Hi Eyal,
Thanks for the contrib, I'll have some time to start reviewing in the next
week or two. It seems like a cool feature with interest from users, so I'd
lean towards keeping it open for review/merge.
Best,
Jon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:29 PM Eyal Yurman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This pr is
Hi,
This pr is waiting for a few months for review:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/6430
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6320
So far only one reviewer (@b-slim) was kind enough to start looking at it.
Since this is an contrib extension, it is not really blocking
Hi Eyal,
I'll take a look too. For some reason I missed this when you first posted
it, but it is very interesting work, and looks like it could be part of a
path to supporting generic windowed aggregations in Druid SQL. (Moving
average, cumulative sum, and so on)
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 7:07 PM
Hi all,
I wrote a proposal for consolidated segment metadata management a few weeks
ago. Since it's also a huge and incompatible change, I would like to get
more attention from others.
As described in the proposal, Druid currently stores segment metadata in
two places: metadata store and deep
Sorry for delayed review. I'll take a look once the 0.14.0 release is
finished.
Jihoon
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 3:58 PM Eyal Yurman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A few months ago I worked on open sourcing an extension we've been using
> internally for a couple of years.
>
>
Hi,
A few months ago I worked on open sourcing an extension we've been using
internally for a couple of years.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/6430
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6320
This has been upvoted by a few community users, so I was happy to put in
the
sorry, yes, that is the information I meant. that Feature Freeze is in its
final stages
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:21 PM David Glasser
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:45 AM Charles Allen
> wrote:
> >* *0.14 *release is in final stages, any blockers for 0.14 should be
> called out to the
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:45 AM Charles Allen
wrote:
>* *0.14 *release is in final stages, any blockers for 0.14 should be called
>out to the dev list.
Can you clarify this? I don't think a 0.14 branch has been cut yet —
things that land on master soon are likely to make it in, right?
--dave
> I disagree with Roman's suggestions. If a PR has enough votes, we should
> trust the committers approving the PR and move forward.
FWIW, I do think it's good to be courteous and give other reviewers a day
or two to either follow up on a review or decide to leave the decision to
the reviewers
Interesting proposal - I commented on the issue. It sounds like a good idea.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 7:22 AM Roman Leventov wrote:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6942
>
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6942
11 matches
Mail list logo
