glimmerveen commented on a change in pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#discussion_r412465731
##
File path:
scr/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/scr/impl/manager/DependencyManager.java
##
@@ -2283,8 +2283,8 @@ else if (
djencks commented on a change in pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#discussion_r412465282
##
File path:
scr/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/scr/impl/BundleComponentActivator.java
##
@@ -98,133 +98,82 @@
private static class ListenerInfo
glimmerveen commented on a change in pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#discussion_r412444967
##
File path:
scr/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/scr/impl/BundleComponentActivator.java
##
@@ -98,133 +98,82 @@
private static class
djencks commented on issue #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#issuecomment-617384334
Trying to remember the distant past….
I think that the problem this whole thing was designed to solve was that
it’s possible to have several references to the same service, even
glimmerveen commented on a change in pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#discussion_r412444967
##
File path:
scr/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/scr/impl/BundleComponentActivator.java
##
@@ -98,133 +98,82 @@
private static class
tjwatson commented on a change in pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#discussion_r412440777
##
File path:
scr/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/scr/impl/BundleComponentActivator.java
##
@@ -98,133 +98,82 @@
private static class ListenerInfo
glimmerveen commented on issue #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#issuecomment-617373529
> I have some requested changes. I also would like to see some tests that
verify that the listener hooks now have the expected information.
Thanks for your feedback, I will
glimmerveen commented on a change in pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#discussion_r412434960
##
File path:
scr/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/scr/impl/BundleComponentActivator.java
##
@@ -98,133 +98,82 @@
private static class
glimmerveen commented on a change in pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#discussion_r412428375
##
File path:
scr/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/scr/impl/BundleComponentActivator.java
##
@@ -98,133 +98,82 @@
private static class
tjwatson commented on a change in pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19#discussion_r412404198
##
File path:
scr/src/main/java/org/apache/felix/scr/impl/BundleComponentActivator.java
##
@@ -98,133 +98,82 @@
private static class ListenerInfo
Hi Robert,
it sounds like a reasonable generic solution to me - lets see what
others think but just to make sure: I assume you'd be willing to
maintain it, right?
regards,
Karl
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 2:25 PM Robert Munteanu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on collecting startup metrics
Hi,
Healthcheck can be a place.
Karaf Decanter can be another option as well.
Regards
JB
> Le 21 avr. 2020 à 14:25, Robert Munteanu a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on collecting startup metrics for OSGi
> applications. I am interested in finding potentials for optimising
>
Amit Mondal created FELIX-6265:
--
Summary: Replacement of Quartz Scheduler with lightweight cron
scheduler
Key: FELIX-6265
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6265
Project: Felix
Hi,
I have been working on collecting startup metrics for OSGi
applications. I am interested in finding potentials for optimising
startup time, so created a set of bundles that record:
- total startup time
- bundles that are slow to start
- OSGi services that are restarted during startup
I
Hello Georg,
Thanks for the implementation, looks good! I took it for a spin and for
my scenario it works as expected.
In addition to that. I have some notes that you may find useful.
1. api build fails due to the baselining check -
org.apache.felix.hc.api.execution: Version increase required;
glimmerveen commented on issue #16:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/16#issuecomment-617116932
@jbonofre could you have a look at this PR? I believe it would both allow
the current repackaging in Karaf and allow the bundle to be used as is, thus
increasing the usability of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088578#comment-17088578
]
Arnoud Glimmerveen commented on FELIX-6161:
---
[~cziegeler] I have applied the patch to the
glimmerveen opened a new pull request #19:
URL: https://github.com/apache/felix-dev/pull/19
This PR contains the patch already attached to PISTE-6161, but now applied
on the current state of the felix-dev repository.
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088537#comment-17088537
]
Carsten Ziegeler commented on FELIX-6161:
-
[~arnoud] As we have moved to git, could you maybe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088381#comment-17088381
]
Veselin commented on FELIX-6203:
It's the one linked above in "Issue links" [GitHub Pull Request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088377#comment-17088377
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on FELIX-6203:
[~markov] I can't find any PR
> Make bundleplugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-6203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088357#comment-17088357
]
Veselin commented on FELIX-6203:
I'm not sure if I have to write this here since there is no reaction on
22 matches
Mail list logo
