> > > > > sosyalmedya.oguz...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > I think second option would be better. Many people use
>> spark
>> > > for
>> > > > > batch
>> > >
; spark
> > > for
> > > > > batch
> > > > > > > operations with isolated clusters. Me and my friends will
> > > taking time
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > t
t; > can
> > > > > > write our aims, requirements and flows easily.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2020/02/26 13:26:13, itai yaffe
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hey,
> > > > &
wing this thread in Druid
> user group
> > > (
> > > > > > >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.google.com%2Fforum%2F%23!topic%2Fdruid-user%2FFqAuDGc-rUMdata=02%7C01%7Crmordani%40vmware.com%7C98a7d3
TB8%2Fp1581452302483600data=02%7C01%7Crmordani%40vmware.com%7Ce1c4b7ca140f4eefb11808d7c13d7ad1%7Cb39138ca3cee4b4aa4d6cd83d9dd62f0%7C0%7C0%7C637190342111876048sdata=cYAEldtu1R8k0BuFoPty4%2BkNtI47gP12W3W4O%2BlRGgc%3Dreserved=0),
I'd
> > like
> > > > to start discussing the options o
On 2020/02/26 13:26:13, itai yaffe wrote:
> > > > > > Hey,
> > > > > > Per Gian's proposal, and following this thread in Druid user group
> > (
> > > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/druid-user/FqAuDGc-rUM)
>
> > > > Per Gian's proposal, and following this thread in Druid user group
> (
> > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/druid-user/FqAuDGc-rUM)
> and
> > > this
> > > > > thread in Druid Slack channel (
> > > > > https://the-
oogle.com/forum/#!topic/druid-user/FqAuDGc-rUM) and
> > this
> > > > thread in Druid Slack channel (
> > > > https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CJ8D1JTB8/p1581452302483600), I'd
> > like
> > > > to start discussing the options of having Spark-based ingest
thread in Druid user group (
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/druid-user/FqAuDGc-rUM) and
> this
> > > thread in Druid Slack channel (
> > > https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CJ8D1JTB8/p1581452302483600), I'd
> like
> > > to start disc
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/druid-user/FqAuDGc-rUM) and this
> > thread in Druid Slack channel (
> > https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CJ8D1JTB8/p1581452302483600), I'd like
> > to start discussing the options of having Spark-based ingestion into Druid.
>
thread in Druid user group (
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/druid-user/FqAuDGc-rUM) and this
> > thread in Druid Slack channel (
> > https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CJ8D1JTB8/p1581452302483600), I'd
> like
> > to start discussing the options of having Spa
ns of having Spark-based ingestion into Druid.
>
> There's already an old project (https://github.com/metamx/druid-spark-batch)
> for that, so perhaps we can use that as a starting point.
>
> The thread on Slack suggested 2 approaches:
>
>1. *Simply replacing the Ha
581452302483600), I'd like
> to start discussing the options of having Spark-based ingestion into Druid.
>
> There's already an old project (https://github.com/metamx/druid-spark-batch)
> for that, so perhaps we can use that as a starting point.
>
> The thread on Slack suggested
like
> to start discussing the options of having Spark-based ingestion into Druid.
>
> There's already an old project (https://github.com/metamx/druid-spark-batch)
> for that, so perhaps we can use that as a starting point.
>
> The thread on Slack suggested 2 approaches:
>
>1.
r/FqAuDGc-rUM) and this
> thread in Druid Slack channel (
> https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CJ8D1JTB8/p1581452302483600), I'd like
> to start discussing the options of having Spark-based ingestion into Druid.
>
> There's already an old project (
> https://github.com/metamx/druid-
Spark-based ingestion into Druid.
There's already an old project (https://github.com/metamx/druid-spark-batch)
for that, so perhaps we can use that as a starting point.
The thread on Slack suggested 2 approaches:
1. *Simply replacing the Hadoop MapReduce ingestion task* - having a
Spark batch
16 matches
Mail list logo
