Erik,
This sounds very exciting. I cant wait to play around with your
prototype! I am looking at the README files and I dont seem to be able to
locate anything regarding how to build and use your prototype.
The falcon\trunk\compiler.jx\README does not seem to have anything
significant.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@gmail.comwrote:
@Roland
For the SDK it s surely not a problem since it s all Apache.
But anyone using the Apache Flex SDK to write an ExtJS application will
need a commercial license from Sencha or will have to open source the code.
Please take a look at the proof of concept (both the intermediate and
release code) before making these kinds of statements.
I'd like to, but you admitted yourself that it has quite an initial
overhead to set up. Could you perhaps set up an online demo where one can
observe a running system?
Is Example.js a generated cross compile?
Mike
Quoting Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl:
Please take a look at the proof of concept (both the intermediate and
release code) before making these kinds of statements.
I'd like to, but you admitted yourself that it has quite an initial
overhead
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Please take a look at the proof of concept (both the intermediate and
release code) before making these kinds of statements.
I'd like to, but you admitted yourself that it has quite an initial
overhead to set up.
Good day to all of you :)
Hold on, I think this is going to be a long message...
Moving on from the latest discussion between Erik and Frank about the ideal
implementation of AS-JS cross-compilation,
I think its perhaps an interesting venture to talk a little bit about some
possible changes we
Quoting Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net:
I'm looking forward to seeing the Falcon implementation of your
AMD/RequireJS ideas and it's output, so we can compare the various
suggested approaches on their technical merits as well as their
theoretical underpinnings.
Okay, we can wait for
+1 on this.
FYI, As the Apache way suggests, itch your scratch... This one is
going to happen and I will be working on it with Roland. We are
looking for constructive criticism, not a blessing. :)
I already have 2 compilers to work with and it's ridiculous one parse
session can't be used
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Michael Schmalle
apa...@teotigraphix.comwrote:
Quoting Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net:
I'm looking forward to seeing the Falcon implementation of your
AMD/RequireJS ideas and it's output, so we can compare the various
suggested approaches on their
Frank,
Definitely a cultural difference here with my writing below.
Basically, the point was, you CAN compare right now but, I think Erik
was or just missed that fact you CAN compare right now.
As far as your comments about how things should be compared, my point
was, start comparing! :)
That being said, I think both Erik and I got the ball rolling. It is not
as if we are just talking theory here. We both have a working demo
everybody can look at, and have both posted our arguments. Maybe we should
just start a new thread to get this to a decision.
But I don't want to force a
Did you end up with a set of scripts as described in [1]?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/FlexJS+Status
You will need to have the frameworks/js folder available to the html file,
as well as the goog and third_party folders from the google libraries. The
compiler does not
Yes, the one in 'intermediate' is. The one in 'release' is the
'intermediate' version, but run through the Closure Compiler.
EdB
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Michael Schmalle
apa...@teotigraphix.com wrote:
Is Example.js a generated cross compile?
Mike
Quoting Erik de Bruin
I think I can now pinpoint the difference to RequireJS: It is in the
existence of deps.js.
deps.js says it's generated, and seems to be the extracted dependencies of
all the other JS files, right? Aha, so this is how the necessary scripts
get loaded in advance. And this is where you need the
Well the PMC would not veto commits.
It would veto the notion o including something in the SDK that wasn't
agreed upon via consensus.
Just to be clear. :)
-omar
On Sunday, January 27, 2013, Erik de Bruin wrote:
But I don't want to force a decision right now;
The beauty of the Apache Way
Roland,
Me likey.
Some comments and suggestions inline:
I think it might make more sense to create a single point of entry for all
types of compilation. Let's call this point of entry FLEXC (credit:
Michael Schmalle). Wouldn't it be cleaner to use this FLEXC compiler as a
sort of factory
Take a chill pill. ;)
Really? Nice!
I prefer contributing over chillin, thank you.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13563863#comment-13563863
]
zy commented on FLEX-33366:
---
Thank you for your help.I do a test on another win7 use IE9。It is
Really.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Take a chill pill. ;)
Really? Nice!
I prefer contributing over chillin, thank you.
EdB
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
I think I can now pinpoint the difference to RequireJS: It is in the
existence of deps.js.
deps.js says it's generated, and seems to be the extracted dependencies
of
all the other JS files, right? Aha, so this is
You guys might enjoy my blog post:
http://printui.com/blog/2013/01/flex-flash/
If you do, feel free to pass it on… ;-)
Harbs
Where did you get 1992?
I think Gordon meant 2002 on his bio, someone correct me if I am wrong.
Mike
Quoting Harbs harbs.li...@gmail.com:
You guys might enjoy my blog post:
http://printui.com/blog/2013/01/flex-flash/
If you do, feel free to pass it on? ;-)
Harbs
--
Michael Schmalle -
I copied it from his bio. If it was a typo, I'll correct it.
Yeah. 1992 sounds like a very long time ago…
On Jan 28, 2013, at 1:06 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
Where did you get 1992?
I think Gordon meant 2002 on his bio, someone correct me if I am wrong.
Mike
Quoting Harbs
I would change it now just to be safe so you don't flamed.
Very nice article Harbs, I think you caught exactly what I have been
saying about what I envision the compiler turning into. My work on the
compilers etc aims at taking the power of a language and pointing it
in the direction we
Yeah. Changed already… ;-)
Thanks. I hope the article helps some more people get it. You guys have been
doing awesome work!
On Jan 28, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
I would change it now just to be safe so you don't flamed.
Very nice article Harbs, I think you caught exactly
Nice Article!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: zondag 27 januari 2013 23:16
Aan: dev@flex.apache.org
Onderwerp: Re: [PR] Flex != Flash
Yeah. Changed already. ;-)
Thanks. I hope the article helps some more people get it. You guys have
been
On 1/27/13 7:18 PM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Alex, I think you would be the best person to answer this.
What would be the Actionscript equivalent of this mxml file:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/flex/asjs/branches/develop/examples/FlexJSTest_ag
ain/FlexJSTest.mxml?view=markup
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564058#comment-13564058
]
Alex Harui commented on FLEX-33366:
---
I still cannot reproduce this problem. Please go
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 1/27/13 7:18 PM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
Alex, I think you would be the best person to answer this.
What would be the Actionscript equivalent of this mxml file:
Hi,
Excellent article! Thanks to the team for keeping the Flex flame burning.
Rgs,
Sugan Naicker
South Africa
-Original Message-
From: Harbs [mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 January 2013 12:59 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [PR] Flex != Flash
You guys might enjoy my blog
On 1/27/13 10:50 PM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
But they dont seem to match up. Can you please respond with how the mxml
would look when redone as a pure actionscript file?
There are two possible answers to this question. One is for the question:
what would the generated AS for the
Hi,
entire library + application. My example was that you change a single
file, but change it in a way that you add a dependency. Without
re-generating deps.js, base.js could not know in advance that the newly
We're talking AS - JS cross compilation. So changing one file would
be changing one
32 matches
Mail list logo
