RE: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-02-15 Thread Markus Geiß
this helps. ; o) Cheers Markus -Original Message- From: send...@singo.co.tz [mailto:send...@singo.co.tz] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 08:56 AM To: dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org Cc: Ed Cable <edca...@mifos.org> Subject: Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for grad

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-02-14 Thread sendoro
ssage- > From: Markus Geiß [mailto:mge...@mifos.org] > Sent: 26 January 2017 01:55 > To: Ed Cable > Cc: dev (dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org) > Subject: Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation > > Hey Ed, > > the Apache Fineract website is a github re

RE: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-02-14 Thread Shaik Nazeer
@fineract.incubator.apache.org) Subject: Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation Just doing a check-in as to where we stand. Nazeer has been addressing some of the outstanding points and has recently posted some additional release management documentation which can be viewed at https

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
can be found at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Release+Folders > > Thanks, > Nazeer > -Original Message- > From: Markus Geiß [mailto:mge...@mifos.org] > Sent: 26 January 2017 01:55 > To: Ed Cable > Cc: dev (dev@fineract.incubator.apache.or

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-27 Thread Myrle Krantz
Nazeer > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Markus Geiß [mailto:mge...@mifos.org] > >> Sent: 26 January 2017 01:55 > >> To: Ed Cable > >> Cc: dev (dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org) > >> Subject: Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readin

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-26 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Ed Cable wrote: > Nazeer, > > We do need to link to the latest download which in this case is 0.6.0 from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/fineract/ > > Markus - is there a way in which to dynanmically link to the latest

RE: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-25 Thread sendoro
@mifos.org] Sent: 26 January 2017 01:55 To: Ed Cable Cc: dev (dev@fineract.incubator.apache.org) Subject: Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation Hey Ed, the Apache Fineract website is a github repo you'll find at Apache's github mirror. Simply fork it, create a new branch, d

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-25 Thread Markus Geiß
Hey Ed, the Apache Fineract website is a github repo you'll find at Apache's github mirror. Simply fork it, create a new branch, do the needed changes and send a PR. Best wishes, Markus Geiss Chief Architect RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative On Jan 24, 2017 15:58, "Ed Cable"

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-24 Thread Ed Cable
Markus, Nazeer is continuing to work on addressing the areas of concern related to QU10, QU40, and RE50. Could you provide me access to the Apache Fineract website to address CO10 and then for CS10 do we want that on the Apache Fineract website or the wiki? Thanks, Ed On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
Agreed. > On Jan 6, 2017, at 8:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Ed Cable wrote: >> Could our Apache Fineract mentors please provide some guidance on a couple >> of the areas we need to improve upon: >> >> QU10 "*The

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-06 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Ed Cable wrote: > Could our Apache Fineract mentors please provide some guidance on a couple > of the areas we need to improve upon: > > QU10 "*The project is open and honest about the quality of its code. > Various levels of quality and maturity

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-06 Thread Ed Cable
Could our Apache Fineract mentors please provide some guidance on a couple of the areas we need to improve upon: QU10 "*The project is open and honest about the quality of its code. Various levels of quality and maturity for various modules are natural and acceptable as long as they are clearly

Re: Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-04 Thread Sander van der Heyden
Hi Myrle, Thanks for doing the first round of this, I've added my name to a lot of your evaluations and extended a few as well. I've still left a few blank, as I am not 100% clear on them and would therefore prefer to wait for a few more opinions on them. Thanks, Sander Sander van der Heyden

Please help evaluation Fineract's readiness for graduation

2017-01-03 Thread Myrle Krantz
Hi all, Apache has a project maturity model which can be used to evaluate readiness for graduation. It's a guide rather then a set of requirements, but I believe we can use it. I've used it to create a page evaluating *our* readiness: