o:lasw...@infiniteio.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 3:05 PM
To: Ananyev, Konstantin
Cc: Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How to approach packet TX lockups
Hey Konstantin,
Moving from 1.6r2 to 2.2 is going to be a pretty significant change due to
things like changes in th
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Matt Laswell
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 2:24 PM
> To: Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How to approach packet TX lockups
>
> Yes, we're on
=1.
>
> Though as I understand from your previous mails, you already did that, and
> it didn?t help.
>
> Konstantin
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Matt Laswell [mailto:laswell at infiniteio.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 17, 2015 3:05 PM
> *To:* Ananyev, Konstantin
> *C
t; To: Stephen Hemminger
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How to approach packet TX lockups
> >
> > Yes, we're on 1.6r2. That said, I've tried a number of different values
> > for the thresholds without a lot of luck. Setting
> wthres
Yes, we're on 1.6r2. That said, I've tried a number of different values
for the thresholds without a lot of luck. Setting wthresh/hthresh/pthresh
to 0/0/32 or 0/0/0 doesn't appear to fix things. And, as Matthew
suggested, I'm pretty sure using 0 for the thresholds leads to auto-config
by the
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:31:29PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The DPDK 2.2 driver uses:
> wthresh = 0
> hthresh = 0
> pthresh = 32
Stephen,
I thought the zero values lead to doing the auto-config by the driver itself?
Matthew.
Hey Stephen,
Thanks a lot; that's really useful information. Unfortunately, I'm at a
stage in our release cycle where upgrading to a new version of DPDK isn't
feasible. Any chance you (or others reading this) has a pointer to the
relevant changes? While I can't afford to upgrade DPDK entirely,
Hey Folks,
I sent this to the users email list, but I'm not sure how many people are
actively reading that list at this point. I'm dealing with a situation in
which my application loses the ability to transmit packets out of a port
during times of moderate stress. I'd love to hear suggestions
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:49:15 -0600
Matt Laswell wrote:
> Hey Stephen,
>
> Thanks a lot; that's really useful information. Unfortunately, I'm at a
> stage in our release cycle where upgrading to a new version of DPDK isn't
> feasible. Any chance you (or others reading this) has a pointer to
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:48:35 -0600
Matt Laswell wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> I sent this to the users email list, but I'm not sure how many people are
> actively reading that list at this point. I'm dealing with a situation in
> which my application loses the ability to transmit packets out of a
10 matches
Mail list logo
