hi;
+1
Regards
Pierre
Le mer 18 avr. 2018 19:37, Jan Willem Janssen a
écrit :
> On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 10:44 +0200, Karl Pauls wrote:
> > This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> > successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-
> > clearance
> > sort
Hi Christian
That's interesting. Can you enlight a bit on the external dependency required
by the codebase ?
Regards
JB
Le 17 avr. 2018 à 12:09, à 12:09, Christian Schneider
a écrit:
>Dear Felix community,
>
>during the last weeks Andrei Dulvac and I worked on a small framework
>to
>check if
Hi Jan,
It is an interesting approach. Determining whether or not the framework
> is in a useable state is a rather difficult problem for dynamic
> systems. The problem obviously being that when a bundle appears to be
> active, it does not necessarily imply that its services are ready for
> duty.
Hi,
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 10:02 +0200, Christian Schneider wrote:
> Dear Felix community,
>
> during the last weeks Andrei Dulvac and I worked on a small framework
> to
> check if an OSGi based system is fully up.
>
> Our work originated in testing sling modules and whole sling
> instances. We
>
On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 10:44 +0200, Karl Pauls wrote:
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
> successful I will follow-up with the incubator to get the ip-
> clearance
> sorted-out.
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the contribution into Felix
> [ ] -1
+1
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 1:44 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
>
> I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
> contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
> Raymond Auge has died down by now and we should bring it to a vote.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
Le 18 avr. 2018 à 13:20, à 13:20, Carsten Ziegeler a
écrit:
>+1
>
>
>Karl Pauls wrote
>> I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
>> contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
>> Raymond Auge has died down by now and we s
+1 (non-binding)
François
Le 18/04/2018 à 12:44, Karl Pauls a écrit :
> I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
> contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
> Raymond Auge has died down by now and we should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is a
+1
Karl Pauls wrote
> I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
> contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
> Raymond Auge has died down by now and we should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vot
+1
regards,
Karl
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
> contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
> Raymond Auge has died down by now and we should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is a
+1
David
On 18 April 2018 at 11:44, Karl Pauls wrote:
> I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
> contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
> Raymond Auge has died down by now and we should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is about officially
+1 nonbinding
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
> contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
> Raymond Auge has died down by now and we should bring it to a vote.
>
> This vote is about
I think the discussion of the "Logback integration with OSGi Log 1.4"
contribution ( https://github.com/rotty3000/osgi.to.logback) by
Raymond Auge has died down by now and we should bring it to a vote.
This vote is about officially accepting the donation. If the vote is
successful I will follow-up
13 matches
Mail list logo
