Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-08-29 Thread Alex Harui
Hmm. Somehow the output thinks that setTimeout is not a native function and is looking for a file to match it. How is setTimeout being used in your code? I am done working for today. Will check tomorrow. -Alex On 8/29/17, 10:47 PM, "lizhi" wrote: > > > >Alex Harui-2 wrote >> Hi Lizhi, >> >

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-08-29 Thread lizhi
Alex Harui-2 wrote > Hi Lizhi, > > Please post a link to the entire console output from the compile. You can > try to use paste.apache.org. Or pastebin.com or other similar service. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 8/29/17, 10:10 PM, "lizhi" < > sliz@ > > wrote: > >>hi alex harui.which file err

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-08-29 Thread Alex Harui
Hi Lizhi, Please post a link to the entire console output from the compile. You can try to use paste.apache.org. Or pastebin.com or other similar service. Thanks, -Alex On 8/29/17, 10:10 PM, "lizhi" wrote: >hi alex harui.which file error? > > >Alex Harui-2 wrote >> Post a link to your console

Re: Kotlinjs has solved the circular dependency problem. Flexjs, do you have any plans?

2017-08-29 Thread lizhi
hi alex harui.which file error? Alex Harui-2 wrote > Post a link to your console output. That exception often happens when > there is no JS file for a class. There should be mention of which file in > the console output. > > -Alex > > On 8/28/17, 3:50 AM, "lizhi" < > sliz@ > > wrote: > >>g

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Greg Dove
The proposal does seem logical to me. I am happy to participate as a committer in whatever the result of this is, but the statement about the historical PMC membership in Flex is not true for me (and I prefer to remain as a committer for FlexJS, not a PMC member). I was also surprised not to see

[FlexJS] Finding (x,y) position

2017-08-29 Thread Peter Ent
Hi, While working on drag-and-drop, I've made an "interesting" discovery having to do with the HTML-side's x and y getter functions. Let's say you have a nesting of s: … … (this structure is similar to what is generated for DataGrid). If you attem

RE: Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
It is good to point this out. There are other targets that can be compiled into other than flash. Such as Air and it's captive runtimes for desktop and mobile. My understanding is Adobe has a vested interesting alternatives to the Flash Player as targets. They are not getting rid of ActionS

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi, +1 Well prepared abstract. It is definitely the time for making split. I hope that board will understand us and this will go smoothly. Looking forward to the voting. Thank you! Piotr 2017-08-29 16:29 GMT+02:00 Peter Ent : > Hi, > > As an employee of Adobe and a contributor to Apache FlexJ

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Peter Ent
Hi, As an employee of Adobe and a contributor to Apache FlexJS, I think this new project fork is a good idea. Companies with investment in Flex applications that rely on the Flash Player to deliver their applications to their users will have to look for alternatives in the next couple of years.

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi Alex, thanks for this summary, I think this is the right way to go! +1 But for me, it sounds a little bit, that Apache Flex is labeled as discontinued. We should take care to not scare off or unsettle Apache Flex users. Even if FlashPlayer is dead, Flex with AIR is still an awesome platform! Ma

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Olaf Krueger
I've already replied via nabble a few hours ago but it seems that it is not synced with the list for whatever reason... so sorry for annoying you: Hi Alex, thanks for this summary, I think this is the right way to go! +1 But for me, it sounds a little bit, that Apache Flex is labeled as disc

RE: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
+1 to Split to FlexJS -Mark K

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Tom Chiverton
I think this is a good idea. The projects and people who work on them are diverging, and have been for a while. Some people clearly wish to contribute to both - but I think for most people it's one or the other. I don't want to get into a big list of who has done what; that's my impression and

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, As a long standing Flex PMC and committer (5 1/2 years) with a large number of contributions in code [1] (and also elsewhere) I’d like to be added as a PMC and committer to this proposal. I’ve also made a number of contributions directly to FlexJS [2], reviewed releases, spoken at conferen

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Olaf Krüger
> "thanks" for the "degradation" Please don't start the new project with trouble! I hope that there are no doubts that Chris is an important part of the PMC. Thanks, Olaf

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread Christofer Dutz
"thanks" for the "degradation" -1 Chris On 2017-08-29 06:37, Alex Harui wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I (and many others on the PMC) believe there are sufficient reasons to ask > the Apache Board of Directors to create a new Apache Top-Level Project > called Apache FlexJS separate from Apache Flex.

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

2017-08-29 Thread m_awais
Alex, Thank you very much for your reply. It seems that problem was JAVA_HOME variable. After setting this variable installation completed successfully. Regards -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex-JS-Flex-SDK-Installer-always-get-stuck-a

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

2017-08-29 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
+1 for the fork. Thanks, Om On Aug 28, 2017 10:05 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > Very well said. > > Let’s do this! :-) > > Harbs > > > On Aug 29, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Alex Harui > wrote: > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I (and many others on the PMC) believe there are sufficient reasons to > ask > > the Apache