I'm still trying to understand the pieces...
On 10/3/16, 9:04 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>In github they have these orphan branches to provide content for the
>project website separate from the projects code itself.
>
And AIUI, the good or bad of that of the orphan
e website
seamlessly. Every sub-project could provide parts of the total website
structure and would work and look the same way.
Chris
Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 17:56:11
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re:
3. Oktober 2016 06:39:14
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?
I poked around a bit more, and remain confused.
-Looks like folks already use Jekyll at Apache. Is Jekyll different from
gitpubsub or a component of it?
-Is use of Maven to convert source t
>
>
> Chris
>
>
> Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 22:43:13
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?
>
> It is also possible to u
Hey, I'm not really suggesting one over the other. With the maven-site-approach
we could do all together.
Chris
Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 22:43:13
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS]
I poked around a bit more, and remain confused.
-Looks like folks already use Jekyll at Apache. Is Jekyll different from
gitpubsub or a component of it?
-Is use of Maven to convert source to html an alternative to using Jekyll
or does Maven call Jekyll?
-Does gitpubsub also go to a staging
It is also possible to use ``` for a code block in markdown. No indentation
required. You can also specify the language.
``` actionscript
code
```
- Josh
On Oct 2, 2016 2:54 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
> Well they couldn't give me much info on what others are
.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Datum: 02.10.16 16:19 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?
Thanks for looking into this.
That sounds like a lot of steps. In the little reading I did of GH
e thing is that your plan is missing the
conversion step.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 16:18:52
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?
Thanks for looking into this.
Thanks for looking into this.
That sounds like a lot of steps. In the little reading I did of GH pages,
it appeared that we could create an 'orphan' branch with a specific name
in any of our existing repos and simply pushing files to the branch would
kick off an update of the site.
I would
Ok so I did a little searching:
It seems that in general if you setup a git repo and define an "asf-site"
branch in that (of course have Infra register the repo in their system), stuff
pushed to that branch is automatically published as website.
I just tested it, the maven site plugin is
Well they couldn't give me much info on what others are using, but I dug a
little myself.
So it seems that they use Jekyl to convert Markdown into HTML. There however is
a plugin to use Asciidoctor to do the same.
Having used both Asciidoctor and Markdown, I think Asciidoctor is far more
Ok so it turns out that as long as we use the Apache CMS we can't change to
GIT. Guess this was the reason for still being on GIT.
I have no idea what we really need the CMS for, but as long as we need this, we
seem to be stuck there :-(
Chris
Von: Alex
13 matches
Mail list logo