Hi,
We would have to bundle the source with the SDK and vote on a new SDK release.
Wouldn't that also be in violation? And actually force the component to be non
optional, unless you count having it installed but not using it as non optional?
Justin
What is preventing us from doing what Apache Open Office is doing here?
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice
Thanks,
Om
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi,
We would have to bundle the source with
Hi,
What is preventing us from doing what Apache Open Office is doing here?
Basically they got special permission to bundle (L)GPL dictionaries, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-117, but yes you right they also
link to them.
Lucerne does exactly what we are doing (as far as I
Hi,
Lucerne does exactly what we are doing (as far as I can see).
Sorry wrong link - try this link instead:
https://code.google.com/p/lucene-hunspell/
Justin
Hi,
Or even better this link:
https://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0/analyzers-common/org/apache/lucene/analysis/hunspell/package-summary.html
Justin
I’m working on selection issues (related to the table work I’ve done), and I
need to fix some things related to bidi selections.
Is there anyone here who’s familiar with how the code works? Specifically, I
need to understand TextFlowLine.makeSelectionBlocks and
Ignore that. I figured out the problem.
On Aug 31, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Harbs harbs.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m working on selection issues (related to the table work I’ve done), and I
need to fix some things related to bidi selections.
Is there anyone here who’s familiar with how the code
If we decide to go down this path, we should sort of have a standard fort he
main subproject branch.
I would suggest develop-{subproject-name}.
This way all develop branches should be sorted and visible together and you
don't have to check if it's just a feature branch of something else.
Is
You can automate the deployment of SNAPSHOT versions using Apache Jenkins
Credentials. It's simply that they have vonfigured Jenkins to use a
settings.xml in which the server tags are filled with the credentials of a
technical user we can use to deploy stuff.
Releases can never be automatic as
I’ve never used Squiggly, but I would like to — with one caveat.
I’m not sure if there’s any way to include languages that optionally download
at runtime. Having to include every possible language at compile time is a
deal-breaker for me. That’s a few hundred KB per language that I cannot
Hi,
I’m not sure if there’s any way to include languages that optionally download
at runtime.
You specify the language via the SpellingConfig.xml files, that's loaded at
runtime then dictionaries specified in that file are loaded at runtime. So you
can have no dictionaries, user defined
Hi,
Eventually it could utilize Flex' runtime loaded resource-bundles?
Not that I can see, the format, while text based, is very different.
Justin
The lucene link looks like it is doc for a java package of classes, not a
separate file in the release artifact.
IMO, we can link to link AOO or offer downloads in the ant
scripts/installer. I think the second key question is, does the code that
calls/uses the category X code/data need to be in
Hi,
The lucene link looks like it is doc for a java package of classes, not a
separate file in the release artifact.
It generated from the source and is in the release.
IMO, we can link to link AOO
Which is exactly what we are doing in the RC.
Remember that the Flex SDK already has a
Some more work in progress, still early, but even so I bet some people would
have liked this time ago:
http://www.flashdevelop.org/community/viewtopic.php?p=52180#p52180
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
Some time ago we had a donation of a Tour De Flex style mobile app.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33839
Amy objection if I move it from examples and place with the other Tour De Flex
applications [1] and start adding some of Adobe's donated examples to it.
Thanks,
Justin
1
+1 I think it will generate a lot of interest
On 31 August 2014 23:48, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Some time ago we had a donation of a Tour De Flex style mobile app.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33839
Amy objection if I move it from examples and place
Hi,
-1. I was thinking of proposing to move TDF to the flex-examples repo.
That would be the appropriate place for this.
That would also work - as long as both are in the same place.
Are we going to loose any history in moving it? If so it maybe better to move
the other way.
Justin
Hi,
By the end of the day we'll should have 4,000 successful installs for 4.13.0
via the installer, there are course more installs via the mirrors and other
places, also we're just short of 60,000 installs via the installer.
The numbers if you're curious:
4.13.0 2847 windows 1097 mac
4.12.1
Hi,
While the error install rate is high for the Apache Flex SDK it's a lot higher
for Flex JS. For 0.02 there's been 97 installs on windows, 27 on mac and 250+
errors installing.
Perhaps someone should take a look at this? Errors don't seem to be related to
one particular cause.
Thanks,
In order to support unloading embedded font modules, the Flex SDK does not
automatically call registerFont for embedded fonts. Instead, certain API
calls have to executed in the module's context (the ABC instructions are
in a particular SWF).
-Alex
On 8/31/14 2:53 AM, Harbs
I guess I don't understand. You think the PMC should vote to approve a
release that only contains Squiggly?
My understanding of the legal-discuss thread is that we cannot. We have
to bundle the code in some other release like the Flex SDK where it
Squiggly's capabilities can be seen as an
Is there a top 5 or 10 errors for FlexJS?
On 8/31/14 7:07 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
While the error install rate is high for the Apache Flex SDK it's a lot
higher for Flex JS. For 0.02 there's been 97 installs on windows, 27 on
mac and 250+ errors installing.
Hi,
My understanding of the legal-discuss thread is that we cannot.
My understanding is that we can.
Given other projects have done similar things with Hunspell lets move forward
with the release and if and when Legal come back with a clear decision we can
(if required) fix any issues they
Hi,
Is there a top 5 or 10 errors for FlexJS?
You'll need to look in google analytics, I didn't record them, but most seem to
relate to download errors.
Given it's much higher error rate points to an issue with something FlexJS
depends on that the SDK doesn't or perhaps a general issue with
I guess we see it differently. The two answers we got seemed to conflict.
I've asked for clarification on legal-discuss.
On 8/31/14 9:35 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
My understanding of the legal-discuss thread is that we cannot.
My understanding is that we can.
Probably the latter. FlexJS does more downloading than the Flex SDK.
On 8/31/14 9:39 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a top 5 or 10 errors for FlexJS?
You'll need to look in google analytics, I didn't record them, but most
seem to relate to download errors.
Hi,
I've fixed the few remaining issues with Tour De Flex.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34497
The changes from the previous version can be found in the release notes:
https://github.com/apache/flex-utilities/blob/develop/TourDeFlex/TourDeFlex3/RELEASE_NOTES
Are there any other
Hi,
So given the reply on legal would now agree we can release as a separate
package and we can move forward with the vote on the RC?
Thanks,
Justin
It still isn't clear to me. I asked for more clarification. Here are two
parts of the last reply on legal-discuss:
If you want just a spell-checker package, then that is fine. You just
can't produce something that requires Category X (whether build or run
time).
First he says we can have a
Hi,
If you want just a spell-checker package, then that is fine. You just
can't produce something that requires Category X (whether build or run
time).
And Squiggly doesn't require anything that is Category X. The dictionaries come
in many licences, it just seems most are LGPL.
This is no
Wow~ The tide is getting higher!
At 2014-09-01 09:47:50, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
By the end of the day we'll should have 4,000 successful installs for 4.13.0
via the installer, there are course more installs via the mirrors and other
places, also we're just short of
Hi,
Wow~ The tide is getting higher!
4.13.0 is seeing slightly slower adoption than previous few versions but it had
a bit of a bumpy start with some MD5 issues and Adobe disabling access to their
open source repository.
Thanks,
Justin
33 matches
Mail list logo
