Board report for October 2022 has been submitted

2022-10-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
## Description: The mission of the Apache Flex project is to create and maintain software related to the development of expressive web applications that deploy to all major browsers, desktops and devices (including smartphones, tablets and tv) ## Issues: ## Membership Data: Apache Flex was

Board report for September 2021 has been submitted

2021-09-10 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, since there's nothing new to report and in order to ease things I directly submitted the due September board report without letting you proofread it... hope that's ok for you! The report is available at our wiki [1] Thanks, Olaf [1]

Re: Board report time (June 2021)

2021-06-07 Thread Olaf Krueger
...it's submitted now. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Board report time (June 2021)

2021-06-01 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, it's board report time, this is the draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/June++2021 It's nearly a copy of the previous one. Please review it and feel free to add or remove whatever makes sense! The report has to be sent at the very latest until Wed Jun 9th. Thanks!

Re: Board report time March 2021

2021-03-10 Thread Olaf Krueger
The report has been submitted. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time March 2021

2021-03-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Andrew, > No changes have been made Done, thanks!! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Board report time March 2021

2021-03-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, it's board report time, this is the draft: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/March++2021 Please review it and feel free to add or remove whatever makes sense! The report has to be sent at the very latest until Wed Mar 10th. Thanks! Olaf -- Sent from:

Re: AIR app (Captive runtime) is blocked by anti-virus scanner

2021-01-22 Thread Olaf Krueger
I accidently posted it on dev, moved to users: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/AIR-app-Captive-runtime-is-blocked-by-anti-virus-scanner-td18485.html -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

AIR app (Captive runtime) is blocked by anti-virus scanner

2021-01-22 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, since we moved some remaining Flex apps to AIR (Using captive runtime), some of users reports that the app is being blocked by their anti-virus-scanner. Because in some cases, the responsable IT-departments don't like to whitelist additional apps, we run into trouble. We are not yet using a

Re: Board report time (December 2020)

2020-12-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
I just submitted the report, thanks! -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (December 2020)

2020-12-02 Thread Olaf Krueger
It's fixed, thank you Andrew! -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Board report time (December 2020)

2020-12-01 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, it's board report time! The report has to be sent at the very latest until Wed Dec 9th. This is the draft [1]. It would be great if somebody could review it. Feel free to add or remove whatever makes sense! Thanks! Olaf [1]

Re: Flex Website -- next steps

2020-09-14 Thread Olaf Krueger
+1 Thank you for working on this!! -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Board report submitted (September 2020)

2020-09-14 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, I am sorry, but I had some trouble with my incoming emails and totally overlooked the due board report reminder for September. So, I just prepared it quickly and pushed it without asking you guys to review it. You can find the submitted report here [1]. Hope that's ok for anybody, sorry

Re: the Flex website

2020-09-04 Thread Olaf Krueger
This is, what Apache says: "When should a project move to the Attic? Projects whose PMC are unable to muster 3 votes for a release, who have no active committers or are unable to fulfill their reporting duties to the board are all good candidates for the Attic." [1] Olaf

Re: the Flex website

2020-08-18 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Andrew, not sure, but it looks like we're currently using the Apache CMS. This is from the Flex Wiki [1]: "It is currently running on the Apache CMS, which is loosely built on a combination of an mdtext compiler and Svnpubsub." IIRIC, Nicholas Kwiatkowski built the page originally. I took a

Re: Board report time (June 2020)

2020-06-09 Thread Olaf Krueger
The report has been sent, thanks to all for your help! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (June 2020)

2020-06-09 Thread Olaf Krueger
Thanks Leo! I just updated the report and will send it now! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (June 2020)

2020-06-04 Thread Olaf Krueger
Sounds good, thanks Leo! I'll mention this within the report. Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (June 2020)

2020-06-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Thanks! >with the exception of the unanswered question about Harman. I thought you could say something about Harman ;-) However, if nobody has any news about it I'll just remove this section ;-) Thanks again, Andrew! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (June 2020)

2020-06-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Andrew, thanks for taking a look! I tried to share this document with you, not sure if that has any impact on the permissions. Are you basically able to login to the Confluence wiki? Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Board report time (June 2020)

2020-06-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, it's board report time! The report has to be sent at the very latest until Wed June 10th. This is the draft [1]. It would be great if somebody could review it. Feel free to add or remove whatever makes sense! Thanks! Olaf [1]

Board report time (March 2020)

2020-03-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, it's board report time! [1] The report has to be sent at the very latest until Wed Mar 11th. I'll create a draft ASAP. Until then, if someone has something that needs to be mentioned, please leave a comment here! Thanks! Olaf [1] This email was sent on behalf of the ASF Board. It

Re: Board report time (December 2019)

2019-12-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
I've just posted the report. Thanks for the help! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (December 2019)

2019-12-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
>https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Board-Report-2019-12 This is the Royale report ;-) However, I'll push the Flex version as it is now! Thanks! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (December 2019)

2019-12-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
> I edited the board report that I saw in GitHub Not sure which board you mean. Could it be that you refer to the Royale report? If not so, please provide me a link ;-) Thanks for the help! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (December 2019)

2019-12-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
> So...the simpler fix would be for every Royale committer to also be a Flex committer. I guess there's no way doing so since we have separated projects. Are you still plan to make some changes? You could post it here as Piotr mentioned. Otherwise, I would push it as it is. (I am travelling and

Re: Board report time (December 2019)

2019-12-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
>I could log in, but do not have sufficient permissions I just took a look at the document permissions. For me it looks like there're are no special restrictions defined, any logged-in user should be able to edit it. However, whatever way you find to edit it, thanks for the help!! Olaf --

Re: Board report time (December 2019)

2019-12-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
> Oops. Confluence says I am not permitted to access the document. Just the document or are you not able to login to the Confluence Wiki at all? Not sure if we I have to set special permissions to the particular document... -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (December 2019)

2019-12-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
> I added a bit more info. Cool, thanks Carlos! -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Board report time (December 2019)

2019-12-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, it's board report time! I've created the December 2019 report here [1]. Please take a look at it and add or change things if needed! The report has to be sent until Wed Dec 11th. @Carlos Would be great if you could review/change the "#Project Activity" section in relation to the latest

Launch of the 2020 ASF Community Survey

2019-12-05 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hello everyone, If you have an apache.org email, you should have received an email with an invitation to take the 2020 ASF Community Survey. Please take 15 minutes to complete it. If you do not have an apache.org email address or you didn’t receive a link, please follow this link to the

Re: [Discussion] About release flex-dk-converter-maven-extension

2019-11-13 Thread Olaf Krueger
Seems that Piotr was faster and I overlooked his post ;-) -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discussion] About release flex-dk-converter-maven-extension

2019-11-13 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, >I am registered in Apache Royale Users but i cant reply or create any new post Just to register is probably not enough, you have to subscribe to the list. See [1][2] or [3]. Hope this helps, Olaf [1]

Re: Board report time (September 2019)

2019-09-12 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, because we're in a hurry, I just submitted the report. Thanks, Carlos (at users) and Piotr for reviewing! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (June 2019)

2019-06-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
The June report is submitted! Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (June 2019)

2019-06-06 Thread Olaf Krueger
I've just applied your changes. Thanks, Andrew! -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Board report time (June 2019)

2019-06-06 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, it's board report time! I've created the June 2019 report here [1]. Please take a look at it and add or change things if needed! The report has to be sent until Mon June 10th. Thanks, Olaf [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/June+2019 -- Sent from:

Re: Board report time (March 2019)

2019-03-12 Thread Olaf Krueger
I've just submitted the report, thanks for the help!! -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Board report time (March 2019)

2019-03-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
>I'm thinking whether it's important to mention that some PMC resigned in last three months. Thank you for this hint Piotr! AFAIK Dave and Carol resigned during this period (January to March 2019)? Carol still needs to be removed. Is that right? Scott resigned in the previous board report

Re: Board report time (March 2019)

2019-03-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
>I made some edits to the text for grammar and word use, not to the substance. Great, many thanks for your help, Andrew!! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Board report time (March 2019)

2019-03-10 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, it's board report time! I've created the March 2019 report here [1]. Please take a look at it and add or change things when needed! The report has to be sent until Wed Mar 13th. Thanks, Olaf [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/March++2019 -- Sent from:

[RESULT][VOTE] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-22 Thread Olaf Krueger
Failed. Result: [0]: 4 votes [+1]: 2 votes So we leave anything as it is. Thanks for voting! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-19 Thread Olaf Krueger
+1 In 2018, 15 issues were created by using JIRA. So I don't expect too many duplicates for the future. If it is possible, we would set JIRA and the Conflucence Wiki read-only. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

[Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-17 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, this is the official vote thread to approve the move from JIRA issues to GitHub issues and to move the Confluence Wiki to the Github Wiki. As discussed here [1], the idea is to don't migrate the JIRA issues to GitHub. Instead, we want a clean restart at GitHub issues. The JIRA issues will be

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-10 Thread Olaf Krueger
@Justin > i’m that sure that it is. JIRA has a number of significant benefits over > GitHub issues including better searching and querying. (Yes I use both). Just to make sure that I got it right: Does that mean that you basically support the idea of moving from JIRA to GitHub issues or do you

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
> Are we going to say that we won't fix any of the bugs currently open in JIRA?... > My concern is having two active bug bases... We maybe could set or treat or freeze JIRA as read-only and could link to the entire Flex-JIRA from GitHub in order to not losing the history. If somebody is going to

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
> Do we know if it possible it import all historical JIRA issues ... I don't know it this is possible. > JIRA has a number of significant benefits over GitHub issues including > better searching and querying JIRA is probably more powerful but I guess the simplicity of GitHub is the greater

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
I was thinking more like a cut of the old Wiki and JIRA than a migration of the existing stuff. I think it would be easier and more transparent for folks to handle future development (if it will happen) by using GitHub. We may migrate some wiki stuff someday, don't know. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
> It looks like they have started doing something Yes, seems to be done ;-) -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, I would like to create an INFRA Jira in order to ask them to enable GitHub "Issues" and the "Wiki" for following repositories: - flex-tlf.git - flex-utilities.git - flex-flexunit.git - flex-site.git - flex-external.git - flex-sdk.git - flex-blazeds.git - flex-radii8.git We

Clean-Up after migration to GitBox

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, the repositories are moved to GitBox [1]. Daniel from INFRA commented this: "Repositories have been moved. You'll have to sort out the mess with your two web site repos yourself, one is an svn clone, one is, I presume, a repo for a next gen site? Both were called the same thing, which caused

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-07 Thread Olaf Krueger
Since nobody has objections I've created the Jira for INFRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17574 Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-04 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Carlos, yes, the migration is mandatory. They will do the migration after February 7th without any warnings. But my understanding is, that they asked the communities to do it before this deadline orderly in order to avoid as much trouble as possible. Without any feedback from the communities,

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Thanks for the explanation, Alex! > We should oblige and agree that they can move early... Just to make sure that we all are on the same path: Even if we expect some minor issues we want to let them do the migration ASAP. Each upcoming issue will be fixed after the migration is done. If that's

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, > -update any Flex jobs on builds.a.o. What is builds.a.o? > FWIW, I turned off my CI server for Flex several weeks ago Ok, for what was it used for? Do we need it for making a release? Is the installer affected by the migration? Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from:

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Just an example of how the Hadoop community has handled the migration: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17448 -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [NOTICE] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

2019-01-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi guys, if I understand it correctly we have to vote for the migration and we optionally can specify a date for it. However, - Does anybody know if this migration will break anything? - Do we need to keep the FlexJS repositories (Maybe they can be deleted because they moved to Royale)? Thanks,

Re: Flex Roadmap 2019

2018-12-18 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Leo, >I was wondering if there is anyone interested on updating / extending / >improving Flex SDK. Even if we're started using Royale we still heavily rely on Flex/AIR here and I guess we're not alone. > If so, we could discuss what might be good additions for > 2019 and make a roadmap.

Re: Help required - Board report time

2018-12-12 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Tom, I just copied the September report and added Piotr's text [1]. Maybe that helps? @Piotr Just a shoot in the dark: I always need some attempts to log in because I always forget that just the Apache ID is expected, not the email. Thanks, Olaf [1]

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

2018-11-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hmm... just a test, I just replied and it seems my post didn't make it to the list. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

2018-11-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
I noticed that rarely/sporadically some posts don't make it to the list for whatever reason. Maybe you just should give it another try...? Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: AMF for .NET Standard now available (.NET Core + olders runtimes)

2018-09-17 Thread Olaf Krueger
Maybe this helps [1]. Regardless of the GPL, I understand it this way: If no license is used within a project, in theory, the project must not be used by anyone. So it's probably always a good idea to add a license which fits your needs. It also makes it easier for others to use your project.

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 Released!

2018-07-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Piotr, thanks again for preparing the release! I just wonder if we should inform the users a bit more about what happens by using the current release. So, just a suggestion: Instead of this [1] maybe something like this?: The Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 is an update to the Apache Flex SDK

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC2

2018-07-05 Thread Olaf Krueger
+1 Windows7/64bit -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC2*

2018-07-05 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, just a shoot in the dark: Did you make sure that the selected directory is empty? Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

2018-07-04 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Alex, thanks for the good explanation, got it now! Even if the NativeInstaller is more comfortable, maybe a CaptiveRuntime version which has to be downloaded is enough someday. However, thank you for making the installer work again!! Olaf -- Sent from:

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

2018-07-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, it works for me on Windows7/64bit. Just my observations: - The first warning came up after starting the installer - After the SDK download has started the second warning came up and after confirming it the installer closed itself - After I manually restarted the installer I had to go through

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

2018-07-03 Thread Olaf Krueger
Just to give some more feedback for now: I've just downloaded and installed the installer on Windows7/64bit. After starting it I've got the first warning as mentioned. All works fine until this point. Because I am behind a proxy here I cannot continue testing, I'll try to continue with it

Life after FlashPlayer, are you prepared?

2018-04-30 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hello from the Apache Royale (FlexJS) team, even if Flex with AIR is still an awesome and outstanding technology, Flex in the browser ends with the end of FlashPlayer in 2020. To be clear: There will be no way to run your Flex apps in current browser versions around 2020! The Flex mailing

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3

2018-04-20 Thread Olaf Krueger
+1 Tested on Windows 7 and Windows 10. I had some issues with the virus scanner on my Windows 7 business machine which exiles the *installer*.exe. Maybe others run into similar issues. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

2018-04-20 Thread Olaf Krueger
Just for the sake of completeness: Today, the installation was carried out to the end under Windows7, even if it still hangs a while while "Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature". But after the installation was finished, our company virus scanner exiles the entire installer.exe for whatever

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

2018-04-19 Thread Olaf Krueger
I'll give it another try tomorrow evening, also on Windows10. Thanks for working on this Piotr!!! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

2018-04-19 Thread Olaf Krueger
>How long did you wait ? Is this your first attempt ? About 20minutes, third attend... Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

2018-04-19 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, the installer hangs here on my Windows7 machine while "Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature". Is something broken or do I miss something? Thanks, Olaf [1] Installer version 3.3.1 (windows) Using Locale: en_GB Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. SDK version Apache Flex SDK

Re: Fontawesome 5

2018-02-16 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, as soon I have time I'll try to make FontAwesome5 part of the SDK as its own project. For those who don't know how to use Font Awesome 5 with Flex: I've just created a little demo project and some explanation [1]. Hope this helps, Olaf [1]

Re: Fontawesome 5

2018-02-15 Thread Olaf Krueger
FontAwesome4 is part of the flatspark project. I would like to propose to outsource FontAwesome5 into its own project. If I remember it correctly, such a project just needs the FontAwesome otf font files, a license file and an AS3 class that holds constants for each particular icon name.

Re: Fontawesome 5

2018-02-14 Thread Olaf Krueger
Ahhh... I've just seen that you've already created the JIRA [1] Thanks, Olaf [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35380 -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Fontawesome 5

2018-02-14 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, if I understand it correctly, FontAwesome5 was rewritten from scratch and existing FontAwesome4 icons were replaced by new ones. So it seems to me that this update is not the same easy task which it was in the past. However, could you file a JIRA for this task? Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from:

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

2017-09-18 Thread Olaf Krueger
1. Boja 2. Limber (Limbr) 3. Beads Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

[OT] Unsubscribed and offline for a few weeks

2017-09-15 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, I'd just like to let you know that this my last day at work before I'll start a holiday trip over a few weeks. Hence I've been unsubscribed from the list. Probably I will be sporadically online. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-15 Thread Olaf Krueger
Could we try to summarize all name proposals in order to build a single post that contains all candidates (project names) before voting? I think it's not so easy to extract all naming ideas from the different threads/posts, I just remember a few. What do you think of just creating a list of

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-15 Thread Olaf Krueger
Another idea to get out the naming dilemma could be to find a name for the new project that still contains 'flex' but don't let you think of flex when you read it the first time, e.g.: ... Inflexion Flexor Flexure ... Just a Scrabble exercise... ;-) So people might be less confused if they find

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-15 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, This was posted by Chris at the [VOTE] thread >and I know what getting rid of "flex" everywhere inside the project would mean regarding refactoring and >tool support. I thought that for now we just vote for a new project name in order to get rid of the word 'Flex' within the Apache project

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

2017-09-14 Thread Olaf Krueger
No (Binding) On 2017-09-14 08:37, Dave Fisher <[hidden email]> wrote: > VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? > > [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. > [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be > discussed. > [ ] Abstain -

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-14 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, I just would like to mention that it seems to me that there's an inner urge inside most of us to leave the beaten paths and to build a new identity for FlexJS which is more appropriate to this awesome technology in any respects. Moreover, it seems to me more and more that such a new shiny

Re: [FLEX JS] How to import mx.managers.PopUpManager?

2017-09-12 Thread Olaf Krueger
m_awais wrote > I am trying to import mx.managers.PopUpManager in my flex JS project mxml > file. There's no way to use "s:" or "mx:" components with FlexJS! In general, you can't reuse anything that has a dependency to Flash or classic Flex! This is also true for e.g. the

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

2017-09-12 Thread Olaf Krueger
I would stick with the name "FlexJS" for now. I do not think that people associate negative vibes with it. So many other JS frameworks are born every day, I think a new name may confuse people. But I agree that in future it could make sense to rename it, especially if there will be other targets

Re: [Flex JS] Adobe substitute

2017-09-11 Thread Olaf Krueger
There's also a js:Panel [1]. And this is a working snippet [2] HTH, Olaf [1] https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/flex/org/apache/flex/html/Panel.as [2]

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

2017-09-07 Thread Olaf Krueger
>If this sound good to folks.. This sounds really good, Alex!! I think it's an important thing to get rid of some dependencies and to ease the FlexJS setup. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-09-01 Thread Olaf Krueger
+1 Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Alex, thanks for this summary, I think this is the right way to go! +1 But for me, it sounds a little bit, that Apache Flex is labeled as discontinued. We should take care to not scare off or unsettle Apache Flex users. Even if FlashPlayer is dead, Flex with AIR is still an awesome platform!

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Olaf Krueger
I've already replied via nabble a few hours ago but it seems that it is not synced with the list for whatever reason... so sorry for annoying you: Hi Alex, thanks for this summary, I think this is the right way to go! +1 But for me, it sounds a little bit, that Apache Flex is labeled as

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

2017-08-28 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hmm... if we just would like to target JS, do we still need AIR and playerglobal.swc? If not, maybe we could provide a FlexJS "JS only" version? Maybe another approach could be to declare AIR as a prerequisite? Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

2017-08-28 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, is there any chance to pre-build the various FlexJS releases including the nightly (maybe also for different platforms) at server side in order to just provide an URL to make it downloadable? So the question is, could we replace the installer by manual SDK downloads for FlexJS? And if not, is

Re: Javascript functions

2017-08-23 Thread Olaf Krueger
Piotr, whats about just creating some TypeDefs? Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Javascript-functions-tp63954p63956.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Flex/FlexJS] External dependencies (Adobe, Google, ...)

2017-08-22 Thread Olaf Krueger
Thanks Alex, that helps! -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex-FlexJS-External-dependencies-Adobe-Google-tp63945p63950.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Flex/FlexJS] External dependencies (Adobe, Google, ...)

2017-08-22 Thread Olaf Krueger
>What sort of commitment are you looking for? I was not sure about if there something is needed in the AIR source code to support Flex. But of course as you said it's all about AS3 and that should work... Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

[Flex/FlexJS] External dependencies (Adobe, Google, ...)

2017-08-22 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, we have to do a decision in near future what we will do with our Flex apps. So I'd like to know if there are any external dependencies that could stop our Flex or FlexJS apps from working. Flex: Is there something needed to do at Adobes side to ensure that Flex apps will work with future AIR

Re: [FLEXJS] Modules

2017-08-18 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Alex, great that you've heard the community voice and start working on this! >...and loaded after application startup... Does this mean that a FlexJS module is loaded from the server (same origin as the main app?) by some magic or is it already bundled and delivered with the FlexJS app and

  1   2   >