[dpdk-dev] memory allocation requirements

2016-05-18 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > After looking at the patches for container support, it appears that > some changes are needed in the memory management: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/32786/focus=32788 > > I think it is time to collect what

[dpdk-dev] memory allocation requirements

2016-04-15 Thread Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
On 15/04/2016 08:12, Olivier Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/14/2016 05:39 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: >>> Just to mention that some evolutions [1] are planned in mempool in >>> 16.07, allowing to populate a mempool with several chunks of memory, >>> and still ensuring that the objects are

[dpdk-dev] memory allocation requirements

2016-04-15 Thread Olivier Matz
Hi, On 04/14/2016 05:39 PM, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote: >> Just to mention that some evolutions [1] are planned in mempool in >> 16.07, allowing to populate a mempool with several chunks of memory, >> and still ensuring that the objects are physically contiguous. It >> completely removes the

[dpdk-dev] memory allocation requirements

2016-04-14 Thread Olivier MATZ
Hi, On 04/13/2016 06:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > After looking at the patches for container support, it appears that > some changes are needed in the memory management: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/32786/focus=32788 > > I think it is time to collect what are the

[dpdk-dev] memory allocation requirements

2016-04-14 Thread Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
On 14/04/2016 15:46, Olivier MATZ wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/13/2016 06:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> After looking at the patches for container support, it appears that >> some changes are needed in the memory management: >>

[dpdk-dev] memory allocation requirements

2016-04-14 Thread Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
On 13/04/2016 17:03, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > After looking at the patches for container support, it appears that > some changes are needed in the memory management: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/32786/focus=32788 +1 > I think it is time to collect what are the needs

[dpdk-dev] memory allocation requirements

2016-04-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
After looking at the patches for container support, it appears that some changes are needed in the memory management: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/32786/focus=32788 I think it is time to collect what are the needs and expectations of the DPDK memory allocator. The goal

[dpdk-dev] memory allocation requirements

2016-04-13 Thread Wiles, Keith
>After looking at the patches for container support, it appears that >some changes are needed in the memory management: >http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.networking.dpdk.devel/32786/focus=32788 > >I think it is time to collect what are the needs and expectations of >the DPDK memory allocator.