Hi,
> Possibly. Which part adds overhead in your opinion?
In that it a feature that not all users may use that's being implemented by
conditional logic so it adds to both run time and possibly size cost. While
that cost would be small in the past on the Flex list code similar to this has
been
Hi,
That is a problem, but for Royale, we should stop requiring the flex-sdk
> repo and just use Apache Flex release bits.
>
For now, it's way easier to simply make the code run and let devs get set
up with a workable Royale SDK by following the steps in the READme.
And since this is a Flex issu
That is a problem, but for Royale, we should stop requiring the flex-sdk
repo and just use Apache Flex release bits.
My 2 cents,
-Alex
On 9/28/17, 5:53 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>When I got to sourceforge directly, I see the download link as:
>
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?u
When I got to sourceforge directly, I see the download link as:
https://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/4/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/OSMF2_0.swc?format=raw
Which is different from the one in the build script:
https://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/OSMF2_0.s
Hi,
When I run 'ant' on a fresh copy of the Flex SDK repo, I get the following
error:
[error]
download-osmf-swc:
[get] Getting:
https://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexsdk/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/frameworks/libs/OSMF2_0.swc?format=raw
[get] To: /Users/erik/Desktop/royale/flex-sdk/in/osmf.swc
Now I can open that link,
Thanks very much for your help!
--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/
