Re: Support for OSGi

2008-02-01 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 01/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2008 1:19 PM, Oberhuber, Martin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Niall / Stuart, > > > > thanks for your answers. It looks like the usage patterns > > of OSGi in the Apache and Eclipse communities are just > > a bit diffe

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-02-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Feb 1, 2008 4:07 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 01/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Would it be possible to add bnd 0.0.236 to the maven repo so I can try > > out these new features with Felix's bundle plugin? > > > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-02-01 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 01/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would it be possible to add bnd 0.0.236 to the maven repo so I can try > out these new features with Felix's bundle plugin? > > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/biz/aQute/bndlib/ FYI, this is already in progress - Carlos Sanchez is sortin

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-02-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
] On Behalf > > Of Stuart McCulloch > > Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Jänner 2008 16:53 > > To: dev@felix.apache.org > > Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Orbit Developer discussion > > Subject: Re: Support for OSGi > > > > > On 31/01/2008, Oberhuber, Martin &

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-02-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
But for me, it also shows that in the current stage > > it looks like the OSGi manifest still needs to be > > written by hand and not auto-generated. > > > > Anyways, if there is a plan to make a downloadable > > release of any commons packages with OSGi info > > ad

RE: Support for OSGi

2008-02-01 Thread Oberhuber, Martin
ECTED] On Behalf > Of Stuart McCulloch > Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Jänner 2008 16:53 > To: dev@felix.apache.org > Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Orbit Developer discussion > Subject: Re: Support for OSGi > > On 31/01/2008, Oberhuber, Martin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-31 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 31/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > These isn't much OSGi knowledge here in commons - we're doing this at > the request of the Apache Felix project so that they don't have to > re-package our artifacts for OSGi. So I'm hoping that someone from > Felix will pick up your sec

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-31 Thread Stuart McCulloch
well enough to craft an OSGi manifest yourself) Anyways, if there is a plan to make a downloadable > release of any commons packages with OSGi info > added, I'd like to know. > > Thanks, > -- > Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River > Target Managemen

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-31 Thread Niall Pemberton
pache.org/commons/CommonsOsgi Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated. Niall > Thanks, > -- > Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River > Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member > http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm > > > > > > -Original M

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-31 Thread Peter Kriens
SGi info added, I'd like to know. Thanks, -- Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 20

RE: Support for OSGi

2008-01-31 Thread Oberhuber, Martin
d River Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm > -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:30 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Cc: dev@felix.apache.org > Subject:

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-29 Thread Niall Pemberton
I have created a JIRA ticket for the changes to the commons-parent pom to add the bundle plugin: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-23 I have also tested out the plugin by generating the jars/manifest for all but three components: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/commons-osgi/

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 12/01/2008, David Leangen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Stuart, > > I don't know how this renders in your mail client, but it's a real eye > sore > in plain text and a pain to read... > > Just thought I'd let you know. (Guess I'm still in the dark ages using > plain > text...) it renders ve

RE: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread David Leangen
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Stuart McCulloch > Sent: 12 January 2008 14:00 > To: dev@felix.apache.org > Subject: Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi] > > > On 11/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 11/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 11, 2008 9:50 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On 11/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 10, 2008 5:51 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 11, 2008 9:50 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 10, 2008 5:51 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > O

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Jan 11, 2008 9:09 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stuart McCulloch wrote: Yes - and the way the plugin does this is by passing the complete classpath. But then you're back to having to tell Bnd exactly what you want to export and what you want to keep p

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 11/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2008 5:51 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 10, 2008 2:56 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > wrote: > > > > On

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 10, 2008 5:51 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 10, 2008 2:56 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 11, 2008 9:09 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > > > Yes - and the way the plugin does this is by passing the complete classpath. > > But then you're back to having to tell Bnd exactly what you want to export > > and what you want to keep private...

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-11 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Stuart McCulloch wrote: Yes - and the way the plugin does this is by passing the complete classpath. But then you're back to having to tell Bnd exactly what you want to export and what you want to keep private... Yes, and I think this is the better (and in the end easier) way to go; for a quic

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-10 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2008 2:56 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2008 5:35 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > On 09/01/2

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-10 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 10, 2008 2:56 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Jan 9, 2008 5:35 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > On 09/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 20

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-09 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 10/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2008 5:35 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 09/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 9, 2008 6:11 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > Hi Carsten / Ni

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Jan 9, 2008 5:35 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 09/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 9, 2008 6:11 AM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi Carsten / Niall, > > > > > > I've mocked up a quick patch and attached it to > > > htt

Re: Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-08 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 09/01/2008, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Forwarding to the Felix list. > > Carsten > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Dec 28, 2007 12:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bund

Problems with bundle plugin [Fwd: Re: Support for OSGi]

2008-01-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Forwarding to the Felix list. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Begin Message --- On Dec 28, 2007 12:35 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > in the meantime Stuart fixed the problem with the maven bundleplugin, so > I think we can give it a test drive :) > > A

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-31 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 31 December 2007 14:57, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > I'm sorry but I'm not completely following.  What problems does this   > create?  How is it counter-productive. Commons-logging is not designed for a) OSGi environment with classes loaded and unloaded in runtime. b) Unifying Commons-logg

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-30 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Dec 30, 2007, at 10:10 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Thursday 20 December 2007 03:28, simon wrote: If you provide patches, I'm happy to apply them for commons-logging and commons-digester. Please do not do this for commons-logging. Pax Logging provides the commons-logging API, and hooks

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-30 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Thursday 20 December 2007 03:28, simon wrote: > If you provide patches, I'm happy to apply them for commons-logging and > commons-digester. Please do not do this for commons-logging. Pax Logging provides the commons-logging API, and hooks into a unified logging framework specifically designed

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-20 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Thanks for the very positive response so far! Great! I'll come up with some patches for some of the commons projects; there is a minor problem as the current commons parent pom defines the manifest entries, but I think that we can come up with a solution for this. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [E

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 20/12/2007, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have a mixed bag of build systems here at commons. Until recently > we were pretty much maven1, with the odd ant/maven1 mixture. A few > components have m2 builds that have been used in anger and recently we > added m2 builds for all

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread Torsten Curdt
In general I think it's a good idea. Happy to help and apply patches. cheers -- Torsten It would be great if some of the projects here could add these meta data as part of their next release. This will make the life of all projects using OSGi much much easier. So if you're interested in he

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Dec 19, 2007 2:38 PM, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > the products of commons are highly used throughout many projects. > > It would be great, if the projects here at Apche Commons could help > those projects that are using OSGi. > > OSGi is based around the concept of a bu

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread Tom Schindl
What a great idea this would be nice for me as RCP developer because currently I have to create my own bundles from the commons-packages. Tom Carsten Ziegeler schrieb: Hi, the products of commons are highly used throughout many projects. It would be great, if the projects here at Apche Commo

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread simon
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 15:38 +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hi, > > the products of commons are highly used throughout many projects. > > It would be great, if the projects here at Apche Commons could help > those projects that are using OSGi. If you provide patches, I'm happy to apply them fo

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
nicolas de loof wrote: > Could such support be added using maven-osgi ? > (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-osgi/) This artifact contains some utility code - in fact it is used by the Felix bundleplugin http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/bundleplugin So, you need t