Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Now I can open that link, Thanks very much for your help! -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I just fixed the SWF version. Working on the JS version now. -Alex On 9/26/17, 6:55 AM, "yishayw" wrote: >The address is ok but tags.json isn't found... > > > > > >-- >Sent from: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

The address is ok but tags.json isn't found... -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Thanks for your reply! But there is a problem, I can not open the two links in: http://people.apache.org/~pent/asdoc-flexjs/index.html Are these docs moved to another new place, so it can not be opend now? Or is it just my network problem? If the address has been updated, please tell me where it

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Yes and No. See this [1]. [1] http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/How-To-Start-Converting-A-Browser-Project-to-FlexJS-td15946.html#a15950 -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hi, I just want to look for some introduction of FlexJs. Is there any document to show the construction of FlexJs? Like which package contains which class, label or method, 'cause I am a new, and want to know more about this. If there are some documents, please tell me, thanks very much. --

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Sorry Thanks Erik > On 4 Sep 2017, at 09:49, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > Remember to vote in the [VOTE] thread. > > EdB > > > > 2017-09-04 9:29 GMT+02:00 Jose Barragan >: > >> I think is the best

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Remember to vote in the [VOTE] thread. EdB 2017-09-04 9:29 GMT+02:00 Jose Barragan : > I think is the best option. > Hope I could be part of this. > > +1 > __ > *Jose Barragan* > *Senior Software Engineer* > Codeoscopic > +34 912 94 80 80

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I think is the best option. Hope I could be part of this. +1 __ Jose Barragan Senior Software Engineer Codeoscopic +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener información

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I think this is a very good idea, thanks for proposing a fork I'l be voting +1 to this C. 2017-08-31 23:43 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki : > Let's wait for the VOTE thread and focus on Fork. > > Agree with Michael that talking about the name should be in a separate >

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Let's wait for the VOTE thread and focus on Fork. Agree with Michael that talking about the name should be in a separate thread. Piotr 2017-08-31 23:39 GMT+02:00 Michael Schmalle : > I think the name thing should be in a separate thread. > > Mike > > On Thu, Aug 31,

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I think the name thing should be in a separate thread. Mike On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not > confuse our users. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hehe looks like this is a thing already: https://phoenix.apache.org/ Oh well, never mind :-( On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not > confuse our users. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

That's a conflict. We would want a nonconflicting name that will not confuse our users. Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 31, 2017, at 2:25 PM, Harbs wrote: > > Well, Phoenix is already a thing: > http://phoenixframework.org/ > > Not sure

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Well, Phoenix is already a thing: http://phoenixframework.org/ Not sure about trademark issues… > On Aug 31, 2017, at 11:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > wrote: > > I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. > Its a play on the words

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

OK, if we're throwing names out there, here is one: BendJS EdB On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. > Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-) > > Thanks, > Om >

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I am for this fork. I hope to maybe be added to the project after things get settled. Cheers and good luck! Chris -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I forgot to mention that I am all for this fork. I have a couple projects that I want to use this with and then I can work on the compiler for my projects. Interestingly Web Assembly could be a target, I am naive as what it is detail wise, not enough research but compiling to something native

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Eh, I like the idea but you would then pretty much just use the rise from ashes word, because when I first read it I had no idea what it was, my dyslexia thought it was like Feline or Kleenex. (don't ask why I see an L) :) Mike On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:55 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I want to throw in the name FenixJS for the fork. Its a play on the words Flex + Phoenix. You know what that means :-) Thanks, Om

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Exactly. This is not "all the Flex people walking away to do FlexJS". There will continue to be overlap (or not) as people scratch particular itches. Tom On 29/08/17 19:24, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote: There will still be quite a few PMC members on the Flex SDK side. Some will be on both

RE: Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

7:14 AM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex I've already replied via nabble a few hours ago but it seems that it is not synced with the list for whatever reason... so sorry for annoying you: Hi Alex, thanks for this summary, I think this is the right way

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hi, +1 Well prepared abstract. It is definitely the time for making split. I hope that board will understand us and this will go smoothly. Looking forward to the voting. Thank you! Piotr 2017-08-29 16:29 GMT+02:00 Peter Ent : > Hi, > > As an employee of Adobe and a

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hi, As an employee of Adobe and a contributor to Apache FlexJS, I think this new project fork is a good idea. Companies with investment in Flex applications that rely on the Flash Player to deliver their applications to their users will have to look for alternatives in the next couple of years.

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

tinue its support. So I hope that there will be a commitment by Adobe. The fork would be a good opportunity for Adobe to express oneself. Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Fork-FlexJS-from-Apache-Flex-tp64007p64012.html

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I've already replied via nabble a few hours ago but it seems that it is not synced with the list for whatever reason... so sorry for annoying you: Hi Alex, thanks for this summary, I think this is the right way to go! +1 But for me, it sounds a little bit, that Apache Flex is labeled as

RE: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

+1 to Split to FlexJS -Mark K

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I think this is a good idea. The projects and people who work on them are diverging, and have been for a while. Some people clearly wish to contribute to both - but I think for most people it's one or the other. I don't want to get into a big list of who has done what; that's my impression

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hi, As a long standing Flex PMC and committer (5 1/2 years) with a large number of contributions in code [1] (and also elsewhere) I’d like to be added as a PMC and committer to this proposal. I’ve also made a number of contributions directly to FlexJS [2], reviewed releases, spoken at

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

> "thanks" for the "degradation" Please don't start the new project with trouble! I hope that there are no doubts that Chris is an important part of the PMC. Thanks, Olaf

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

"thanks" for the "degradation" -1 Chris On 2017-08-29 06:37, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I (and many others on the PMC) believe there are sufficient reasons to ask > the Apache Board of Directors to create a new Apache Top-Level Project > called Apache FlexJS

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

+1 for the fork. Thanks, Om On Aug 28, 2017 10:05 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > Very well said. > > Let’s do this! :-) > > Harbs > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Alex Harui > wrote: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I (and many others on the PMC) believe

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Very well said. Let’s do this! :-) Harbs > On Aug 29, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I (and many others on the PMC) believe there are sufficient reasons to ask > the Apache Board of Directors to create a new Apache Top-Level Project > called

[DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hi Folks, I (and many others on the PMC) believe there are sufficient reasons to ask the Apache Board of Directors to create a new Apache Top-Level Project called Apache FlexJS separate from Apache Flex. The Apache Board has approved splitting other projects in the past and the proposal below is