Aha! mystery solved.
.npmrc was pointing to an internal npm registry which couldn't provide the
packages.
Thanks Adam!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:32 AM Adam Peck wrote:
> Do you have any registry overrides in a .npmrc file?
> https://docs.npmjs.com/files/npmrc
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at
Do you have any registry overrides in a .npmrc file?
https://docs.npmjs.com/files/npmrc
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:21 AM Gian Merlino wrote:
> I haven't seen something like that before. The package version 4.2.6 is
> here on NPM: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@types/react-copy-to-clipboard
>
>
Hi, compaction shouldn't change the query result in this case.
Are you using stream ingestion method such as Kafka or Kinesis by any
chance? If so, could it be that new data has inserted into the same
interval after compaction?
Jihoon
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 7:44 PM scoffi Michaeal
wrote:
>
I haven't seen something like that before. The package version 4.2.6 is
here on NPM: https://www.npmjs.com/package/@types/react-copy-to-clipboard
Is it possible your build environment is blocking NPM?
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:43 AM Eyal Yurman
wrote:
> The mvn command was actually:
> mvn
The mvn command was actually:
mvn clean install -Pdist -DskipTests, from IntelliJ
(It shouldn't matter though)
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:39 AM Eyal Yurman
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone encountered the following error?
>
> mvn clean install -PskipTests
>
> [INFO] --- frontend-maven-plugin:1.6:npm
Hi,
Has anyone encountered the following error?
mvn clean install -PskipTests
[INFO] --- frontend-maven-plugin:1.6:npm (npm-install) @ druid-console ---
[INFO] Running 'npm ci' in
/Users/eyurman14/git/yurmix-incubating-druid/web-console
[ERROR] npm ERR! code ETARGET
[ERROR] npm ERR! notarget No
I've created the following PR based on this discussion and the document
that I've started to prepare last year:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17EEKT6fih9Dd5NfXjBoECcKbVp1eOB2vb3jKqTF9pPc/edit
.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/pull/7991
I believe having agreed upon development
Hey Daniel & Radu,
Yes, we use sha512 checksums for our artifacts. I think the confusion is
probably with the copy on the "closer.cgi" download page, which has an
example command that refers specifically to SHA256:
> Hashes can be calculated using GPG:
> % gpg --print-md SHA256 downloaded_file
>
On 7/11/19 3:52 PM, Radu Sebastian wrote:
hello,
I have downloaded apache-druid from the mirror page and found a mismatch
when comparing sha256 check sum
oficial download page:
On 2019/07/10 16:52:21, Gian Merlino wrote:
> Following our discussion on the dev mailing list (
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/68fcc3d2fc66c7f559e2c9dd02478d17f195565fecdb07ed53bc965e@%3Cdev.druid.apache.org%3E),
> I would like to call a vote for Apache Druid graduating to a top
10 matches
Mail list logo
