It probably does, since they are following the ECMA standard ATM. Would be
nice though.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:22 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
Does function
[mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
the main thrust of the language was a totally new language geared for
functional programming, and then some backward compatibility stuff to
make
it seem
, 2014 11:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
the main thrust of the language was a totally new language geared for
functional programming, and then some backward compatibility stuff to
make
it seem more like ActionScript.
I wouldn't characterize
Silly ideas are always good ideas
Let s see where this take us, Flex 5 vs Flex JS? or Flex 5 will be Flex JS?
We can enter in a some conspiracy theories that that was always the plan of
Adobe :)
But with some new fresh blood in the web maybe will be also good for the flex
project...
Flex JS is a good approach to some kind of Flex projects, but a lot of
projects are not to be translated to JS at all... Then... We better think
about a FLEX 5 release out the way JS bullshit world...
2014/1/22 Miguel Ferreira miguel.cd.ferre...@hotmail.com
Silly ideas are always good
DarkStone wrote
I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was dropped:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
Now they reopen AS4 on GitHub, what does it mean?
From the read me on the github project: Adobe is publishing the
ActionScript 4
Thanks for the info, Brady.
Well the good news is we don't have to start from the ground up to rewrite the
Flex framework.
DarkStone
2014-01-23
At 2014-01-23 00:15:24,bkelley brady.kel...@cleantelligent.com wrote:
DarkStone wrote
I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was
Since this is hosted publicly but not donated, I assume we cannot cherry pick
any good changes from as4...
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: bkelley [mailto:brady.kel...@cleantelligent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:15 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActionScript 4
22, 2014 11:15 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
DarkStone wrote
I believe Adobe said in the flash runtime roadmap that AS4 was dropped:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html
Now they reopen AS4 on GitHub, what does it mean
in the same
direction as ASC 2 which started getting rid of things we use.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:20 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
I'm not sure what the rules
for us. Assuming it wasn't in the same
direction as ASC 2 which started getting rid of things we use.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 12:20 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActionScript 4? What the hell
[mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:32 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
Well using the assumption that AS 4 would be an improvement in some
area's from AS3 even if it was an incomplete work. While I haven't
looked at it yet, I
@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
Adobe designed AS4 to be the language for a new Flash runtime (V12) that it
was working on but dropped. (I was working on the AS4 compiler then.) Not all
features of AS4 can be implemented -- at least not easily and efficiently
ints and returned a String. It also added array types like
var a:[]int;
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:06 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
On 1/22/14 10:55 AM, Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
the main thrust of the language was a totally new language geared for
functional programming, and then some
[mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:20 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: ActionScript 4? What the hell?
the main thrust of the language was a totally new language geared for
functional programming, and then some backward compatibility stuff to
make
it seem more like
16 matches
Mail list logo
