I am still willing to contribute, though most of my contributions are
more on the legacy side at this point.
Rob
On 10/21/2023 12:26 PM, jason_y54 wrote:
Hey Chris,
I’m also willing and able.
- Jason
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 10:45 AM, Evan Jones <[evan.a.jon...@gmail.com](mailto:On Sat,
I don't recall enough about our initial browser compatibility list, but,
if we haven't yet already deprecated IE support, this will do it. For
the sake of correctness, |fetch| isn't a protocol, it is just a browser
API. Both the |fetch| and |XMLHttpRequest| APIs will make essentially
the same
I don't have a strong opinion on this but, in my experience, having one
reviewer ought to be sufficient assuming they are familiar with the
code-to-be-changed. I don't believe committers should be able review
their code outside of extraordinary circumstances, such as a very high
priority
I received an automated notification on my personal email regarding this
policy change:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2021/11/03/add-on-policy-changes-2021/
I don't think Flagon would be too adversely affected, but some of the
bullets do apply. Here are the main changes:
- Collecting
Evidently I did not hit "submit review". Really killing it.
On 3/16/2021 9:05 PM, Joshua Poore wrote:
Rob—Sorry, I was just digging into it and I didn’t see your review or feedback.
is your new handle added to apache-git? PM me if you want about this.
On Mar 16, 2021, at 10:36 AM,
Added some feedback to the PR, looks good though. I think that there is
a lot of room for useful Cypress tests to automate what is likely a very
manual process at the moment. A bespoke branch is probably the right
option (imo).
Rob
On 3/15/2021 2:01 PM, Joshua Poore wrote:
Starting new
le? We can continue discussion on another thread.
Josh
On Mar 14, 2021, at 1:09 PM, Rob Foley wrote:
Hi Gedd,
Thanks for contributing. If you have any questions about Userale or any of its
design decisions, feel free to reach out. Ditto on the Zoom/etc. front.
@poorejc wrt Cypress, I've gotten a
Hi Gedd,
Thanks for contributing. If you have any questions about Userale or any
of its design decisions, feel free to reach out. Ditto on the Zoom/etc.
front.
@poorejc wrt Cypress, I've gotten a decent bit of experience writing
Cypress tests in the last year or so. I don't quite see (at
+1
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 12:38 PM Joshua Poore wrote:
> +1 (non-binding, Flagon PPMC)
>
> > On Feb 21, 2021, at 12:34 PM, Laura Mariano
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 9:06 PM Joshua Poore wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Folks,
> >>
> >> Please VOTE on the Apache Flagon UserALE.js
A bit late, but +1:
[x] Build and Unit Tests Pass
[x] DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE Files in Source and Binary Release
Packages
[x] Signatures and Hashes Match Keys
[x] CHANGELOG included with release distribution
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:14 PM Joshua Poore wrote:
> pushed updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLAGON-464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944659#comment-16944659
]
Rob Foley commented on FLAGON-464:
--
It should be a fairly straightforward integration in terms
ext of
> getInitialSettings it looks like we get an error specific to
> sessionStorage. I’ve tried pulling in some add’l npm packages meant to
> define storage elements, but haven’t had success yet. Then again, haven’t
> had bandwidth to try really hard yet.
> >
> > Thanks Rob. Mor
I looked through the branch/issue and tried playing around with the code a
bit. It seems like the userale script is not being added to the JSDom
environment. Our custom resourceLoader (found in test/testUtils.js) is
being ran, and is getting the correct content, however at some point JSDom
is not
s actively discouraging its misuse, but that would likely only
discourage those who had no ill intentions anyways.
Rob
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:47 PM Rob Foley (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLAGON-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLAGON-435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16900151#comment-16900151
]
Rob Foley commented on FLAGON-435:
--
If the idea is "attach script tag to the tab with this id"
+1
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019, 4:40 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 from me.
>
> I checked:
> - Incubating in name
> - Disclaimer exists
> - LICENSE is fine
> - NOTICE is fine
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Code compiles and tests successfully run
>
> On the other hand, I've tried to run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLAGON-395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16863082#comment-16863082
]
Rob Foley commented on FLAGON-395:
--
Why not just use vanilla WebSockets? There shouldn't be too great
+1
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:36 PM Joshua Poore wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Mentors say safe bet is to do re-release of UserALE.js 1.0.0 under strict
> release process. As such I am calling a VOTE:
>
> Please VOTE on the Apache FLAGON UserALE.js 1.0.0 Release Candidate #3.
>
> We solved 50 issues:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLAGON-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861648#comment-16861648
]
Rob Foley edited comment on FLAGON-394 at 6/12/19 1:05 AM:
---
Ahh, so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLAGON-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16861648#comment-16861648
]
Rob Foley commented on FLAGON-394:
--
Ahh, so is this intended as a potential alternative to the bowie viz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLAGON-296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860153#comment-16860153
]
Rob Foley commented on FLAGON-296:
--
This may be difficult/not plausible. A server might just return
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLAGON-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16860148#comment-16860148
]
Rob Foley commented on FLAGON-394:
--
What's a funnel element? Is this NiFi slang?
> Late
22 matches
Mail list logo
