Re: Mustella mobile tests (was: rc_flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 63 - Still Failing:)

2014-12-28 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
from > >> > 8 hrs to 11 hrs. We'll see. > >> > > >> > EdB > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:23 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > >> > wrote: > >> >> I believe I have checked

Re: Mustella mobile tests (was: rc_flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 63 - Still Failing:)

2014-12-28 Thread Erik de Bruin
e switch took the main run from >> > 8 hrs to 11 hrs. We'll see. >> > >> > EdB >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:23 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >> > wrote: >> >> I believe I have checked in fixes to re

Re: Mustella mobile tests (was: rc_flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 63 - Still Failing:)

2014-12-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
e Java JDK 1.6. Using 1.8 didn't > > give any problems, but it looks like the switch took the main run from > > 8 hrs to 11 hrs. We'll see. > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:23 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > wrote

Re: Mustella mobile tests (was: rc_flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 63 - Still Failing:)

2014-12-22 Thread Erik de Bruin
hrs to 11 hrs. We'll see. > > EdB > > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:23 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > wrote: >> I believe I have checked in fixes to resolve all the breaking Mustella >> Mobile tests. >> >> Hope to see everything pass on the next run. >

Re: Mustella mobile tests (was: rc_flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 63 - Still Failing:)

2014-12-22 Thread Erik de Bruin
n fixes to resolve all the breaking Mustella > Mobile tests. > > Hope to see everything pass on the next run. > > Thanks, > Om > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 1:12 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 20, 2014 10:41 AM, "Erik de Bruin&q

Mustella mobile tests (was: rc_flex-sdk_mustella-mobile - Build # 63 - Still Failing:)

2014-12-22 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I believe I have checked in fixes to resolve all the breaking Mustella Mobile tests. Hope to see everything pass on the next run. Thanks, Om On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 1:12 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > > On Dec 20, 2014 10:41 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > > > > OK

Re: Mustella mobile tests

2013-04-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I think this should be sufficient. I am unable to run Mustella right now. > Did that work for you? Well it runs the tests so I guess that's working - just not 100% if there another option I should be using. Justin

Re: Mustella mobile tests

2013-04-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
I think this should be sufficient. I am unable to run Mustella right now. Did that work for you? Thanks, Om On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > local.properties has quite a few properties that needs to be uncommented > for a mobile run. > > All I needed to change

Re: Mustella mobile tests

2013-04-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > local.properties has quite a few properties that needs to be uncommented for > a mobile run. All I needed to change was: use_apollo=true run_mobile_tests=true target_os_name=android device_name=mac Is there something I'm missing? Thanks, Justin

Re: Mustella mobile tests

2013-04-24 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
stin Mclean wrote: > > > Hi, > > Anything special required to run the mustella mobile tests? > > ./mini_run.sh tests/mobile/DynamicSplashScreen > Not a mobile server, and tests/mobile/DynamicSplashScreen is a mobile > directory. Will not run it > Nothing was found to include. Will exit > > Thanks, > Justin > >

Re: Mustella mobile tests

2013-04-24 Thread Alex Harui
Instructions should be in the wiki. Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone. Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Anything special required to run the mustella mobile tests? ./mini_run.sh tests/mobile/DynamicSplashScreen Not a mobile server, and tests/mobile/DynamicSplashScreen

Mustella mobile tests

2013-04-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Anything special required to run the mustella mobile tests? ./mini_run.sh tests/mobile/DynamicSplashScreen Not a mobile server, and tests/mobile/DynamicSplashScreen is a mobile directory. Will not run it Nothing was found to include. Will exit Thanks, Justin