[jira] [Resolved] (FALCON-1395) Update GraphDb when cluster entity is edited.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Balu Vellanki resolved FALCON-1395. --- Resolution: Implemented Implemented as part of FALCON-1085 > Update GraphDb when cluster

[jira] [Updated] (FALCON-1085) Allow cluster entities to be updated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Balu Vellanki updated FALCON-1085: -- Attachment: FALCON-1085.patch > Allow cluster entities to be updated >

[jira] [Commented] (FALCON-1085) Allow cluster entities to be updated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15273342#comment-15273342 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FALCON-1085: GitHub user bvellanki opened a pull request:

[GitHub] falcon pull request: FALCON-1085 Support Cluster entity updates in...

GitHub user bvellanki opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/falcon/pull/127 FALCON-1085 Support Cluster entity updates in Falcon Server Added basic documentation, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1937 will contain detailed documentation. You can merge this

[jira] [Commented] (FALCON-1937) Update documentation with ClusterUpdate.twiki

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15273330#comment-15273330 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FALCON-1937: Github user bvellanki closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] falcon pull request: Falcon 1085 Allow cluster entities to be upda...

Github user bvellanki closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/falcon/pull/126 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (FALCON-1937) Update documentation with ClusterUpdate.twiki

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15273327#comment-15273327 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FALCON-1937: GitHub user bvellanki opened a pull request:

[GitHub] falcon pull request: Falcon 1085 Allow cluster entities to be upda...

GitHub user bvellanki opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/falcon/pull/126 Falcon 1085 Allow cluster entities to be updated in Falcon Server Basic documentation is updated. Detailed documentation will be added as part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1937

[jira] [Created] (FALCON-1937) Update documentation with ClusterUpdate.twiki

Balu Vellanki created FALCON-1937: - Summary: Update documentation with ClusterUpdate.twiki Key: FALCON-1937 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1937 Project: Falcon Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (FALCON-1932) Extension CLI should support common options

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15273273#comment-15273273 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FALCON-1932: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

[GitHub] falcon pull request: FALCON-1932 Extension CLI should support comm...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/falcon/pull/124 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[jira] [Commented] (FALCON-1936) Extensions related files are not available in $FALCON_HOM/extensions/ directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15272789#comment-15272789 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FALCON-1936: Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

Re: Falcon On MapR

Hi Pavan, Can you please check https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1620 is it related ? Can you please try suggested approaches ? On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Pavan Nadakarni wrote: > Hello Srikanth, > > Our nodes were running openjdk version "1.8.0_65"