Just a forward to complete the records.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: License headers inside Javadoc comments
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 15:38:29 +0200
From: James Turton
To: P. Ottlinger , d...@creadur.apache.org
CC: dev
Thanks Phil.
Here's some
Thanks Paul
I don't know how to configure the license plugin. But, I do suspect a
Python file (or shell script) could make a one-time pass over the files to
standardize headers into whatever format the team chooses. Only the first
line of each file would change.
I put more information in my
Thanks Phil.
Here's some background [1] which comes from before I was involved with
Drill. What they wanted was for the license header checker to accept, in
.java files,
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
* or more contributor license agreements. See the
Hi James,
thanks for reaching out!
Am 26.01.24 um 08:21 schrieb James Turton:
I'd like to ask about a feature to prevent RAT from allowing license
headers to appear inside Javadoc comments (/**) while still requiring
them in Java comments (/*) in .java files. Currently the Drill project
Hi James,
For some reason, Drill started with the license headers in Javadoc
comments. The (weak) explanation I got was that we never generate Javadoc,
so it didn't really matter. Later, we started converting the headers to
regular comments when convenient.
If we were to generate Javadoc, having
