Hi Slim,
since all our codes have been imported into Apache, we can start this now.
How's it going with this? Would you let us know what's your plan?
Jihoon
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:56 PM Gian Merlino wrote:
> > you are sure about this? thought the donation paper work is signed right?
>
> Not
> you are sure about this? thought the donation paper work is signed right?
Not yet as far as I know; last I heard was a week or so ago.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Slim Bouguerra
wrote:
>
> > On Apr 24, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
> >
> > Do you mean the license headers?
>
> Ye
> On Apr 24, 2018, at 1:18 PM, Gian Merlino wrote:
>
> Do you mean the license headers?
Yes, did quick run and was complaining first about our headers and also some of
the other files without any headers.
> Those, I think, we shouldn't change until
> the code is imported into Apache.
you ar
Do you mean the license headers? Those, I think, we shouldn't change until
the code is imported into Apache.
If it's possible to use Rat to audit dependency licenses without looking at
the license headers of our own files, that would still be useful at this
point.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:57 PM
I Think the first step to use RAT is to reformat all the Druid code licenses.
Any idea if this can be done now or we need some legal work to be done?
On 2018/04/20 17:52:46, Slim Bouguerra wrote:
> As Suggested above, RAT is used as a first filter that does most of the
> checking but it is not
I can do this. I'll make an issue for this in Github and raise a PR.
Jihoon
2018년 4월 20일 (금) 오후 12:30, Gian Merlino 님이 작성:
> Does anyone have experience with RAT (https://creadur.apache.org/rat/) and
> a willingness to do a PR to set it up for us? I think we can do this even
> before migrating s
Does anyone have experience with RAT (https://creadur.apache.org/rat/) and
a willingness to do a PR to set it up for us? I think we can do this even
before migrating sources to Apache.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Slim Bouguerra
wrote:
> As Suggested above, RAT is used as a first filter tha
As Suggested above, RAT is used as a first filter that does most of the
checking but it is not 100% enough.
The mvn site plugin is used to collect list of dependencies but it is not
enough as well.
They manually edit/create the Licenses/Notice files. It is done by
hand/a_human to avoid any glitch t
The main tool to use is Apache RAT. Definitely use that.
One of the hardest tasks is getting the contents of LICENSE and NOTICE right.
That is a manual task I’m afraid.
Julian
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 08:34, Gian Merlino wrote:
>
> Hi Slim,
>
> Do you know if ORC & Hive use this tool as part
Hi Slim,
Do you know if ORC & Hive use this tool as part of their release process?
And if it's considered a good tool by itself for verifying we meet all of
the Apache licensing requirements, or if we'll need something else too?
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Slim Bouguerra wrote:
> One of th
One of the question last dev synch was about the generation of dependency
licenses.
Some projects (ORC and Hive) use the maven site plugin that can generates
reports with all the dependencies and licenses details.
I have run it on Druid and this is how it looks for Druid Api Module.
cmd
mvn projec
11 matches
Mail list logo
