Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

[Gaurav Saini]

Hello Myrle,

I would love to see the slides, Please share so we can get more information
about Fineract CN.

Thanks
Gaurav

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:

> Hey Fineract Community,
>
> This is just an FYI for the community:
>
> Last week I was in Hamburg at the solutions.hamburg conference.  I did
> a presentation on microservices and versioning based on the Fineract
> CN example.  This was the same presentation I did for ApacheCon last
> year but with some added detail.  That presentation had a pretty good
> audience.
>
> I also shared a presentation with Justin McLean on the Apache
> Incubator using our experiences with Apache Fineract as a case study.
> We had a very small but very interested audience.
>
> I attended presentations on Microservices, the Apache Way, and
> Apache's approach to IP.
>
> If anyone is interested in the slides for my talks, or for the talks I
> attended let me know: I'd be happy to share them with you.
>
> Greets,
> Myrle
>



-- 
Regards,
*Gaurav Saini*

Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

[courage angeh]

Hi Myrle.

I am interested in the slides. Please share it with me.

On Sep 14, 2017 8:18 AM, "Myrle Krantz"  wrote:

Hey Fineract Community,

This is just an FYI for the community:

Last week I was in Hamburg at the solutions.hamburg conference.  I did
a presentation on microservices and versioning based on the Fineract
CN example.  This was the same presentation I did for ApacheCon last
year but with some added detail.  That presentation had a pretty good
audience.

I also shared a presentation with Justin McLean on the Apache
Incubator using our experiences with Apache Fineract as a case study.
We had a very small but very interested audience.

I attended presentations on Microservices, the Apache Way, and
Apache's approach to IP.

If anyone is interested in the slides for my talks, or for the talks I
attended let me know: I'd be happy to share them with you.

Greets,
Myrle

Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

[Mohit Bajoria]

+1

Regards
Mohit

On 14 September 2017 at 12:53, Gaurav Saini  wrote:

> Hello Myrle,
>
> I would love to see the slides, Please share so we can get more information
> about Fineract CN.
>
> Thanks
> Gaurav
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:
>
> > Hey Fineract Community,
> >
> > This is just an FYI for the community:
> >
> > Last week I was in Hamburg at the solutions.hamburg conference.  I did
> > a presentation on microservices and versioning based on the Fineract
> > CN example.  This was the same presentation I did for ApacheCon last
> > year but with some added detail.  That presentation had a pretty good
> > audience.
> >
> > I also shared a presentation with Justin McLean on the Apache
> > Incubator using our experiences with Apache Fineract as a case study.
> > We had a very small but very interested audience.
> >
> > I attended presentations on Microservices, the Apache Way, and
> > Apache's approach to IP.
> >
> > If anyone is interested in the slides for my talks, or for the talks I
> > attended let me know: I'd be happy to share them with you.
> >
> > Greets,
> > Myrle
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> *Gaurav Saini*
>



-- 

*Regards*
*Mohit Kumar Bajoria*
*http://mohitbajoria.com *

FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

[Myrle Krantz]

Hey Fineract Community,

This is just an FYI for the community:

Last week I was in Hamburg at the solutions.hamburg conference.  I did
a presentation on microservices and versioning based on the Fineract
CN example.  This was the same presentation I did for ApacheCon last
year but with some added detail.  That presentation had a pretty good
audience.

I also shared a presentation with Justin McLean on the Apache
Incubator using our experiences with Apache Fineract as a case study.
We had a very small but very interested audience.

I attended presentations on Microservices, the Apache Way, and
Apache's approach to IP.

If anyone is interested in the slides for my talks, or for the talks I
attended let me know: I'd be happy to share them with you.

Greets,
Myrle

Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

[Myrle Krantz]

Oh my,

I wasn't expecting a response as immediate and enthusiastic as this. : o)

Here's the microservices presentation:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qn5GyCk30nom5LuYXPjuQF5gdIEwrLie2SpIyo-dMuc/edit?usp=sharing

And here's the incubator presentation:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vJ-dLFY_68gbv5sO8omJpFJkP8if2IVn4JT5S1NcEwA/edit?usp=sharing
(Fineract content begins on slide 35)


Regards,
Myrle


On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Mohit Bajoria  wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> Mohit
>
> On 14 September 2017 at 12:53, Gaurav Saini  wrote:
>
>> Hello Myrle,
>>
>> I would love to see the slides, Please share so we can get more information
>> about Fineract CN.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Gaurav
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:
>>
>> > Hey Fineract Community,
>> >
>> > This is just an FYI for the community:
>> >
>> > Last week I was in Hamburg at the solutions.hamburg conference.  I did
>> > a presentation on microservices and versioning based on the Fineract
>> > CN example.  This was the same presentation I did for ApacheCon last
>> > year but with some added detail.  That presentation had a pretty good
>> > audience.
>> >
>> > I also shared a presentation with Justin McLean on the Apache
>> > Incubator using our experiences with Apache Fineract as a case study.
>> > We had a very small but very interested audience.
>> >
>> > I attended presentations on Microservices, the Apache Way, and
>> > Apache's approach to IP.
>> >
>> > If anyone is interested in the slides for my talks, or for the talks I
>> > attended let me know: I'd be happy to share them with you.
>> >
>> > Greets,
>> > Myrle
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> *Gaurav Saini*
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Regards*
> *Mohit Kumar Bajoria*
> *http://mohitbajoria.com *

Re: FYI: Apache Fineract at solutions.hamburg last week

[Ippez Robert]

+1 and thanks for sharing

On 14 Sep 2017 10:31, "Myrle Krantz"  wrote:

> Oh my,
>
> I wasn't expecting a response as immediate and enthusiastic as this. : o)
>
> Here's the microservices presentation:
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qn5GyCk30nom5LuYXPjuQF5gdIEwr
> Lie2SpIyo-dMuc/edit?usp=sharing
>
> And here's the incubator presentation:
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vJ-dLFY_
> 68gbv5sO8omJpFJkP8if2IVn4JT5S1NcEwA/edit?usp=sharing
> (Fineract content begins on slide 35)
>
>
> Regards,
> Myrle
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Mohit Bajoria 
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Regards
> > Mohit
> >
> > On 14 September 2017 at 12:53, Gaurav Saini 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Myrle,
> >>
> >> I would love to see the slides, Please share so we can get more
> information
> >> about Fineract CN.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Gaurav
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Myrle Krantz 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hey Fineract Community,
> >> >
> >> > This is just an FYI for the community:
> >> >
> >> > Last week I was in Hamburg at the solutions.hamburg conference.  I did
> >> > a presentation on microservices and versioning based on the Fineract
> >> > CN example.  This was the same presentation I did for ApacheCon last
> >> > year but with some added detail.  That presentation had a pretty good
> >> > audience.
> >> >
> >> > I also shared a presentation with Justin McLean on the Apache
> >> > Incubator using our experiences with Apache Fineract as a case study.
> >> > We had a very small but very interested audience.
> >> >
> >> > I attended presentations on Microservices, the Apache Way, and
> >> > Apache's approach to IP.
> >> >
> >> > If anyone is interested in the slides for my talks, or for the talks I
> >> > attended let me know: I'd be happy to share them with you.
> >> >
> >> > Greets,
> >> > Myrle
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> *Gaurav Saini*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Regards*
> > *Mohit Kumar Bajoria*
> > *http://mohitbajoria.com *
>

Issue Apache Fineract-FINERACT-419

[Gurinder Kaur]

Hi Team,

While going through this ticket I found it's working in my local
machine. The description is given as follows in the ticket:-

1. Create a client with Legal Form=Entity and assign this client a
value from the Main Business Line. Save.
2. Edit this client and try to remove Main Business Line (assign back
to --Select Main Business Line). Save.
3. Edit again and observe Main Business Line is still assigned.

But, in my case the Main Business Line (assign back to --Select Main
Business Line).



Thanks & Regards
-- 
Gurinder Kaur
Blog:https://gurinder95.wordpress.com
GitHub:https://github.com/gurinderkaur

"If you have a deep desire to move forward, a way will be prepared for you"

[jira] [Assigned] (FINERACT-517) "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.

[Shaik Nazeer Hussain (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shaik Nazeer Hussain reassigned FINERACT-517:
-

Assignee: Santosh Math  (was: Markus Geiss)

> "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial 
> payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.
> -
>
> Key: FINERACT-517
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Santosh Math
>  Labels: p1
>
> When there is less repayment is made(Ex;  500 in stead of 1000), it is needed 
> to run the scheduler job but running this scheduler job has no effect and 
> interest is not getting recalculated .
> 1. Create a loan product (Monthly repayment) with Interest Recalculation 
> enabled. (Reduced EMI Amount, no compounding is required)
> 2.  Disburse loan on January 1, 2017 whose first repayment date will be 01 
> February 2017.
> 3.  Consider repayment amount is 800, but you make repayment only 400 on 01 
> February 2017.
> 4. Run Scheduler job "Recalculate Interest for Loans'
> >When you come back to the loan account, you see the same repayment schedule  
> >before running the scheduler job.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-517) "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.

[Shaik Nazeer Hussain (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16166207#comment-16166207
 ] 

Shaik Nazeer Hussain commented on FINERACT-517:
---

when we do payment for 01 February 2017 , interest is getting updated for 
remaining installments.

So after that if you Run Scheduler job "Recalculate Interest for Loans' there 
would be no effect because it is already updated schedules.

> "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial 
> payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.
> -
>
> Key: FINERACT-517
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Markus Geiss
>  Labels: p1
>
> When there is less repayment is made(Ex;  500 in stead of 1000), it is needed 
> to run the scheduler job but running this scheduler job has no effect and 
> interest is not getting recalculated .
> 1. Create a loan product (Monthly repayment) with Interest Recalculation 
> enabled. (Reduced EMI Amount, no compounding is required)
> 2.  Disburse loan on January 1, 2017 whose first repayment date will be 01 
> February 2017.
> 3.  Consider repayment amount is 800, but you make repayment only 400 on 01 
> February 2017.
> 4. Run Scheduler job "Recalculate Interest for Loans'
> >When you come back to the loan account, you see the same repayment schedule  
> >before running the scheduler job.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

[jira] [Resolved] (FINERACT-517) "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.

[Shaik Nazeer Hussain (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shaik Nazeer Hussain resolved FINERACT-517.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem

Hi Santosh, can you re verify this issue please.  

> "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial 
> payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.
> -
>
> Key: FINERACT-517
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Santosh Math
>  Labels: p1
>
> When there is less repayment is made(Ex;  500 in stead of 1000), it is needed 
> to run the scheduler job but running this scheduler job has no effect and 
> interest is not getting recalculated .
> 1. Create a loan product (Monthly repayment) with Interest Recalculation 
> enabled. (Reduced EMI Amount, no compounding is required)
> 2.  Disburse loan on January 1, 2017 whose first repayment date will be 01 
> February 2017.
> 3.  Consider repayment amount is 800, but you make repayment only 400 on 01 
> February 2017.
> 4. Run Scheduler job "Recalculate Interest for Loans'
> >When you come back to the loan account, you see the same repayment schedule  
> >before running the scheduler job.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Re: PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR LIST

[Sander van der Heyden]

@Both: Just e-mail to dev-*un*subscr...@fineract.apache.org. This is the
same process you've followed when you subscribed, but with the 2 letters in
bold being the difference.



Sander van der Heyden

CTO Musoni Services




Mobile (NL): +31 (0)6 14239505
Skype: s.vdheyden
Website: musonisystem.com
Follow us on Twitter!  
Postal address: Hillegomstraat 12-14, office 0.09, 1058 LS, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands

On 14 September 2017 at 17:03, Nithin Reddy  wrote:

> STOP
>
> On 14-Sep-2017 7:56 pm, "Erin Sobkow"  wrote:
>
> > Hi:
> >
> >
> >
> > I asked once to be taken off your contact list a few weeks ago and I am
> > still receiving emails from people daily.  Please remove me from your
> email
> > list.  Thank-you.
> >
> >
> >
> > *Erin Sobkow, BA Kin, RMT*
> >
> > *Community Consultant*
> >
> > *Parkland Valley Sport, Culture & Recreation District*
> >
> > *[image: PVSCRDistrict]*
> >
> > *Box 263, Yorkton, SK  S3N 2V7*
> >
> > *Phone: (306) 786-6585*
> >
> > *Fax: (306) 782-0474*
> >
> > *Email:**  esob...@parklandvalley.ca *
> >
> > *Website:**  www.parklandvalley.ca *
> >
> >
> >
> > If you no longer wish to receive electronic messages from Parkland Valley
> > Sport, Culture & Recreation District please reply with the word '*STOP*'.
> >
> >
> >
> > [image: Facebook]
> >  Culture-Recreation-District/191987360884224>[image:
> > twitter]
> >  %26+Recreation+District>
> >
> >
> >
> > *Together...building healthy communities through sport, culture and
> > recreation*
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: Upping our truck factor

[vishwas]

Hello All,

>>> 1.) Are you doing something that only you are doing, and that you
>>> believe should be shared more widely?

No

>>> 2.) What are the reasons why you aren't doing one of the activities on
>>> our "bottleneck" list?

I am currently focusing on a few other things I really want to do and would not 
be able to take up time consuming activity like reviewing pull requests.

I would be happy to help with moderating lists though.

Regards,
Vishwas



> On Aug 31, 2017, at 9:05 AM, Gaurav Saini  wrote:
> 
> Hello Myrle,
> 
> Sorry for delayed reply. Below are my answers
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Fineracters,
>> 
>> There are 9 PMC members who have not responded (8 if we excuse
>> Nazeer).  As a reminder, the questions are:
>> 
>> 1.) Are you doing something that only you are doing, and that you
>> believe should be shared more widely?
>> 
> 
> No
> 
> 
>> 2.) What are the reasons why you aren't merging PRs or helping out
>> with releases?
>> 
>> 
> My main expertise was on frontend mainly, but recently after looking in
> Fineract CN I am really interested to get started with Fineract CN.
> 
> Also, I saw that new Fineract CN has a frontend project based on
> typescript, material so I am really to interested to contribute on that
> right now also.
> 
> Thanks
> Gaurav
> 
> 
>> I would appreciate a response.  You might also want to say, "I'm too
>> busy right now", or "I'm waiting for Fineract CN", or "I've lost
>> confidence that the project can help me achieve my goals".  If that's
>> the case, then it is important information too.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Myrle Krantz
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Myrle Krantz  wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> We have an awesome community.  In particular, we've been very good at
>>> responding to people's request for help getting Fineract working for
>>> their use cases.  But we also have some things we need to work on.
>>> 
>>> Specifically we have several bottlenecks in our community:
>>> 
>>> 1.) Only Nazeer is merging PR's.
>>> 2.) Only Nazeer is serving as a release manager.
>>> 3.) Only Myrle is moderating the lists (apart from the mentors who
>>> will eventually step out).
>>> 
>>> This is called "having a truck factor of one", because if a truck hits
>>> one of us (or if we win the lottery and decide never to do anything
>>> for Fineract again), then the entire project would fail (1).  This is
>>> already causing us problems in some areas: for example our PR's are
>>> backed up
>>> 
>>> I'm not writing this to lecture anyone.  I know there are reasons for
>>> the way things are.  That doesn't mean we should just accept it
>>> though.
>>> 
>>> Let's start by improving our understanding of the problem.  Would each
>>> committer please say:
>>> 1.) Are you doing something that only you are doing, and that you
>>> believe should be shared more widely?
>>> 2.) What are the reasons why you aren't doing one of the activities on
>>> our "bottleneck" list?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I'll start:
>>> 1.) List moderation.
>>> 2.) I'm not merging PR's because I'm not sufficiently familiar with
>>> the current generation Fineract code to feel comfortable evaluating
>>> those PR's.  I'm not serving as a release manager, because I don't
>>> have enough insight into when we are release-ready, and because there
>>> are several pieces of technical knowledge I'd need to acquire to be a
>>> release manager which I don't yet have.  For these reasons, I've
>>> chosen to focus my energies on Fineract CN instead.
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Myrle Krantz
>>> 
>>> P.S. After we have a list of causes, I'll initiate a round of
>>> discussion about how we can resolve the causes.
>>> 
>>> 1.) http://www.agileadvice.com/2005/05/15/agilemanagement/truck-factor/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> *Gaurav Saini*

Re: PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR LIST

[Nithin Reddy]

STOP

On 14-Sep-2017 7:56 pm, "Erin Sobkow"  wrote:

> Hi:
>
>
>
> I asked once to be taken off your contact list a few weeks ago and I am
> still receiving emails from people daily.  Please remove me from your email
> list.  Thank-you.
>
>
>
> *Erin Sobkow, BA Kin, RMT*
>
> *Community Consultant*
>
> *Parkland Valley Sport, Culture & Recreation District*
>
> *[image: PVSCRDistrict]*
>
> *Box 263, Yorkton, SK  S3N 2V7*
>
> *Phone: (306) 786-6585*
>
> *Fax: (306) 782-0474*
>
> *Email:**  esob...@parklandvalley.ca *
>
> *Website:**  www.parklandvalley.ca *
>
>
>
> If you no longer wish to receive electronic messages from Parkland Valley
> Sport, Culture & Recreation District please reply with the word '*STOP*'.
>
>
>
> [image: Facebook]
> [image:
> twitter]
> 
>
>
>
> *Together...building healthy communities through sport, culture and
> recreation*
>
>
>

[jira] [Commented] (FINERACT-517) "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.

[Santosh Math (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167311#comment-16167311
 ] 

Santosh Math commented on FINERACT-517:
---

[~nazeer1100126], if scheduler job ' Recalculate Interest for Loans' has no 
effect if we make more repayment or less repayment and interest is being 
recalculated without the need for running the job, is it good to remove that 
job so that others dont' get confusion?


> "Recalculate Interest for Loans" scheduler job has no effect when partial 
> payment is made with less amount on scheduled date.
> -
>
> Key: FINERACT-517
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-517
> Project: Apache Fineract
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Loan
>Reporter: Santosh Math
>Assignee: Santosh Math
>  Labels: p1
>
> When there is less repayment is made(Ex;  500 in stead of 1000), it is needed 
> to run the scheduler job but running this scheduler job has no effect and 
> interest is not getting recalculated .
> 1. Create a loan product (Monthly repayment) with Interest Recalculation 
> enabled. (Reduced EMI Amount, no compounding is required)
> 2.  Disburse loan on January 1, 2017 whose first repayment date will be 01 
> February 2017.
> 3.  Consider repayment amount is 800, but you make repayment only 400 on 01 
> February 2017.
> 4. Run Scheduler job "Recalculate Interest for Loans'
> >When you come back to the loan account, you see the same repayment schedule  
> >before running the scheduler job.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

PLEASE TAKE ME OFF YOUR LIST

[Erin Sobkow]

Hi:

 

I asked once to be taken off your contact list a few weeks ago and I am
still receiving emails from people daily.  Please remove me from your email
list.  Thank-you.

 

Erin Sobkow, BA Kin, RMT

Community Consultant

Parkland Valley Sport, Culture & Recreation District



Box 263, Yorkton, SK  S3N 2V7

Phone: (306) 786-6585

Fax: (306) 782-0474

Email:    esob...@parklandvalley.ca

Website:    www.parklandvalley.ca

 

If you no longer wish to receive electronic messages from Parkland Valley
Sport, Culture & Recreation District please reply with the word 'STOP'.

 

 

  

 

Together...building healthy communities through sport, culture and
recreation

 

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

[Ed Cable]

Nazeer,

I'm replying on this thread here so we can give a response to Nathan about
when PPI will be available.

Santosh - had you had a chance to make the issue per Nazeer's email on
August 3?

Thanks,

Ed

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:

> Nazeer,
>
> Can you confirm with Raunak that you've resolved his blockers. On our call
> this morning, he was still facing some issues but I'm not sure if he had
> used the latest code with all of the fixes.
>
> Ed
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Raunak Sett 
> wrote:
>
>> @Nazeer also here is some implementation details documented by Markus
>> https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOSX/Socia
>> l+Performance+Management+Framework
>> 
>>  also
>> can we discuss it further, I'm still having some troubles retrieving the
>> scorecard entries for a client.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Raunak,
>>>
>>> Thanks for sending this along again.
>>>
>>> Nazeer, the results of the survey should be their score which measures
>>> if they are above or below the poverty line and their movement out of
>>> poverty via an improving score can be tracked over time.
>>>
>>> Please watch this video to learn more: http://www.progressoutof
>>> poverty.org/ppi-overview-video
>>>
>>> Viewing the old PPI spec might be helpful too.
>>> https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOS/PPI+Functional+Spec
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Raunak Sett 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 @Nazeer, It was nice talking to you on call. I guess we will be able to
 do it. I'm pasting a part of the thread with Ed and Nathan for the context
 of what we need on the SPM framework. Check for [ ] for updates on the
 points.

 1) Build out the UI for creating survey from available PPI scorecard [
 Needs discussion ]

 Right now we should simply have to run the PPI-uploader tool on your
 instance and it will upload the PPIs that have been added as XMLs. This
 should work fine right now (apart from having to make some slight
 modifications to the PPI-uploader based on the recent changes to resources
 with switch to fineract from mifos x.  [ Resolved Already ]
 2) Capture/record surveys from a given entity in the web app

 This is currently available from the UI (you can test it out at
 https://demo.openmf.org (mifos/password) by navigating to any client,
 clicking more dropdown and then survey. You can then select the survey from
 the dropdown and enter responses. We do have some work that needs to be
 done to ensure the lookup tables are being linked to the scorecards and
 scores are being properly tabulated. [ Resolved Already]

 3) View recorded surveys from the web app

 This still needs to be built out. @Raunak - is this something you could
 take up? [ @Ed We can do this now for a particular survey for a given
 client ]

 4) Interface to create new surveys from scratch via the UI [ Already
 Done, Needs testing and modifications ]


 On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Shaik Nazeer <
 nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote:

> Hi Ed,
>
>
>
> What is actual requirement on this score cards? After submitting the
> data, just return the list of score cards? Is there any view we need to
> implement to see this scores?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nazeer
>
> *From:* Nazeer Shaik [mailto:nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com]
> *Sent:* 03 August 2017 17:25
> *To:* Raunak Sett; Santosh Math
> *Cc:* Ed Cable; Dev; Mifos software development; Adi Raju
> *Subject:* Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker
>
>
>
> Hi Raunak,
>
>
>
> I have analyzed this implementation found there is an issue with this.
> We need to modify this implementation.
>
> Santosh can you create a jira issue for tracking purpose please.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Nazeer
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Raunak Sett 
> wrote:
>
> Hello Nazeer,
>
> I don't get any exception log, I'm getting '204 No Content' from the
> server. Nothing is coming as a response from the server.
>
> I've used the ppi uploader to add a survey.
>
> The Philippines Survey can be found at https://demo.openmf.org/fin
> eract-provider/api/v1/surveys/10
>
> It does have a lookup table as well which is required.
> https://demo.openmf.org/fineract-provider/api/v1/s
> urveys/10/lookuptables
>
> But when I create a scorecard entry I don't get any response from the
> server. So I feel there is an issue in creating the scorecard entry which
> is silently failing. That is why there are no scorecard entries 

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

[Santosh Math]

Hi Ed,

Yes , There was an issue, it's fixed and Nazeer sent PR almost 21 days ago
here:

https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/406

He had been expecting some one else should review his PR but no one did it.

Nazeer would merge all the PRs by today evening and update the servers by
tomorrow evening.

Regards
Santosh


On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:

> Nazeer,
>
> I'm replying on this thread here so we can give a response to Nathan about
> when PPI will be available.
>
> Santosh - had you had a chance to make the issue per Nazeer's email on
> August 3?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>
>> Nazeer,
>>
>> Can you confirm with Raunak that you've resolved his blockers. On our
>> call this morning, he was still facing some issues but I'm not sure if he
>> had used the latest code with all of the fixes.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Raunak Sett 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> @Nazeer also here is some implementation details documented by Markus
>>> https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOSX/Socia
>>> l+Performance+Management+Framework
>>> 
>>>  also
>>> can we discuss it further, I'm still having some troubles retrieving the
>>> scorecard entries for a client.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Raunak,

 Thanks for sending this along again.

 Nazeer, the results of the survey should be their score which measures
 if they are above or below the poverty line and their movement out of
 poverty via an improving score can be tracked over time.

 Please watch this video to learn more: http://www.progressoutof
 poverty.org/ppi-overview-video

 Viewing the old PPI spec might be helpful too.
 https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOS/PPI+Functional+Spec



 On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Raunak Sett 
 wrote:

> @Nazeer, It was nice talking to you on call. I guess we will be able
> to do it. I'm pasting a part of the thread with Ed and Nathan for the
> context of what we need on the SPM framework. Check for [ ] for updates on
> the points.
>
> 1) Build out the UI for creating survey from available PPI scorecard
> [ Needs discussion ]
>
> Right now we should simply have to run the PPI-uploader tool on your
> instance and it will upload the PPIs that have been added as XMLs. This
> should work fine right now (apart from having to make some slight
> modifications to the PPI-uploader based on the recent changes to resources
> with switch to fineract from mifos x.  [ Resolved Already ]
> 2) Capture/record surveys from a given entity in the web app
>
> This is currently available from the UI (you can test it out at
> https://demo.openmf.org (mifos/password) by navigating to any client,
> clicking more dropdown and then survey. You can then select the survey 
> from
> the dropdown and enter responses. We do have some work that needs to be
> done to ensure the lookup tables are being linked to the scorecards and
> scores are being properly tabulated. [ Resolved Already]
>
> 3) View recorded surveys from the web app
>
> This still needs to be built out. @Raunak - is this something you
> could take up? [ @Ed We can do this now for a particular survey for a 
> given
> client ]
>
> 4) Interface to create new surveys from scratch via the UI [ Already
> Done, Needs testing and modifications ]
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Shaik Nazeer <
> nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>>
>>
>> What is actual requirement on this score cards? After submitting the
>> data, just return the list of score cards? Is there any view we need to
>> implement to see this scores?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nazeer
>>
>> *From:* Nazeer Shaik [mailto:nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com]
>> *Sent:* 03 August 2017 17:25
>> *To:* Raunak Sett; Santosh Math
>> *Cc:* Ed Cable; Dev; Mifos software development; Adi Raju
>> *Subject:* Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Raunak,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have analyzed this implementation found there is an issue with
>> this. We need to modify this implementation.
>>
>> Santosh can you create a jira issue for tracking purpose please.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nazeer
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Raunak Sett 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Nazeer,
>>
>> I don't get any exception log, I'm getting '204 No Content' from the
>> server. Nothing is coming as a response from the server.
>>

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

[Ed Cable]

Oh that is great it was fixed.

Raunak, with that blocker addressed - what remains to get survey responses
properly stored? Was this it?

It sounds like we have all 4 points that Nathan needed met, no?

Ed

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Santosh Math <
sant...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote:

> Hi Ed,
>
> Yes , There was an issue, it's fixed and Nazeer sent PR almost 21 days ago
> here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/406
>
> He had been expecting some one else should review his PR but no one did it.
>
> Nazeer would merge all the PRs by today evening and update the servers by
> tomorrow evening.
>
> Regards
> Santosh
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>
>> Nazeer,
>>
>> I'm replying on this thread here so we can give a response to Nathan
>> about when PPI will be available.
>>
>> Santosh - had you had a chance to make the issue per Nazeer's email on
>> August 3?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>>
>>> Nazeer,
>>>
>>> Can you confirm with Raunak that you've resolved his blockers. On our
>>> call this morning, he was still facing some issues but I'm not sure if he
>>> had used the latest code with all of the fixes.
>>>
>>> Ed
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Raunak Sett 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 @Nazeer also here is some implementation details documented by Markus
 https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOSX/Socia
 l+Performance+Management+Framework
 
  also
 can we discuss it further, I'm still having some troubles retrieving the
 scorecard entries for a client.

 On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:

> Hi Raunak,
>
> Thanks for sending this along again.
>
> Nazeer, the results of the survey should be their score which measures
> if they are above or below the poverty line and their movement out of
> poverty via an improving score can be tracked over time.
>
> Please watch this video to learn more: http://www.progressoutof
> poverty.org/ppi-overview-video
>
> Viewing the old PPI spec might be helpful too.
> https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOS/PPI+Functional+Spec
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Raunak Sett 
> wrote:
>
>> @Nazeer, It was nice talking to you on call. I guess we will be able
>> to do it. I'm pasting a part of the thread with Ed and Nathan for the
>> context of what we need on the SPM framework. Check for [ ] for updates 
>> on
>> the points.
>>
>> 1) Build out the UI for creating survey from available PPI scorecard
>> [ Needs discussion ]
>>
>> Right now we should simply have to run the PPI-uploader tool on your
>> instance and it will upload the PPIs that have been added as XMLs. This
>> should work fine right now (apart from having to make some slight
>> modifications to the PPI-uploader based on the recent changes to 
>> resources
>> with switch to fineract from mifos x.  [ Resolved Already ]
>> 2) Capture/record surveys from a given entity in the web app
>>
>> This is currently available from the UI (you can test it out at
>> https://demo.openmf.org (mifos/password) by navigating to any
>> client, clicking more dropdown and then survey. You can then select the
>> survey from the dropdown and enter responses. We do have some work that
>> needs to be done to ensure the lookup tables are being linked to the
>> scorecards and scores are being properly tabulated. [ Resolved Already]
>>
>> 3) View recorded surveys from the web app
>>
>> This still needs to be built out. @Raunak - is this something you
>> could take up? [ @Ed We can do this now for a particular survey for a 
>> given
>> client ]
>>
>> 4) Interface to create new surveys from scratch via the UI [ Already
>> Done, Needs testing and modifications ]
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Shaik Nazeer <
>> nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ed,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is actual requirement on this score cards? After submitting the
>>> data, just return the list of score cards? Is there any view we need to
>>> implement to see this scores?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Nazeer
>>>
>>> *From:* Nazeer Shaik [mailto:nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com]
>>> *Sent:* 03 August 2017 17:25
>>> *To:* Raunak Sett; Santosh Math
>>> *Cc:* Ed Cable; Dev; Mifos software development; Adi Raju
>>> *Subject:* Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Raunak,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have analyzed this implementation found there is an issue with
>>> this. 

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

[Ippez Robert]

How I wish I was technical enough to handle some of these things. Normally
when PRs are sent they stay long enough and i wish I have all the expertise
to handle this, a sent PR will not take more than one day and will be
merged if approved.



On 14 Sep 2017 09:15, "Santosh Math" 
wrote:

> Hi Ed,
>
> Yes , There was an issue, it's fixed and Nazeer sent PR almost 21 days ago
> here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/406
>
> He had been expecting some one else should review his PR but no one did it.
>
> Nazeer would merge all the PRs by today evening and update the servers by
> tomorrow evening.
>
> Regards
> Santosh
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>
> > Nazeer,
> >
> > I'm replying on this thread here so we can give a response to Nathan
> about
> > when PPI will be available.
> >
> > Santosh - had you had a chance to make the issue per Nazeer's email on
> > August 3?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
> >
> >> Nazeer,
> >>
> >> Can you confirm with Raunak that you've resolved his blockers. On our
> >> call this morning, he was still facing some issues but I'm not sure if
> he
> >> had used the latest code with all of the fixes.
> >>
> >> Ed
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Raunak Sett 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> @Nazeer also here is some implementation details documented by Markus
> >>> https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOSX/Socia
> >>> l+Performance+Management+Framework
> >>>  Performance+Management+Framework> also
> >>> can we discuss it further, I'm still having some troubles retrieving
> the
> >>> scorecard entries for a client.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Raunak,
> 
>  Thanks for sending this along again.
> 
>  Nazeer, the results of the survey should be their score which measures
>  if they are above or below the poverty line and their movement out of
>  poverty via an improving score can be tracked over time.
> 
>  Please watch this video to learn more: http://www.progressoutof
>  poverty.org/ppi-overview-video
> 
>  Viewing the old PPI spec might be helpful too.
>  https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOS/PPI+Functional+Spec
> 
> 
> 
>  On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Raunak Sett 
>  wrote:
> 
> > @Nazeer, It was nice talking to you on call. I guess we will be able
> > to do it. I'm pasting a part of the thread with Ed and Nathan for the
> > context of what we need on the SPM framework. Check for [ ] for
> updates on
> > the points.
> >
> > 1) Build out the UI for creating survey from available PPI scorecard
> > [ Needs discussion ]
> >
> > Right now we should simply have to run the PPI-uploader tool on your
> > instance and it will upload the PPIs that have been added as XMLs.
> This
> > should work fine right now (apart from having to make some slight
> > modifications to the PPI-uploader based on the recent changes to
> resources
> > with switch to fineract from mifos x.  [ Resolved Already ]
> > 2) Capture/record surveys from a given entity in the web app
> >
> > This is currently available from the UI (you can test it out at
> > https://demo.openmf.org (mifos/password) by navigating to any
> client,
> > clicking more dropdown and then survey. You can then select the
> survey from
> > the dropdown and enter responses. We do have some work that needs to
> be
> > done to ensure the lookup tables are being linked to the scorecards
> and
> > scores are being properly tabulated. [ Resolved Already]
> >
> > 3) View recorded surveys from the web app
> >
> > This still needs to be built out. @Raunak - is this something you
> > could take up? [ @Ed We can do this now for a particular survey for
> a given
> > client ]
> >
> > 4) Interface to create new surveys from scratch via the UI [ Already
> > Done, Needs testing and modifications ]
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Shaik Nazeer <
> > nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ed,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What is actual requirement on this score cards? After submitting the
> >> data, just return the list of score cards? Is there any view we
> need to
> >> implement to see this scores?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Nazeer
> >>
> >> *From:* Nazeer Shaik [mailto:nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com]
> >> *Sent:* 03 August 2017 17:25
> >> *To:* Raunak Sett; Santosh Math
> >> *Cc:* Ed Cable; Dev; Mifos software development; Adi Raju
> >> *Subject:* Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker
> >>
> >>
> 

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

[Raunak Sett]

@Ed Yes, once the PR is merged I think that should be enough from the
platform side for nathan, and I can take up further enhancement work on the
front end.

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Ippez Robert 
wrote:

> How I wish I was technical enough to handle some of these things. Normally
> when PRs are sent they stay long enough and i wish I have all the expertise
> to handle this, a sent PR will not take more than one day and will be
> merged if approved.
>
>
>
> On 14 Sep 2017 09:15, "Santosh Math" 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> Yes , There was an issue, it's fixed and Nazeer sent PR almost 21 days ago
>> here:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/406
>>
>> He had been expecting some one else should review his PR but no one did
>> it.
>>
>> Nazeer would merge all the PRs by today evening and update the servers by
>> tomorrow evening.
>>
>> Regards
>> Santosh
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>>
>> > Nazeer,
>> >
>> > I'm replying on this thread here so we can give a response to Nathan
>> about
>> > when PPI will be available.
>> >
>> > Santosh - had you had a chance to make the issue per Nazeer's email on
>> > August 3?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>> >
>> >> Nazeer,
>> >>
>> >> Can you confirm with Raunak that you've resolved his blockers. On our
>> >> call this morning, he was still facing some issues but I'm not sure if
>> he
>> >> had used the latest code with all of the fixes.
>> >>
>> >> Ed
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Raunak Sett 
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> @Nazeer also here is some implementation details documented by Markus
>> >>> https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOSX/Socia
>> >>> l+Performance+Management+Framework
>> >>> > ormance+Management+Framework> also
>> >>> can we discuss it further, I'm still having some troubles retrieving
>> the
>> >>> scorecard entries for a client.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>> >>>
>>  Hi Raunak,
>> 
>>  Thanks for sending this along again.
>> 
>>  Nazeer, the results of the survey should be their score which
>> measures
>>  if they are above or below the poverty line and their movement out of
>>  poverty via an improving score can be tracked over time.
>> 
>>  Please watch this video to learn more: http://www.progressoutof
>>  poverty.org/ppi-overview-video
>> 
>>  Viewing the old PPI spec might be helpful too.
>>  https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOS/PPI+Functional+Spec
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Raunak Sett 
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> > @Nazeer, It was nice talking to you on call. I guess we will be able
>> > to do it. I'm pasting a part of the thread with Ed and Nathan for
>> the
>> > context of what we need on the SPM framework. Check for [ ] for
>> updates on
>> > the points.
>> >
>> > 1) Build out the UI for creating survey from available PPI scorecard
>> > [ Needs discussion ]
>> >
>> > Right now we should simply have to run the PPI-uploader tool on your
>> > instance and it will upload the PPIs that have been added as XMLs.
>> This
>> > should work fine right now (apart from having to make some slight
>> > modifications to the PPI-uploader based on the recent changes to
>> resources
>> > with switch to fineract from mifos x.  [ Resolved Already ]
>> > 2) Capture/record surveys from a given entity in the web app
>> >
>> > This is currently available from the UI (you can test it out at
>> > https://demo.openmf.org (mifos/password) by navigating to any
>> client,
>> > clicking more dropdown and then survey. You can then select the
>> survey from
>> > the dropdown and enter responses. We do have some work that needs
>> to be
>> > done to ensure the lookup tables are being linked to the scorecards
>> and
>> > scores are being properly tabulated. [ Resolved Already]
>> >
>> > 3) View recorded surveys from the web app
>> >
>> > This still needs to be built out. @Raunak - is this something you
>> > could take up? [ @Ed We can do this now for a particular survey for
>> a given
>> > client ]
>> >
>> > 4) Interface to create new surveys from scratch via the UI [ Already
>> > Done, Needs testing and modifications ]
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Shaik Nazeer <
>> > nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Ed,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> What is actual requirement on this score cards? After submitting
>> the
>> >> data, just return the list of score cards? Is there any view we
>> need to
>> >> implement to 

Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

[Sendoro Juma]

Dear Robert,

I concur and subscribe to your comments; 
We would still though suggest Mr. Nazeer to continue support us, while we 
continue building that capability to support him!!!

Regards
Sendoro

- Original Message -
From: "Ippez Robert" 
To: "dev" 
Cc: "mifos-developer" , "Shaik Nazeer" 
, "Raunak Sett" , 
"Adi Raju" , "Ed Cable" 
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 9:20:23 AM
Subject: Re: SPM Survey Storage Blocker

How I wish I was technical enough to handle some of these things. Normally
when PRs are sent they stay long enough and i wish I have all the expertise
to handle this, a sent PR will not take more than one day and will be
merged if approved.



On 14 Sep 2017 09:15, "Santosh Math" 
wrote:

> Hi Ed,
>
> Yes , There was an issue, it's fixed and Nazeer sent PR almost 21 days ago
> here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/406
>
> He had been expecting some one else should review his PR but no one did it.
>
> Nazeer would merge all the PRs by today evening and update the servers by
> tomorrow evening.
>
> Regards
> Santosh
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
>
> > Nazeer,
> >
> > I'm replying on this thread here so we can give a response to Nathan
> about
> > when PPI will be available.
> >
> > Santosh - had you had a chance to make the issue per Nazeer's email on
> > August 3?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Ed Cable  wrote:
> >
> >> Nazeer,
> >>
> >> Can you confirm with Raunak that you've resolved his blockers. On our
> >> call this morning, he was still facing some issues but I'm not sure if
> he
> >> had used the latest code with all of the fixes.
> >>
> >> Ed
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Raunak Sett 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> @Nazeer also here is some implementation details documented by Markus
> >>> https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOSX/Socia
> >>> l+Performance+Management+Framework
> >>>  Performance+Management+Framework> also
> >>> can we discuss it further, I'm still having some troubles retrieving
> the
> >>> scorecard entries for a client.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Ed Cable  wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Raunak,
> 
>  Thanks for sending this along again.
> 
>  Nazeer, the results of the survey should be their score which measures
>  if they are above or below the poverty line and their movement out of
>  poverty via an improving score can be tracked over time.
> 
>  Please watch this video to learn more: http://www.progressoutof
>  poverty.org/ppi-overview-video
> 
>  Viewing the old PPI spec might be helpful too.
>  https://mifosforge.jira.com/wiki/display/MIFOS/PPI+Functional+Spec
> 
> 
> 
>  On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Raunak Sett 
>  wrote:
> 
> > @Nazeer, It was nice talking to you on call. I guess we will be able
> > to do it. I'm pasting a part of the thread with Ed and Nathan for the
> > context of what we need on the SPM framework. Check for [ ] for
> updates on
> > the points.
> >
> > 1) Build out the UI for creating survey from available PPI scorecard
> > [ Needs discussion ]
> >
> > Right now we should simply have to run the PPI-uploader tool on your
> > instance and it will upload the PPIs that have been added as XMLs.
> This
> > should work fine right now (apart from having to make some slight
> > modifications to the PPI-uploader based on the recent changes to
> resources
> > with switch to fineract from mifos x.  [ Resolved Already ]
> > 2) Capture/record surveys from a given entity in the web app
> >
> > This is currently available from the UI (you can test it out at
> > https://demo.openmf.org (mifos/password) by navigating to any
> client,
> > clicking more dropdown and then survey. You can then select the
> survey from
> > the dropdown and enter responses. We do have some work that needs to
> be
> > done to ensure the lookup tables are being linked to the scorecards
> and
> > scores are being properly tabulated. [ Resolved Already]
> >
> > 3) View recorded surveys from the web app
> >
> > This still needs to be built out. @Raunak - is this something you
> > could take up? [ @Ed We can do this now for a particular survey for
> a given
> > client ]
> >
> > 4) Interface to create new surveys from scratch via the UI [ Already
> > Done, Needs testing and modifications ]
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Shaik Nazeer <
> > nazeer.sh...@confluxtechnologies.com> wrote:
> 

Need for help in reviewing PRs

[Ed Cable]

Hi all,

Once again not to sound like a broken record but echoing the same
sentiments in my previous email about the need for help in GSOC reviews.
The need for members of the PMC to review pull requests in general extends
beyond just these Google Summer of Code contributions. Nazeer, could use
help so there's not a backlog of pull requests to be reviewed.

Apart from just needing more hands on deck to assist, it would be ideal
that we could have a second set of eyes review pull requests that Nazeer
has himself made before they can be merged. Right now with only one
maintainer, when Nazeer is writing new features, himself, he has nobody to
do an external review.

Thanks,

Ed



-- 
*Ed Cable*
President/CEO, Mifos Initiative
edca...@mifos.org | Skype: edcable | Mobile: +1.484.477.8649

*Collectively Creating a World of 3 Billion Maries | *http://mifos.org