Re: AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-03 Thread Alex Harui
I'm still trying to understand the pieces... On 10/3/16, 9:04 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >In github they have these orphan branches to provide content for the >project website separate from the projects code itself. > And AIUI, the good or bad of that of the orphan

AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-03 Thread Christofer Dutz
e website seamlessly. Every sub-project could provide parts of the total website structure and would work and look the same way. Chris Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 3. Oktober 2016 17:56:11 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re:

AW: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-03 Thread Christofer Dutz
3. Oktober 2016 06:39:14 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT? I poked around a bit more, and remain confused. -Looks like folks already use Jekyll at Apache. Is Jekyll different from gitpubsub or a component of it? -Is use of Maven to convert source t

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-03 Thread Josh Tynjala
> > > Chris > > > Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 22:43:13 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT? > > It is also possible to u

AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-03 Thread Christofer Dutz
Hey, I'm not really suggesting one over the other. With the maven-site-approach we could do all together. Chris Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 22:43:13 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS]

Re: AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-02 Thread Alex Harui
I poked around a bit more, and remain confused. -Looks like folks already use Jekyll at Apache. Is Jekyll different from gitpubsub or a component of it? -Is use of Maven to convert source to html an alternative to using Jekyll or does Maven call Jekyll? -Does gitpubsub also go to a staging

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-02 Thread Josh Tynjala
It is also possible to use ``` for a code block in markdown. No indentation required. You can also specify the language. ``` actionscript code ``` - Josh On Oct 2, 2016 2:54 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: > Well they couldn't give me much info on what others are

AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-02 Thread Christofer Dutz
. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> Datum: 02.10.16 16:19 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT? Thanks for looking into this. That sounds like a lot of steps. In the little reading I did of GH

AW: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-02 Thread Christofer Dutz
e thing is that your plan is missing the conversion step. Chris Von: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 16:18:52 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT? Thanks for looking into this.

Re: AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-02 Thread Alex Harui
Thanks for looking into this. That sounds like a lot of steps. In the little reading I did of GH pages, it appeared that we could create an 'orphan' branch with a specific name in any of our existing repos and simply pushing files to the branch would kick off an update of the site. I would

AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-02 Thread Christofer Dutz
Ok so I did a little searching: It seems that in general if you setup a git repo and define an "asf-site" branch in that (of course have Infra register the repo in their system), stuff pushed to that branch is automatically published as website. I just tested it, the maven site plugin is

AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-02 Thread Christofer Dutz
Well they couldn't give me much info on what others are using, but I dug a little myself. So it seems that they use Jekyl to convert Markdown into HTML. There however is a plugin to use Asciidoctor to do the same. Having used both Asciidoctor and Markdown, I think Asciidoctor is far more

AW: [DISCUSS] Switch the site repo to GIT?

2016-10-01 Thread Christofer Dutz
Ok so it turns out that as long as we use the Apache CMS we can't change to GIT. Guess this was the reason for still being on GIT. I have no idea what we really need the CMS for, but as long as we need this, we seem to be stuck there :-( Chris Von: Alex