Hi all,
Jérémy Reynaud, CTO and co-founder of KeepCore, proposes to donated 2 of
their components [1], a dual slider[2] and a progress spinner[3], is there
any interests accepting those components as part of the Flex-sdk ?
I personally think the DualSlider could be a great addition, maybe
I agree.
Harbs
On Apr 15, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
Hi all,
Jérémy Reynaud, CTO and co-founder of KeepCore, proposes to donated 2 of
their components [1], a dual slider[2] and a progress spinner[3], is there
any interests accepting those components as part of the Flex-sdk
+ 1, the dual slider looks very nice and useful,
arnoud
On 15-04-2013, at 15:05, Harbs harbs.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree.
Harbs
On Apr 15, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
Hi all,
Jérémy Reynaud, CTO and co-founder of KeepCore, proposes to donated 2 of
their
On Apr 15, 2013 8:02 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Fine with me. FWIW, I think we do need an official vote. My current
understanding is that the only non-committer contributions that don't
need a
vote are patches.
I am sorry, but I don't think that is a vote is required. Can you
What if some components are or are not willed by some of us, a decision as
to be taken, maybe a lazy vote could stand ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: OmPrakash Muppirala
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 5:09 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Components donation
] On Behalf Of OmPrakash
Muppirala
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 11:09 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Components donation (was: Components donation)
On Apr 15, 2013 8:02 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Fine with me. FWIW, I think we do need an official vote. My current
On 4/15/13 8:09 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 15, 2013 8:02 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Fine with me. FWIW, I think we do need an official vote. My current
understanding is that the only non-committer contributions that don't
need a
vote are
On 4/15/13 8:27 AM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.com wrote:
What if some components are or are not willed by some of us, a decision as
to be taken, maybe a lazy vote could stand ?
See my reply to Om. Apache does have a process as part of the IP clearance
that implies that a vote is
So that means IP donations require a vote and going through the IP
clearance. But what about commiters already signed the Apache agreement...
Does that require a vote or just a public showing and a general consensus?
Or are we voting on those too?
-Mark
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Alex
I agree, I was doing minor changes, bug fixes and such just CTR. The
feature addition I have available, I put on the thread first (although I
did a sloppy job of providing a timely code example) thinking it was a good
practice to show before commiting. So waiting a few days for feed back
then
Hi,
I agree, I was doing minor changes, bug fixes and such just CTR. The
feature addition I have available, I put on the thread first (although I
did a sloppy job of providing a timely code example) thinking it was a good
practice to show before commiting.
Showing the changes to the code
I agree. In my case I have example of it's use with view-source [1], a
github whiteboard of the modified flex-sdk [2], the code pulled out of the
components [3][4][5]. I could change to a diff if that would make things
easier.
So now we have steps up to this point. Should a JIRA issue been
12 matches
Mail list logo
