Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi, > Hmm, no that isn't correct. Isn't correct how? It's what the scripts do, they copy the ide/flashbuilder/config/*.xml files over the framework ones. We've made 3 releases with them working that way. > I'm pretty sure the AIR and probably Mobile runs will completely fail. They seem to run

RE: [jira] [Assigned] (FLEX-33608) Add function "removeAllEventListener()"

Yeah, I went down a rabit hole with mine replacing the whole thing and adding some methods to it. But if you check [1] for the working code and you can see an example of it [2]. You don't need to apply it to FlexSprite directly, it was just easy to test tons of components at one time. You

RE: [jira] [Assigned] (FLEX-33608) Add function "removeAllEventListener()"

Oh wait that was one version of it... here is the newer one [1] [1] https://github.com/KesslerConsulting/example/blob/master/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/FlexSprite.as. -Mark -Original Message- From: Kessler CTR Mark J [mailto:mark.kessler@usmc.mil] Sent: Monday, July

Re: IntelliJ IDEA and Flex CSS/skinning

Thank you for the feedback! Indeed, there's only one way for smart skin creation in IntelliJ IDEA: [1] And code assistance is not always perfect in Flex CSS files. Thank you for the YouTrack issue. Can you please create a short sample for each feature that you ask for? Paste it as a comment or at

Re: IntelliJ IDEA and Flex CSS/skinning

Hi Alexander. 2013/7/22 Alexander Doroshko > Thank you for the feedback! > Indeed, there's only one way for smart skin creation in IntelliJ IDEA: [1] > And code assistance is not always perfect in Flex CSS files. > Thank you for the YouTrack issue. Can you please create a short sample for > each

Re: IntelliJ IDEA and Flex CSS/skinning

Hey guys, on a related note, I had also opened this ticket ( http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-107803 ) because of lack of namespace support in the CSS for Flex development. I believe most of the Flash/Flex development issues in IDEA are related to the fact that Jetbrains is using the same

Re: Flex mobile performance - Question on itemRenderers

Turning of cacheAsBitmap -> Scrolling got much slower (in the renderer there is nothing changing/animating) Am I right when I think all the fxg files are cached and using bitmap images won't have any advantage (at least when cachingAsBitmap)? Turning of usage of virtual layout -> Can't see any

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

On 7/22/13 12:11 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Hmm, no that isn't correct. >Isn't correct how? It's what the scripts do, they copy the >ide/flashbuilder/config/*.xml files over the framework ones. We've made 3 >releases with them working that way. It isn't correct that you "must" convert

Re: Flex mobile performance - Question on itemRenderers

On 7/22/13 6:16 AM, "Christian Kiefer" wrote: >Turning of cacheAsBitmap >-> Scrolling got much slower (in the renderer there is nothing >changing/animating) >Am I right when I think all the fxg files are cached and using bitmap >images won't have any advantage (at least when cachingAsBitmap)? W

Re: Visual Studio support

Mark, Do you use amethyst design editor at all? I tried this back in Amethyst version 1 and it didn't fair too well. I noted on their site that they are version 2 how which is great. Any experience using the design editor? Thanks, Chris On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Mark Kessler wrote:

Re: IntelliJ IDEA and Flex CSS/skinning

On 22.07.2013 15:45, Carlos Rovira wrote: Can you please create a short sample for each feature that you ask for? Paste it as a comment or attachment for the issue: [2]. You refer a skin file sample? or an entire project? The features are more described as "usability" so please let me know what

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

This is pretty important IMHO. I know there were a lot of discussions about that early on. -Nick On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > We can go ask the mentors again, but I think it is still > important/required to have a configuration where the files are kept > separate

Re: Swiz Framework Donation

Hi Chris, how is going the internal mail to the rest of swiz contributors? There are consensus to donate ownerhip to Apache Flex Thanks for any update regarding this Carlos 2013/7/5 Chris Scott > Yes UM has no ownership, I stared the project prior to working with them, > and my ownership is

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

+1 just get the time to construct from scratch, create a project in intellij and was testing various things a some new enhacemnts (like the dataprovider ones) and all goes well. Great work so far!! :) Carlos 2013/7/22 Nicholas Kwiatkowski > This is pretty important IMHO. I know there were a

Re: Visual Studio support

Not atm I haven't used the Amythyst designer in a long while. I use the VS express at home and it wont accept the third party plugins. -Mark On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Chris Martin wrote: > Mark, > > Do you use amethyst design editor at all? I tried this back in Amethyst > version 1

Re: [Marketing] - publicity for the new Apache Flex v 4.10

Bump... We could use more participation from developers/users in this thread. This will be very useful when we write our marketing/PR material. Thanks, Om On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 9:16 PM, FRANKLIN GARZON wrote: > Great apache community, you are doing good job, we are waiting the > release, we

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

HI, So what exactly do you think needs to be changed? Are the current config file and templates used for generating them correct? Here's a list of all the config files. ./frameworks/flex-config-template.xml ./frameworks/flex-config.xml ./ide/flashbuilder/config/flex-config.xml ./frameworks/air-c

Re: [Marketing] - publicity for the new Apache Flex v 4.10

Hi, > • What business problems can a business manager solve with v 4.10 that > weren't possible to solve with v 4.9.1? Better for developer productivity - less RTEs and work arounds required. Justin

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

On 7/22/13 4:27 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >HI, > >So what exactly do you think needs to be changed? I don't think anything needs to change in Git. I think if your local working copy reflects what is in Git and you haven't run the installer or any of the ide scripts in that working copy, then

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi, >> Related question: what does 'git status' show for your > working copy? Doesn't it show that frameworks/air-config.xml is modified? Nope: # On branch release4.10.0 nothing to commit, working directory clean Perhaps we have an issue with .gitignore?? Justin

FXG vs SVG

Ok, I don't think it is any secret that Adobe is moving heavily toward web standards, and that FXG is now gone from the CC applications, not likely to be back soon. I've heard rumors they may bring it back as an extension, but likely not as some of the libraries used are 32 bit and therefore incom

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi, > Perhaps we have an issue with .gitignore?? Yep it contains: frameworks/flex-config.xml frameworks/air-config.xml frameworks/airmobile-config.xml Can someone explain why these were added? We should not be ignoring anything that packaged up into a release. Justin

Re: FXG vs SVG

Hi, > With that in mind, and since it appears the tooling from Adobe is moving > toward SVG, would it behove us to also retool the Flex SDK to work with SVG > natively? The Flex SDK already supports SVG, it was marked as "deprecated" but that was warning removed for the 4.10 release. Can you exp

Re: swf-version issue

Hi, > Maybe you can create the Linux version also? Done. Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

Hi, Just making a new release candidate, so consider this vote closed. The changes to the new RC are mostly minor being config xml AIR path changes and minor changes to README and RELEASE NOTES, there have been no SDK code changes. Thanks, Justin

Re: FXG vs SVG

Ah, I didn't see that... I'll have to take a look into it. On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > With that in mind, and since it appears the tooling from Adobe is moving > > toward SVG, would it behove us to also retool the Flex SDK to work with > SVG > > natively? >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Flex 4.10.0 Release Candidate 2

On 7/22/13 6:36 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Perhaps we have an issue with .gitignore?? > >Yep it contains: >frameworks/flex-config.xml >frameworks/air-config.xml >frameworks/airmobile-config.xml > >Can someone explain why these were added? We should not be ignoring >anything that packa