On 10/4/16 04:13 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
2016-10-04 9:16 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert :
Hi Guillaume,
Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
without
2016-10-04 9:16 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert :
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
> Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
> without gogo-jline...
>
No, the dependency is
Hi Guillaume,
Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without?
Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing
without gogo-jline...
On the version number, if the refactoring was just a change of internal
implementation details without any API
I've downgraded the requirement or the gogo-runtime to java 7.
That's not really possible for the gogo-jline bundle which has a dependency
on jline requiring java 8 atm.
Given the amount of change, I think it would be better to bump the
gogo-runtime bundle version. Given it's currently at 0.17,
I already tested the new gogo shell and apart from some minor issues
that I found and reported it worked really well.
So I would be happy to see a release soon.
Christian
On 28.09.2016 00:02, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'd like to release the big changes pending in gogo runtime and gogo jline
I think it would be great to finally get the improved gogo shell released
in Felix. Personally I don't really need Java 7 support, but it might be
good to allow this to enable wider adoption. If we support Java 7 we might
be able to replace the default shell in the Felix Framework download with
I think it's worth to stay with Java8.
Regards
JB
On 09/28/2016 10:00 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a requirement on java 8.
The gogo-runtime currently needs java 8, but mostly for syntactic sugar
(lambda + streams) and it can be downgraded to a java
Hi,
TBH, Java 7 is EOL since about a year. Is it really necessary to block
improvements on the gogo shell because of old Java versions for ever?
just my 2 cents.
regards, Achim
2016-09-28 10:00 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet :
> So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a
So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a requirement on java 8.
The gogo-runtime currently needs java 8, but mostly for syntactic sugar
(lambda + streams) and it can be downgraded to a java 7 requirement (it
can't go down to java 6 due to the use of the NIO api with Paths and
Channels).
I
I don’t recall too well…. IIRC line requires java 8. Does the rest of gogo now
also require java 8?
thanks
david jencks
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 3:02 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> I'd like to release the big changes pending in gogo runtime and gogo jline
> bundles.
> Given
10 matches
Mail list logo