Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

On 10/4/16 04:13 , Guillaume Nodet wrote: 2016-10-04 9:16 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert : Hi Guillaume, Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without? Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing without

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

2016-10-04 9:16 GMT+02:00 David Bosschaert : > Hi Guillaume, > > Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without? > Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing > without gogo-jline... > No, the dependency is

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

Hi Guillaume, Does gogo-runtime have a dependency on gogo-jline or will it work without? Just trying to understand what Java 7 users will be able to do/are missing without gogo-jline... On the version number, if the refactoring was just a change of internal implementation details without any API

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

I've downgraded the requirement or the gogo-runtime to java 7. That's not really possible for the gogo-jline bundle which has a dependency on jline requiring java 8 atm. Given the amount of change, I think it would be better to bump the gogo-runtime bundle version. Given it's currently at 0.17,

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

I already tested the new gogo shell and apart from some minor issues that I found and reported it worked really well. So I would be happy to see a release soon. Christian On 28.09.2016 00:02, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I'd like to release the big changes pending in gogo runtime and gogo jline

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

I think it would be great to finally get the improved gogo shell released in Felix. Personally I don't really need Java 7 support, but it might be good to allow this to enable wider adoption. If we support Java 7 we might be able to replace the default shell in the Felix Framework download with

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

I think it's worth to stay with Java8. Regards JB On 09/28/2016 10:00 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a requirement on java 8. The gogo-runtime currently needs java 8, but mostly for syntactic sugar (lambda + streams) and it can be downgraded to a java

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

Hi, TBH, Java 7 is EOL since about a year. Is it really necessary to block improvements on the gogo shell because of old Java versions for ever? just my 2 cents. regards, Achim 2016-09-28 10:00 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet : > So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

So the gogo-jline depends on jline3, which has a requirement on java 8. The gogo-runtime currently needs java 8, but mostly for syntactic sugar (lambda + streams) and it can be downgraded to a java 7 requirement (it can't go down to java 6 due to the use of the NIO api with Paths and Channels). I

Re: [DISCUSS] Release new gogo runtime / jline bundles

I don’t recall too well…. IIRC line requires java 8. Does the rest of gogo now also require java 8? thanks david jencks > On Sep 27, 2016, at 3:02 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I'd like to release the big changes pending in gogo runtime and gogo jline > bundles. > Given