On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Sean Thayne wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> Your correct, but at the same time. If you play with Feathers, you will
> realize quickly they don't really give you a UI. They give you controllers
> for a UI. You still need to code up ever object that is going to be
> displaye
On 2/12/14 11:25 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Feb 12, 2014 11:05 AM, "Sean Thayne" wrote:
>>
>> I think it would be interesting, but not really realistic.
>>
>> The creator of Starling was unable to use the standard Flash Event and
>EventDispatcher. So he instead created his own. That
ipient classes for example.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jun Heider
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Sent: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk
>>
>>
&g
Text auto complete messed that up ...
*mail = mxml
*VP = VM
*recipient = rpc
-Original Message-
From: f...@dfguy.us
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Sent: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk
I did a flex mobile app and also compiled an example feathers
ies in pure action script
projects as well by including some of the flex swc files and instantiating
classes in actionscript. I think I did this with some of the recipient classes
for example.
David
-Original Message-
From: Jun Heider
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Sent: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:4
he.org
Sent: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Flex vs. Actionscript Mobile Benchmarsk
On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sean Thayne wrote:
> I think it's pretty well known that Flex is not the fastest system for
> Air/Flash. It's just the most feature complete system. Starling
Hi Jun,
Your correct, but at the same time. If you play with Feathers, you will
realize quickly they don't really give you a UI. They give you
controllers for a UI. You still need to code up ever object that is
going to be displayed. Feathers does make it easier, but I'd really say
it only gi
On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Sean Thayne wrote:
> I think it's pretty well known that Flex is not the fastest system for
> Air/Flash. It's just the most feature complete system. Starling/AS3 is much
> faster than Flex. But it doesn't have any real components/features. So you
> need to code up e
I think it's pretty well known that Flex is not the fastest system for
Air/Flash. It's just the most feature complete system. Starling/AS3 is much
faster than Flex. But it doesn't have any real components/features. So you
need to code up everything from the ground.
-Sean Thayne
On Wed, Feb 12, 2
