Re: [ Discussion ] ORM Migration

Hi Devs, *Glancing over > https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/20584 > , I'm > unclear if it concludes that Spring Framework actually formally completely > dropped support for OpenJPA, or if with OpenJPA 3.0.0

Re: [ Discussion ] ORM Migration

Hi All, Apache Syncope had to write a plugin to integrate their solution with Spring 5. https://github.com/apache/syncope/commit/17a8eb5d99a84608a64927b00e7d9352d640517e Looks like the Spring team will support just 2 ORMs officially moving forward: Hibernate and EclipseLink. Good thing Eclipse

Re: [ Discussion ] ORM Migration

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 8:43 AM Isaac Kamga wrote: > Hello devs, > > Just thought I should remind the community about why these migrations are > necessary. > > The rationale behind migrating the ORM from Hibernate is that Hibernate > ORM's license[1] falls under the ASF's Category X[1]. > > Not

Re: [ Discussion ] ORM Migration

Hello I will give my own opinions, by the way I don't work for any company mentioned here :) For short: *I will keep using using Hibernate because it has advantages over the others ORM listed. ** * TL/TR The value of the core are the transactions recorded with confidence in a

Re: [ Discussion ] ORM Migration

Oh and one more thing, re. "3. Bugs and compatibility issues with other libraries. I have first-hand experience with it and it's not pleasant." I suspect that https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/607 may help with (some of?) those kinds of problems? It was a mistake to initially, when Mifos X

Re: [ Discussion ] ORM Migration

Folks, I'm not entirely convinced yet that we have strong enough reasons to justify the effort switching from OpenJPA to e.g. EclipseLink. Glancing over https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/issues/20584, I'm unclear if it concludes that Spring Framework actually formally

[ Discussion ] ORM Migration

eaks* with DataNucleusJPA" Thanks, Márti On 2019. 07. 05. 18:10, Ed Cable wrote: Are you able to add your thoughts on this discussion? Ed -- Forwarded message - From: *Awasum Yannick* mailto:awa...@apache.org>> Date: Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 11:48 PM Subject: Re: [ Discussio

Re: [ Discussion ] ORM Migration

Hi Graham, +1 EclipseLink as its supported by spring 4.x and latest spring versions and compatible with Apache license. Our upgrade to Spring 5.x or 6.x will be easier. We dont want to build and maintain our own integration of OpenJPA with Spring 5 or 6 in the future. On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at

Re: [ Discussion ] ORM Migration

Hi! Good job starting the discussion. Based on your arguments I also see EclipseLink as the best solution. I also found one more argument for using EclipseLink - it supports multi-tenancy: https://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/documentation/2.7/solutions/multitenancy.htm#CHDBJCJA Juhan Kontakt

[ Discussion ] ORM Migration

Hello Devs, I have started this thread to discuss the JPA implementation to adopt as we work towards making Fineract CN Apache compliant as well as to ensure that we are all aligned as a community. I am currently working on the migration to OpenJPA as my GSoC project. However, a number of red