>In the spirit of understanding, with a prototype we are going to develop it in
>a non intrusive way to the existing compilers. There is no plan to go hacking
>into the existing code if we don't >have to at this point, plus that would be
>completely stupid IMHO.
>
>I think the proof of concept w
Roland,
Me likey.
Some comments and suggestions inline:
> I think it might make more sense to create a single point of entry for all
> types of compilation. Let's call this point of entry FLEXC (credit:
> Michael Schmalle). Wouldn't it be cleaner to use this FLEXC compiler as a
> sort of factor
+1 on this.
FYI, As the Apache way suggests, itch your scratch... This one is
going to happen and I will be working on it with Roland. We are
looking for constructive criticism, not a blessing. :)
I already have 2 compilers to work with and it's ridiculous one parse
session can't be used
Good day to all of you :)
Hold on, I think this is going to be a long message...
Moving on from the latest discussion between Erik and Frank about the ideal
implementation of AS->JS cross-compilation,
I think its perhaps an interesting venture to talk a little bit about some
possible changes we c
