Re: [FlexJX][Falcon] Binding support fixes/improvements

Sounds great! Looking forward to it. It might be better in the future if you ask more questions as you go along. I think the compiler already does IEventDispatcher although I wouldn't be surprised if the current code has bugs, so discussing early can help make sure you are spending your cycles

Re: [jira] [Updated] (FLEX-35123) DOM XSS vulnerability in history.js

Hi, Given this is public (but IMO not serious) should we fix it and make a point release of the Flex SDK? Simplest option IMO would be apply the patch to the 4.15 release branch and make a 4.15.1 release, rather than make a full release from the develop branch. That being said the last

[FlexJX][Falcon] Binding support fixes/improvements

I thought I should provide a bit of advance notice here... I had wanted to work on some improvements in the reflection area, and I have made a start on this (and will certainly get back to it), but I got quite distracted once I saw that there was still some work left in Bindings. I didn't see

Re: [FlexJS] Maven compiler build error

On 8/26/16, 9:30 PM, "OK" wrote: >Thanks, the compiler is build successfully now. >Is the reason for the failure that somebody has published not tested >compiler modifications? All the tests run from Ant. Nobody has taken the time to get them to work from Maven. The

Re: [jira] [Updated] (FLEX-35123) DOM XSS vulnerability in history.js

On 8/26/16, 5:10 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Given this is public (but IMO not serious) should we fix it and make a >point release of the Flex SDK? > >Simplest option IMO would be apply the patch to the 4.15 release branch >and make a 4.15.1 release, rather

Re: AW: [FlexJS] Integrate FontAwesome with FlexJS

On 8/25/16, 11:56 PM, "OK" wrote: >Got it, thanks for explanation Alex! > >But one question is left: >What is the difference between just loading a font and embedding a font? >I thought "embedded" means that the font is delivered with our Flex >application so that it

Re: AW: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

I've followed the maven discussions here and even if I did not understood so much I've understand that you've invest an unbeliveable effort to get this working. I don't know anything about maven, but I' promise that I'll will give maven the first try ;-) Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

Alex Harui wrote > We are trying to reduce the "grapple" and "afraid". In theory, you can > use Maven or Ant. > To use Maven, you can follow > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Building+FlexJS+with+Maven > > To use Ant, you can follow >

AW: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

And I would strongly suggest to give the Maven way a try ;-) We put an enormous amount of work into making that as easy as possible. Chris Von: OK Gesendet: Freitag, 26. August 2016 07:53:18 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW:

Re: AW: Committing to the dev branch without testing

Ah, ok. For standard Flex SDK, try the README instructions. Thanks, -Alex On 8/26/16, 1:48 AM, "OK" wrote: >Alex Harui wrote >> We are trying to reduce the "grapple" and "afraid". In theory, you can >> use Maven or Ant. >> To use Maven, you can follow >>

Re: [FlexJS] AMF support starting with in ECMAScript6?

On 8/26/16, 1:27 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote: >Hi, > > >I am currently working on my FlexJS Talks slides and as part of that I am >discussing the History of ECMAScript. While digging up the changes in >ECMAScript, I noticed that version 6 introduced typed arrays. It

[FlexJS] Maven compiler build error

Hi, I followed the maven build instructions [1] step by step. At step 4.d. "Build the compiler" I get some errors [2] and it seems for me that the build fails. Did I miss something? Thanks, Olaf [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Building+FlexJS+with+Maven [2] Build log:

Re: [FlexJS] Maven compiler build error

Hi, > I followed the maven build instructions [1] step by step. At step 4.d. > "Build the compiler" I get some errors [2] and it seems for me that the > build fails. You have some tests failing (it may or may not be valid issues) to get past that you may want to try -DskipTests=true Justin

Re: AW: [FlexJS] Integrate FontAwesome with FlexJS

>so FlexJS can load a font via @fontface Until now I've just used fonts without thinking about where it comes from ;-) So while trying to understand how it works I found this from an previous post [1]: "What we do support in FlexJS is CSS @font-face for external font files. In the SWF version

Re: AW: [FlexJS] Integrate FontAwesome with FlexJS

On 8/25/16, 11:27 PM, "OK" wrote: >>so FlexJS can load a font via @fontface > >Until now I've just used fonts without thinking about where it comes from >;-) >So while trying to understand how it works I found this from an previous >post [1]: > >"What we do support in

Re: AW: [FlexJS] Integrate FontAwesome with FlexJS

Got it, thanks for explanation Alex! But one question is left: What is the difference between just loading a font and embedding a font? I thought "embedded" means that the font is delivered with our Flex application so that it don't rely to the client machine [1]. But if we able to just load the