+1 non-binding
Hi,
Current results:
3 +1 binding
1 +0 binding
1 -1 binding
1 +1 (non binding)
Does anything have any further objections or want to do more testing before I
officially make this a release?
Thanks,
Justin
+1 so far it seems really cool
On Feb 25, 2013 5:44 AM, "Om" wrote:
> I change my vote to +0 given that we agreed to fix the issue I raised in a
> future release.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/24/13 9:17 PM, "Om" wrote:
> >
> > >
I change my vote to +0 given that we agreed to fix the issue I raised in a
future release.
Thanks,
Om
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/24/13 9:17 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
> > I was planning to run the Mustella tests overnight. Let me know if you
> have
> > enough votes
On 2/24/13 9:17 PM, "Om" wrote:
> I was planning to run the Mustella tests overnight. Let me know if you have
> enough votes dont need me to..
>
I think you are currently a -1. If we have enough +1's, do you still want
your -1 in the official record or do you want to withdraw it or change to
I was planning to run the Mustella tests overnight. Let me know if you have
enough votes dont need me to..
Om
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/24/13 2:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I am cool with that.
> >
> > Mind changing your vote? We don;t
On 2/24/13 2:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I am cool with that.
>
> Mind changing your vote? We don;t have enough +1 to release this yet and
> nothing to add to a RC4.
You should have yourself, Nick and me at +1.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe
Hi,
> Let me get home and do some more testing first? Maybe in another 12 hours.
More testing is always good.
Thanks,
Justin
Let me get home and do some more testing first? Maybe in another 12 hours.
Thanks,
Om
On Feb 24, 2013 2:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I am cool with that.
>
> Mind changing your vote? We don;t have enough +1 to release this yet and
> nothing to add to a RC4.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Hi,
> I am cool with that.
Mind changing your vote? We don;t have enough +1 to release this yet and
nothing to add to a RC4.
Thanks,
Justin
On Feb 23, 2013 4:53 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk
to a
> > special directory and then building the release artifact would violate
this
> > rule?
> Well there's no way we going to make it match on windows and OSX.
>
Hi,
> Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk to a
> special directory and then building the release artifact would violate this
> rule?
Well there's no way we going to make it match on windows and OSX.
Thinking about again I actually like the release managers name i
Sounds like a dubious reason to me. Writing a script to copy the sdk to a
special directory and then building the release artifact would violate this
rule?
This would be much easier than writing a tool to fix the paths after the
build process.
Om
On Feb 23, 2013 3:29 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
Mac users shouldn't have to work outside the user folder
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Om wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> >> What would it take to get the CI server to
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> > HI,
> >
> >> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
> > We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may
> be
> > against policy to sign and re
On 2/22/13 5:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> HI,
>
>> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
> We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may be
> against policy to sign and release them.
>
>> And what would its path look like?
> A little ugly a
HI,
> What would it take to get the CI server to generate the RCs?
We currently a release build from the develop branch but I think it may be
against policy to sign and release them.
> And what would its path look like?
A little ugly and Hudson would get the blame :-)
f:\hudson\hudson-slave\wor
On Feb 22, 2013 5:07 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> As far as I can see nothing was decided.
> This point release is not meant to solve all issues, see if this issue
can be resolved for 4.10?
>
> Justin
>
I am cool with that.
Thanks,
Om
Hi,
>> As far as I can see nothing was decided.
This point release is not meant to solve all issues, see if this issue can be
resolved for 4.10?
Justin
On 2/22/13 3:47 PM, "Om" wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> We decided that we will be using a more official directory path when
>>> cutting releases [1], [2]
>>
>> As far as I can see nothing was decided.
>>
>> Justin
>>
>
> What is your pro
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > We decided that we will be using a more official directory path when
> > cutting releases [1], [2]
>
> As far as I can see nothing was decided.
>
> Justin
>
What is your proposal going forward?
Om
Hi,
> We decided that we will be using a more official directory path when
> cutting releases [1], [2]
As far as I can see nothing was decided.
Justin
ri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Frédéric THOMAS >wrote:
>
> > oups !
> >
> >
> > -Message d'origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS
> > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:21 AM
> > To: Alex Harui
> >
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
origine- From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:21 AM
> To: Alex Harui
>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
> Do you think it is a bug in the tests or in the release source?
>>
>
> AFAIK, that's just tests, nothing relative to th
oups !
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:21 AM
To: Alex Harui
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Do you think it is a bug in the tests or in the release source?
AFAIK, that's just tests, nothing relative to the framework
it would mean we delay the release to next week, what do you
think guys ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:18 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Hi Alex,
I have a bit of time this morning to take
7;origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:01 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
On 2/20/13 8:20 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
It still happens besause of the headerStyleName of the DateChooser, I
guess
I should re-generate
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:01 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
On 2/20/13 8:20 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
It still happens besause of the headerStyleName of the DateChooser, I
guess
I should re-generate the image
On 2/20/13 8:20 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> It still happens besause of the headerStyleName of the DateChooser, I guess
> I should re-generate the images with that, what do you think ?
Hmm, I'm not sure how that happened. I guess I must have hit undo and some
point. I called the style "no
On 2/20/13 4:48 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
Hi,
-1 at the moment as I still have failed tests and I can't solve them, Alex
saied he's going to have a look, I sent him the images.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, February 2
My mustella tests failed last night (issues with my flash player after an
update). I'm going to try and rerun it tonight.
On Feb 20, 2013 7:10 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding) from me also.
>
> Anyone else have some time to try this out?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
e:
> Hi,
>
> -1 at the moment as I still have failed tests and I can't solve them, Alex
> saied he's going to have a look, I sent him the images.
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Justin Mclean
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:
Hi,
-1 at the moment as I still have failed tests and I can't solve them, Alex
saied he's going to have a look, I sent him the images.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:09 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VO
Hi,
+1 (binding) from me also.
Anyone else have some time to try this out?
Thanks,
Justin
9 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
I have to turn off the computer for tonight, but I took a quick look.
For bubble, most of it looks like anti-aliasing differences, but I'm
surprised the font at the bottom is showing a different as well. I'll try
t
your adobe email.
> Yes, I'm on the release4.9
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:04 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
> My tests did not fail on BubblePr
Just sent the attachements of the bubble and one of the
LangPacks/Japanese/tests on your adobe email.
Yes, I'm on the release4.9
-Message d'origine-
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:04 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9
an" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
>
> There are only very minor changes from RC2 including updating the
> RELEASE_NOTES and REAMDE files, fixing the ASDocs logo and adding FLEX-29002
> (RTE fix for Popup
rédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
>
> Started...
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Justin Mclean
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:02 AM
> To: dev@flex.apach
y fix has
> been applied (but I can't do that tonight, I've got my tournament).
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> From: Frédéric THOMAS
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:05 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex
-3 or -4 and when I check them with
ImageDiffAIR, there're no differences, what does it mean ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Started...
-Message d
with
ImageDiffAIR, there're no differences, what does it mean ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Started...
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin M
Hi,
> I'm going to try to do a run tonight.
Thanks.
Justin
Started...
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:02 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Hi,
I did find one Flex Unit issue in that it's missing some of the new
locales that the Apache Flex SDK now has
I'm going to try to do a run tonight.
On 2/18/13 8:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So far on OSX I've:
> 1. checked the md5 hashes and that the files are correctly signed - all good.
> 2. src compiles with an ant build.
> 3. run ant framework-rsls and ant other.locales.
> 4. Run makeAp
Hi,
it's a Flex Builder integrated Flex Unit issue not a Flex Unit issue as such.
Will see if I can find a way to fix it.
Justin
Hi,
>> I did find one Flex Unit issue in that it's missing some of the new locales
>> that the Apache Flex SDK now has, but that was the same for the 4.9.0
>> release.
> Are you talking about apache rb ? experimental rb or another one ?
Neither.
It's the Flex Unit that missing localisation. eg
I'll have time to mavenize it
and run it against my air project before I go in London (on thursday).
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 5:29 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3
Hi,
So far on OSX
Hi,
So far on OSX I've:
1. checked the md5 hashes and that the files are correctly signed - all good.
2. src compiles with an ant build.
3. run ant framework-rsls and ant other.locales.
4. Run makeApacheFlexForFlashBuilder.sh to create an SDK that FB can use.
5. Set up a largish project to use thi
Hi,
This is a Apache Flex 4.9.1 RC3. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
There are only very minor changes from RC2 including updating the RELEASE_NOTES
and REAMDE files, fixing the ASDocs logo and adding FLEX-29002 (RTE fix for
PopupManager).
The release candidate can be found here
50 matches
Mail list logo
