Re: iss...@flex.apache.org list now active

What about moving Mustella build fails to issues as well? On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.comwrote: Works better, thanks -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 5:24 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: Mustella VM emails to 'issues'?

commits@ or issues@ I would say what is better but what is sure is it pollutes the dev list. Those 2 lists are followed as well by committers or at least PMCs, otherwise what do you thing about another list builds@ ? does it worth ? -Fred -Message d'origine- From: Alex Harui Sent:

Re: Mustella VM emails to 'issues'?

I think commits@f.a.o would be the best place. Builds break because of bad commits (most of the times) Moreover an additional list (ex. builds@f.a.o) would be a bit of an overkill. Thanks, Om On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Frédéric THOMAS webdoubl...@hotmail.comwrote: commits@ or issues@ I

Installer now supports nightly builds!

Thanks to Erik's fix for the MD5 checksum comparison issue, we now have support for installing nightly releases from the Apache build server. I fixed a couple of bugs and did some cosmetic changes. It looks like the Installer is ready for its next release. How is the Flex SDK release looking?

Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-air #10

See http://localhost:8080/job/flex-sdk_mustella-air/10/ -- [...truncated 7469 lines...] [java] FAIL: apollo/spark/components/Window/properties/window_properties_height_tests height_test4_windowedApplicationSkin [java] FAIL:

Re: Installer now supports nightly builds!

On 6/29/13 12:39 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to Erik's fix for the MD5 checksum comparison issue, we now have support for installing nightly releases from the Apache build server. Excellent! Thanks for doing that. I fixed a couple of bugs and did some cosmetic

Jenkins build is back to normal : flex-sdk_asdoc #52

See https://builds.apache.org/job/flex-sdk_asdoc/52/

Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella-mobile #15

See http://localhost:8080/job/flex-sdk_mustella-mobile/15/ -- [...truncated 19097 lines...] [java] clobberProcess true [java] ClobberProcess, destroying process [java] unpacked result:

Re: Mustella VM emails to 'issues'?

Ok, I think commits@ is it. Om's argument hits home, builds break because of commits :-) If no major objections, I'll implement this the coming week. EdB On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 9:27 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote: I think commits@f.a.o would be the best place. Builds

Re: Installer now supports nightly builds!

Om, Excellent work, thanks! EdB On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote: On 6/29/13 12:39 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala bigosma...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to Erik's fix for the MD5 checksum comparison issue, we now have support for installing nightly releases from the

Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #193

See http://localhost:8080/job/flex-sdk_mustella/193/ -- Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on WindowsSlave in workspace http://localhost:8080/job/flex-sdk_mustella/ws/ Checkout:flex-sdk_mustella /

Re: Mustella VM emails to 'issues'?

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comwrote: Hi, I was just wondering: would it be better if I have Jenkins send the Mustella run emails to 'issues@'? +0 from me. Someone may break the build and not be aware of it, but if others think that's OK go ahead,

Re: Mustella VM emails to 'issues'?

And just to correct a minor issue with Om's statement: I sure he meant Jenkins, not JIRA :-) EdB On Saturday, June 29, 2013, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.comjavascript:; wrote: Hi, I was just wondering: would it be