[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-18 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Burakov, Anatoly > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 4:01 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: vfio detection > > Hi Bruce, > > > > > I have a number of NIC ports which were working correctly yesterday > > > > and are bound correctly to the

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-18 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
Hi Bruce, > > > I have a number of NIC ports which were working correctly yesterday > > > and are bound correctly to the igb_uio driver - and I want to keep > > > using them through the igb_uio driver for now, not vfio. However, > > > whenever I run a dpdk application today, I find that the vfio k

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Bruce, your log files have been automatically removed on the mailing list. It's simpler to put logs in the email body. -- Thomas

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:42 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: Burakov, Anatoly; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vfio detection > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:38:38PM

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Richardson, Bruce > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:29 AM > To: Burakov, Anatoly; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vfio detection > > > -Original Message- > > F

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Yes, so I see. Resending with log in body. > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:36 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vfio detection > > Bruce,

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Burakov, Anatoly > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:40 AM > To: Richardson, Bruce; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: vfio detection > > Hi Bruce, > > > I have a number of NIC ports which were working correctly yesterday and are > > bound correctly to the igb_uio dr

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Neil Horman
t; Bruce > > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:29 AM > > > > To: Burakov, Anatoly; dev at dpdk.org > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] vfio detection > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: Burakov, An

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:38:38PM +, Richardson, Bruce wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Richardson, Bruce > > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 9:29 AM > > To: Burakov, Anatoly; dev at dpdk.org > >

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-17 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
Hi Bruce, > I have a number of NIC ports which were working correctly yesterday and are > bound correctly to the igb_uio driver - and I want to keep using them > through the igb_uio driver for now, not vfio. However, whenever I run a > dpdk application today, I find that the vfio kernel module is

[dpdk-dev] vfio detection

2014-06-16 Thread Richardson, Bruce
Hi all, Now that vfio support has merged into the dpdk.org mainline, I'm seeing a number of issues with running applications, and I'm hoping someone can explain the observed behaviour. I have a number of NIC ports which were working correctly yesterday and are bound correctly to the igb_uio dr