> >> WTHRESH value to 4, 8, or 16.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 0 ... rxq=0,0,0
>> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 1 ... rxq=0,1,0
>> >>
=1,0,0
> >> Initializing rx queues on lcore 3 ... rxq=1,1,0
> >>
> >> Checking link status.done
> >> Port 0 Link Up - speed 100 Mbps - full-duplex
> >> Port 1 Link Up - speed 100 Mbps - full-duplex
> >> L3FWD: entering main loop o
id=1
>> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=3 portid=1 rxqueueid=1
>> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 0
>> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=0 portid=0 rxqueueid=0
>> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 2
>> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=2 portid=1 rxqueueid=0
>>
>> Anyway, I'll also try to test
n loop on lcore 3
>> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=1 portid=0 rxqueueid=1
>> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=3 portid=1 rxqueueid=1
>> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 0
>> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=0 portid=0 rxqueueid=0
>> L3FWD: entering main loop on lcore 2
>> L3FWD: -- lcoreid=2 port
Hello.
I'm now using Intel Atom processor C2758 on the DPDK testing machines, but
it seems not working.
Which sample application would be recommended to test the NIC actually
works well with DPDK?
Best regards
Byeong-Gi KIM
>
> From: BYEONG-GI KIM [mailto:kimbyeonggi at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:09 AM
> To: Masaru Oki; De Lara Guarch, Pablo; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor
>
> It works fine with DPDK at least.
>
> The problem i
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of BYEONG-GI KIM
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 7:04 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK supported processor
>
> Hello.
>
> I'm now using Intel Atom processor C2758 o
8 matches
Mail list logo
