[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-25 Thread jinfengni
Github user jinfengni commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 It's fine to have example in a follow-up PR. I was trying to see if I can use new operator/sub-operator test framework for the schema change task I'm doing. That requires to work with one

[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-25 Thread paul-rogers
Github user paul-rogers commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 One of the key reasons for creating tests is that they show how to use an API. In this case, the associated tests show how to use the row set abstractions to create a schema, populate a row set

[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-20 Thread paul-rogers
Github user paul-rogers commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 Revised the commit header. Note that the commit messages also identifies that this PR is dependent on DRILL-5323, and so this PR must be committed after DRILL-5323. Sorry for the

[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-20 Thread paul-rogers
Github user paul-rogers commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 Please see the initial comment which identifies that this PR depends on several others. Two have been done, only DRILL-5323 remains. Please commit DRILL-5323 first, then this one. Note

[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-20 Thread sudheeshkatkam
Github user sudheeshkatkam commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 I am confused by your comment. Which should be committed first, 5318 or 5323? Your comments says 5318, but the commit message for 5318 and the fact that 5318 is based on 5323 suggests 5323

[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-20 Thread paul-rogers
Github user paul-rogers commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 Rebased onto DRILL-5318 so that this branch includes the DRILL-5318 code that this PR depends upon, as well as the additional code required for this PR. Fixed the merge errors that caused the

[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-19 Thread sudheeshkatkam
Github user sudheeshkatkam commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 This does not compile. Please fix the errors and squash the commits into one. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-19 Thread sudheeshkatkam
Github user sudheeshkatkam commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] drill issue #788: DRILL-5318: Sub-operator test fixture

2017-04-03 Thread sohami
Github user sohami commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/788 Thanks for the changes. LGTM. +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and