+1 for proposal template.
Do we also need to clarify the process that goes along with the proposals?
(It seems clear to me we've reached consensus in wanting a proposal
process, but less clear if we have a clear picture of or have reached
consensus on the process itself). Things like when voting
Sure, I can see the value of putting it in the template to encourage
thinking about it. Sounds good to me.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 2:47 PM Jonathan Wei wrote:
> That structure sounds good:
> - expanding rejected alternatives to a broader rationale section sounds
> good
> - I like "operational
I think we should clarify the process too. Might I suggest,
1) Add a GitHub issue template with proposal headers and some description
of what each section should be, so people can fill them in easily.
2) Suggest that for any change that would need a design review per
http://druid.io/community/,
