[RESULT][VOTE] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-22 Thread Olaf Krueger
Failed. Result: [0]: 4 votes [+1]: 2 votes So we leave anything as it is. Thanks for voting! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

RE: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-20 Thread Yishay Weiss
, January 19, 2019 8:42:42 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub +1 In 2018, 15 issues were created by using JIRA. So I don't expect too many duplicates for the future. If it is possible, we would set JIRA and the Conflucence Wiki read-only

Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-19 Thread Olaf Krueger
+1 In 2018, 15 issues were created by using JIRA. So I don't expect too many duplicates for the future. If it is possible, we would set JIRA and the Conflucence Wiki read-only. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-19 Thread Carlos Rovira
+1 El El vie, 18 ene 2019 a las 22:12, Tom Chiverton escribió: > Vote: -0 > > I don't see there is much benefit, and it creates two streams of bugs. If > it's > true that Jira will be closed to new bugs but otherwise stay open, my vote > changes to +0. > > > -- > Tom > Q. According to Intel the

Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-18 Thread Tom Chiverton
Vote: -0 I don't see there is much benefit, and it creates two streams of bugs. If it's true that Jira will be closed to new bugs but otherwise stay open, my vote changes to +0. -- Tom Q. According to Intel the Pentium conforms to I.E.E.E. stnd. 754 and 854 for floating point arithmetic. If

Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-18 Thread Piotr Zarzycki
Hi, +0, as long as we won't make JIRA and Confluence read only. Thanks, Piotr pt., 18 sty 2019 o 00:19 Justin Mclean napisał(a): > Hi, > > +0 I see little reason to change and split where you need to look at > things in two places. > > I assume that JIRA and Confluence will not be made read

Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +0 I see little reason to change and split where you need to look at things in two places. I assume that JIRA and Confluence will not be made read only? Thanks, Justin

[Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

2019-01-17 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, this is the official vote thread to approve the move from JIRA issues to GitHub issues and to move the Confluence Wiki to the Github Wiki. As discussed here [1], the idea is to don't migrate the JIRA issues to GitHub. Instead, we want a clean restart at GitHub issues. The JIRA issues

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-10 Thread Olaf Krueger
@Justin > i’m that sure that it is. JIRA has a number of significant benefits over > GitHub issues including better searching and querying. (Yes I use both). Just to make sure that I got it right: Does that mean that you basically support the idea of moving from JIRA to GitHub issues or

RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-09 Thread Kessler CTR Mark J
+1 Especially those old Adobe issues that were imported. To me they are mostly clutter because of the quantity, age, and missing attachments. I would much rather have a clean start. But brining in any new (from a given time range x number of months) wouldn't be a bonus, unless that's

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-09 Thread Carlos Rovira
.. > > We maybe could set or treat or freeze JIRA as read-only and could link to > the entire Flex-JIRA from GitHub in order to not losing the history. > If somebody is going to fix one of those existing JIRA issues we could > simply recreate it manually as a GitHub issue. > I

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
going to fix one of those existing JIRA issues we could simply recreate it manually as a GitHub issue. If somebody will file a new GitHub issue we may want to check if there's a JIRA duplicate in order to link it from the GitHub issue. But on the other hand, I don't believe when somebody creates a ne

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
> Do we know if it possible it import all historical JIRA issues ... I don't know it this is possible. > JIRA has a number of significant benefits over GitHub issues including > better searching and querying JIRA is probably more powerful but I guess the simplicity of GitHub is th

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I think it would be easier and more transparent for folks to handle future > development (if it will happen) by using GitHub. i’m that sure that it is. JIRA has a number of significant benefits over GitHub issues including better searching and querying. (Yes I use both). Do w

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Alex Harui
Are we going to say that we won't fix any of the bugs currently open in JIRA? That might be ok. It would help prioritize and make more clear what folks are still interested in. My concern is having two active bug bases. You may still end up referencing the JIRA bugs when marking new bugs as

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
I was thinking more like a cut of the old Wiki and JIRA than a migration of the existing stuff. I think it would be easier and more transparent for folks to handle future development (if it will happen) by using GitHub. We may migrate some wiki stuff someday, don't know. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Alex Harui
gt; I would like to create an INFRA Jira in order to ask them to enable GitHub > "Issues" and the "Wiki" for following repositories: > > - flex-tlf.git > - flex-utilities.git > - flex-flexunit.git > - flex-site.git >

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Carlos Rovira
create an INFRA Jira in order to ask them to enable GitHub > "Issues" and the "Wiki" for following repositories: > > - flex-tlf.git > - flex-utilities.git > - flex-flexunit.git > - flex-site.git > - flex-external.git > - flex-sdk.git > - flex-b

Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

2019-01-08 Thread Olaf Krueger
Hi, I would like to create an INFRA Jira in order to ask them to enable GitHub "Issues" and the "Wiki" for following repositories: - flex-tlf.git - flex-utilities.git - flex-flexunit.git - flex-site.git - flex-external.git - flex-sdk.git - flex-blazeds.git -

[FLEXJS][ROYALE] Github Issues replacing Apache JIRA

2017-09-29 Thread Alex Harui
Hi, It looks like GitHub Issues has been enabled on the new Royale repos. The Royale folks will no longer be watching Apache JIRA for issues related to FlexJS and Royale. Existing FlexJS JIRA issues will not be automatically migrated to GitHub Issues. If you have an open FlexJS issue in Apache

CSS compiler issues

2017-07-11 Thread Harbs
I just created a couple of JIRAs on compiler issues that have been bugging me for a while.[1][2] Neither of these are super-important, but it would be nice if it worked better. Harbs [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35340 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35340&

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-07 Thread Josh Tynjala
ould be possible too. > > > > - Josh > > > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <que...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Is anybody actually addressing the issues people have been reporting > > about > > > the instal

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-07 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
k > search, that should be possible too. > > - Josh > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <que...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Is anybody actually addressing the issues people have been reporting > about > > the installer and/or ANT script for F

Re: [FlexJS][VS Code] dual issues

2017-07-07 Thread Alex Harui
>Thanks, >Piotr > > > >- >Apache Flex PMC >piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >-- >View this message in context: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-development.247.n4.nabble.com%2FFlexJS-VS-Code-dual-issues-tp6

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-07 Thread Josh Tynjala
%40mail.gmail.com%3E I looked into MD5 with PowerShell, and from what I could tell from a quick search, that should be possible too. - Josh On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <que...@apache.org> wrote: > Is anybody actually addressing the issues people have been report

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-07 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
understands the unzip directive, but the > >other way complains that it doesn't know how to deal with a dmg file, so > >the ant script errors out. That one is an easy fix. > > > >-Nick > > > > > >On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-07 Thread Alex Harui
t; > >On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> >wrote: > >> Maybe I wasn't clear enough: >> >> I don't think the version of Ant will affect the SSL issues. The SSL >> issues should be solvable via the JCE upgrade: >> >> &

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-07 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
that it doesn't know how to deal with a dmg file, so the ant script errors out. That one is an easy fix. -Nick On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > Maybe I wasn't clear enough: > > I don't think the version of Ant will affect the SSL i

Re: [FlexJS][VS Code] dual issues

2017-07-07 Thread Harbs
gt; and other browser APIs here? I just want to be sure so that I test the >> right thing when I make changes. >> >> - Josh >> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Since updating to “dual”has been repor

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-07 Thread piotrz
.nabble.com/4-16-0-Install-issues-tp62855p62930.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS][VS Code] dual issues

2017-07-07 Thread piotrz
-issues-tp62894p62929.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-06 Thread Alex Harui
438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63635001583 >1422210=ps7%2Fd3pmBt%2FY2pFquS9vvO5Dj2rJ8EohmcV7hfgU9F8%3D= >0 > > > > >-- >View this message in context: >https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-fle >x-development.247.n4.nabble.

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-06 Thread Alex Harui
Maybe I wasn't clear enough: I don't think the version of Ant will affect the SSL issues. The SSL issues should be solvable via the JCE upgrade: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/38203971/javax-net-ssl-sslhandshakeexcep tion-received-fatal-alert-handshake-failure/38264878#38264878 I'm

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-06 Thread Olaf Krueger
f [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35315 -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/4-16-0-Install-issues-tp62855p62919.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-06 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
a recent version of Ant. > > Thanks, > -Alex > > On 7/5/17, 6:13 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <que...@apache.org> wrote: > > >Is anybody actually addressing the issues people have been reporting about > >the installer and/or ANT script for Flex SDK 4

Re: [FlexJS][VS Code] dual issues

2017-07-06 Thread Josh Tynjala
st to be clear, are you referring to DOM classes like >>HTMLButtonElement >> and other browser APIs here? I just want to be sure so that I test the >> right thing when I make changes. >> >> - Josh >> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Ha

Re: [FlexJS][VS Code] dual issues

2017-07-06 Thread Alex Harui
y JSFlex. >> >> > a. I’m not getting JS specific classes recognized. >> >> Just to be clear, are you referring to DOM classes like >>HTMLButtonElement >> and other browser APIs here? I just want to be sure so that I test the >> right thing when I make change

Re: [FlexJS][VS Code] dual issues

2017-07-06 Thread Josh Tynjala
sure so that I test the > right thing when I make changes. > > - Josh > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Since updating to “dual”has been reporting lots of errors. When I build, >> both the debug and release builds build co

Re: [FlexJS][VS Code] dual issues

2017-07-06 Thread Josh Tynjala
Since updating to “dual”has been reporting lots of errors. When I build, > both the debug and release builds build correctly, but the PROBLEMS window > and the live code hinting report lots of (non) issues. I’m not sure what > the source of the errors are, but here are the details

[FlexJS][VS Code] dual issues

2017-07-06 Thread Harbs
Since updating to “dual”has been reporting lots of errors. When I build, both the debug and release builds build correctly, but the PROBLEMS window and the live code hinting report lots of (non) issues. I’m not sure what the source of the errors are, but here are the details: I’ve tried a few

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-06 Thread piotrz
- Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/4-16-0-Install-issues-tp62855p62869.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-06 Thread Alex Harui
..@apache.org> wrote: >Is anybody actually addressing the issues people have been reporting about >the installer and/or ANT script for Flex SDK 4.16.0? > >Right now I see two major issues that are preventing even people who are >familiar with the SDK from doing installs : > > -

4.16.0 Install issues

2017-07-05 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
Is anybody actually addressing the issues people have been reporting about the installer and/or ANT script for Flex SDK 4.16.0? Right now I see two major issues that are preventing even people who are familiar with the SDK from doing installs : - In the installer, selecting AIR 25.0 gives users

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc Issues

2017-06-30 Thread Peter Ent
Ah, I misunderstood which asdoc-config file. On 6/30/17, 1:31 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >The asdoc target doesn't work because we've extended ActionScript for >FlexJS. We only care about the ASDoc Example. I guess we should comment >out the asdoc target for now. Also,

Re: [FLEXJS] ASDoc Issues

2017-06-30 Thread Alex Harui
The asdoc target doesn't work because we've extended ActionScript for FlexJS. We only care about the ASDoc Example. I guess we should comment out the asdoc target for now. Also, it looks like the ASDoc example uses its own asdic-config.xml file in its src/main/config folder. -Alex On 6/30/17,

[FLEXJS] ASDoc Issues

2017-06-30 Thread Peter Ent
I'm running the asdoc target in flex-asjs and it has rejected a couple of things in Core/main/flex/Promise.as such as: [asdoc] /Users/pent/dev/flex-asjs/frameworks/projects/Core/src/main/flex/Promise.as(270): col: 19 Error: Syntax error: expecting identifier before catch. [asdoc]

Re: [FlexJS] [Typedefs] [Maven] build issues

2017-06-07 Thread Christofer Dutz
The only 100% safe option in my opinion would be to create a tool to do the patching. This tool might simply be a wrapper around some open-source patch tool with a suitable license and provide a Maven goal to do the patching. For Ant a matching wrapper should make sure the patches are applied

AW: [FlexJS] [Typedefs] [Maven] build issues

2017-06-06 Thread Christofer Dutz
Nope … don’t have any issues on a Mac. I wouldn’t say that I am really happy with the patching and all, the way it’s done today. We are relying on an external executable. As you might have noticed, I don’t like executing Things outside the VM and like to have Things inside the Java world

[FlexJS] [Typedefs] [Maven] build issues

2017-06-06 Thread Greg Dove
I have had a few issues with maven build of typedefs (in develop) over recent times. I think others may have experienced this also, at least I have seen similar things mentioned previously. For me this seems to be related to patches being applied when the content that is being downloaded

Re: dual issues

2017-06-05 Thread Harbs
"lib" ], "external-library-path": [ "typedefs" ] }, "copySourcePathAssets": true, "additionalOptions": "-remove-circulars -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions -html-template=src/resources/m

Re: dual issues

2017-06-05 Thread Josh Tynjala
Are you setting debug in an argument passed to asconfigc, like this? asconfigc --debug=false Or is it specified in asconfig.json in the compilerOptions section? Both will work, but the asconfigc command line option will always override whatever is in asconfig.json. In VSCode, the generated

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Alex Harui
For me, the Ant build calls the "compile" target in examples/build_example.xml and sets the config_arg to use frameworks/js-config.xml which has targets set to just JS. A better example might be examples/flexjs/MDLExample. For Ant, it has a src/main/config/compile-app-config.xml which specifies:

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Harbs
That is using -js-output-type=FLEXJS My understanding is that we are supposed to use -targets=JSFlex now. Is that not right? > On Jun 4, 2017, at 5:43 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > The examples/native/ButtonExample does not produce a SWF for me, so maybe > compare that

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Alex Harui
The examples/native/ButtonExample does not produce a SWF for me, so maybe compare that setup against yours. HTH, -Alex On 6/4/17, 12:56 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >Good news: Prior to the switch to dual, I was not getting a minified >release build working. That’s now working.

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Harbs
I’m seeing similar times using both ant and asconfig for debug. (Both are good.) asconfig is not compiling a release build at all — even if I specify debug=false. I have not tried with Maven. > On Jun 4, 2017, at 12:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Justin

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Justin you are compiling by Maven ? Yep and Debug builds are noticeably slower for me. Justin

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Harbs
To be clear: Debug builds are as fast if not faster than they used to be. Release build are much slower. I’m getting a debug build (with remove circulars) of my (complex) app taking about 10 seconds. The release build takes about 3 minutes. > On Jun 4, 2017, at 11:57 AM, Justin Mclean

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread piotrz
As I remember Harbs is compiling it by ANT ? Am I right ? Justin you are compiling by Maven ? Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/dual-issues-tp61955p62070.html Sent from the Apache Flex

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Bad news: It takes much longer than it used to, and I’m getting a swf file > even though I’m only using -targets=JSFlex Compiles are also taking a lot longer for me and I’m also only using the JSFlex target. Thanks, Justin

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread piotrz
Ahh..That's not good. Another thing for resolve in release definitly. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/dual-issues-tp61955p62066.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Harbs
Good news: Prior to the switch to dual, I was not getting a minified release build working. That’s now working. Bad news: It takes much longer than it used to, and I’m getting a swf file even though I’m only using -targets=JSFlex Harbs

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Harbs
Objects like Promise, Map, Set etc. are available by default in pretty much all modern browsers. Things like await, arrow functions, let, etc. are being added by browsers all the time. I’m not sure exactly which ones have what right now, but they are pretty far along already, so that article

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Alex Harui
I thought es6 wasn't always on by default? https://thenextweb.com/dd/2016/03/09/6-reasons-need-learn-javascript-es6-no w-not-later/#.tnw_5KKUOOPX I haven't been paying attention so maybe all browsers are fully compliant now? -Alex On 6/4/17, 12:01 AM, "Harbs" wrote:

Re: dual issues

2017-06-04 Thread Harbs
Not sure what you mean here. > On Jun 4, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > Does FlexJS emit the right code to enable es6 APIs?

Re: dual issues

2017-06-03 Thread Alex Harui
On 6/3/17, 2:02 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >I just ran into another issue. > >I’m not sure why dual would have changed this, but I’m now getting an >(erroneous) error when trying to use Promises: > >Incorrect number of arguments. Expected no more than 0 > >

Re: dual issues

2017-06-03 Thread Harbs
{ ^ > On Jun 1, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My bad. I accidentally overwrote my copy of BasicJS.swc. > > After fixing some issues, I got my app to run using the latest dual changes. > > All in all, switching to du

Re: dual issues

2017-06-01 Thread Josh Tynjala
When they're defined in the *-config.xml files, they'll be picked up automatically without any special code in VSCode. However, now that you mention it, I need to allow app developers to customize these in asconfig.json too. - Josh On Jun 1, 2017 12:04 AM, "Alex Harui"

Re: dual issues

2017-06-01 Thread piotrz
Hi Harbs, Great news! This approach us to release! Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/dual-issues-tp61955p61988.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive

Re: dual issues

2017-06-01 Thread Harbs
My bad. I accidentally overwrote my copy of BasicJS.swc. After fixing some issues, I got my app to run using the latest dual changes. All in all, switching to dual went a lot better than I expected. Great work, Alex! I think the switch to the dual approach was the right one. There’s still

Re: dual issues

2017-06-01 Thread Alex Harui
Josh, there are new compiler options like js-external-library-path, js-library-path, swf-library-path, swf-external-library-path. Does your VSCode integration handle these? -Alex On 5/31/17, 8:42 PM, "Josh Tynjala" wrote: >As I understand it, the compiler should just

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Alex Harui
If targets only has JSFlex, there shouldn't be any SWF compile at all. The console should spit out what it thinks it needs to do. Keep in mind that there are now SWCs for SWFs and SWCs for JS. Prior to dual, there was a main SWC with SWF APIs that the compiler saw, and JS that it substituted in

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Josh Tynjala
As I understand it, the compiler should just take care of differences between JS and SWF, as long as your targets option is correct. VSCode shouldn't need to do anything​ special except to pass in the correct options. There's nothing related to dual changes on my to-do list at this time, but

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Harbs
Another weird issue: > /Users/harbs/Documents/git/PrintUI/printui-flexjs/PortedPrintUI/src/com/printui/dummy/view/Image.as(12): > col: 15 interface method imageElement in interface IImage not implemented by > class Image > > public class Image extends BinaryImage >^ >

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Harbs
Josh, VS Code is now reporting lots of errors in the Problems window. I’m guessing it does not know how to differentiate between JS and SWF builds using dual? Is that something on your to-do list? Thanks, Harbs > On Jun 1, 2017, at 5:10 AM, Harbs wrote: > > Bingo.

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Harbs
Bingo. Thanks! SWF output still gets all kinds of errors, but the JS output is pretty error free. I still have some fixing up to do before I can see how well it actually works, but at least the compiler is not complaining now. > On Jun 1, 2017, at 4:45 AM, Josh Tynjala

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Harbs
The examples I see seem to use COMPILE blocks. I’m not sure how this translates to the app level. Is there a way to define a single method which overrides a SWF one and implements a new JS one (without using COMPILE blocks)? That seems to me like a pretty common use case for migrated apps. >

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I’m using asconfig in VSCode to compile with these settings: > "config": "flex", > "compilerOptions": { > "debug": false, > "js-output-type": "flexjs", > "source-map": false, > "library-path": [ > "lib" > ], I’ve not used VSCode but perhaps try

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Josh Tynjala
Try replacing the js-output-type compiler option with: "targets": ["JSFlex"] - Josh On May 31, 2017 6:26 PM, "Harbs" wrote: > I’m using asconfig in VSCode to compile with these settings: > "config": "flex", > "compilerOptions": { > "debug": false, >

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Harbs
In case I wasn’t clear, I’m not outputting SWF — only JS output. > On Jun 1, 2017, at 4:26 AM, Harbs wrote: > > I’m using asconfig in VSCode to compile with these settings: > "config": "flex", > "compilerOptions": { > "debug": false, >

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Harbs
I’m using asconfig in VSCode to compile with these settings: "config": "flex", "compilerOptions": { "debug": false, "js-output-type": "flexjs", "source-map": false, "library-path": [ "lib" ], > On Jun 1, 2017, at 1:04 AM, Justin Mclean

Re: dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/31/17, 2:38 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >I just switched to dual and I’m getting lots of errors. These errors seem >to be exactly what I was afraid of, and I’m not sure how to resolve >without being restricted by naming of properties and methods. > >1. I’m using a mask

dual issues

2017-05-31 Thread Harbs
I just switched to dual and I’m getting lots of errors. These errors seem to be exactly what I was afraid of, and I’m not sure how to resolve without being restricted by naming of properties and methods. 1. I’m using a mask setter and getter for images it’s now giving override errors. 2.

Re: 4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-26 Thread Vincent Sotto
just add option to select mirror, rise and eu mirror did not work for me, but us did http://www-eu.apache.org/dist/flex/4.16.0/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.0-bin.zip http://mirror.rise.ph/apache/flex/4.16.0/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.0-bin.zip while this worked

Re: 4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-25 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/25/17, 9:19 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >I was referring to the idea where we stay with current installer as is and >popup with the message to the user if problems during download occurs. > >Message could contains link to the zip. I don't think the current installer

Re: 4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-25 Thread piotrz
-development.247.n4.nabble.com/4-16-0-Windows-Install-issues-was-Re-ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flex-4-16-0-released-tp60626p60768.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-25 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/25/17, 9:05 AM, "piotrz" wrote: >Alex, > >Can we exact specify if user face this problem ? Maybe we could do this >zip >file, and notify user by popup - Hey you have to download 64 bit >installer. > >In the other words zip file is best option for me. I'm not

Re: 4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-25 Thread piotrz
in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/4-16-0-Windows-Install-issues-was-Re-ANNOUNCE-Apache-Flex-4-16-0-released-tp60626p60766.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: 4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-21 Thread Alex Harui
Can you explain in more detail what steps you would take? Thanks, -Alex On 3/20/17, 1:30 PM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote: >We could do a patch release that does not add any new feature for the 64 >bit installer

Re: 4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-20 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
We could do a patch release that does not add any new feature for the 64 bit installer binary. We would need to bump up the version so that the auto update functionality would be triggered. In this we probably don't even need a source release as we will only be modifying the convenience

4.16.0 Windows Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-20 Thread Alex Harui
Renaming thread. On next post I will drop the [ANNOUNCE] tag so we don't fill the inboxes of those using an Announce filter. So, I have heard back from my internal contacts. There is no plan to allow the packaging of a 64-bit app the way we package the 32-bit Installer. Essentially, that means

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-16 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
You can use FP/AIR 23 and older then use one of the upgrade scripts. +1 for this approach. I think we should add these steps to a wiki page and keep it handy for folks who want this. In fact, simply copying over a different AIR SDK should work as well. Thanks, Om

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-16 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/16/17, 12:25 PM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote: >I think there is some reason to use very old versions of AIR ( < 4), but >between AIR 4 and 23 it should be ok. Do you know if it effects the old >ones (which still support some older OSs)? Probably. The

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-16 Thread Nicholas Kwiatkowski
I think there is some reason to use very old versions of AIR ( < 4), but between AIR 4 and 23 it should be ok. Do you know if it effects the old ones (which still support some older OSs)? -Nick On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Adding dev@... > > I just

4.16.0 Install issues (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex 4.16.0 released)

2017-03-16 Thread Alex Harui
Adding dev@... I just noticed that there is a bug in the installer.xml and the Installer will not install 4.16.0 on Mac with FP/AIR 23 and older. It will only work with FP/AIR 24 and newer. I haven't tried Windows, but it should be ok. I am hopeful very few people will want to install 4.16

Re: [FlexJS} CreateJS Externs (was Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues)

2017-03-15 Thread Alex Harui
On 3/14/17, 11:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> In order to determine which steps I had to go through to try to donate >>the >> CreateJS Externs to the CreateJS community, it turns out I had to get a >> ruling from the Adobe legal team about who owned the

Re: [FlexJS} CreateJS Externs (was Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues)

2017-03-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > In order to determine which steps I had to go through to try to donate the > CreateJS Externs to the CreateJS community, it turns out I had to get a > ruling from the Adobe legal team about who owned the "externs" files we > generate from CreateJS source. The Adobe legal team determined

Re: [FlexJS} CreateJS Externs (was Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues)

2017-03-15 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > In order to determine which steps I had to go through to try to donate the > CreateJS Externs to the CreateJS community, it turns out I had to get a > ruling from the Adobe legal team about who owned the "externs" files we > generate from CreateJS source. The Adobe legal team determined

[FlexJS} CreateJS Externs (was Re: Current FlexJS license/notice issues)

2017-03-14 Thread Alex Harui
Justin's fix for CreateJS typedefs on Unix reminded me... In order to determine which steps I had to go through to try to donate the CreateJS Externs to the CreateJS community, it turns out I had to get a ruling from the Adobe legal team about who owned the "externs" files we generate from

Re: [Flex JS] Font weight issues

2017-03-02 Thread Alex Harui
SimpleCSSStylesImpl is Simple. FontWeight is expecting bold or normal since that's what Flash supports for free and is less code. Hopefully someday someone will write AdvancedCSSStylesImpl. Thanks for pointing it out though, -Alex On 3/2/17, 9:45 PM, "Justin Mclean"

[Flex JS] Font weight issues

2017-03-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Just a FYI in case this trips anyone else up. The code in applyStyle in SimpleCSSValuesImpl assumes that most CSS style numbers are pixels - this is not be the case. The code in questions is: if (typeof(value) == 'number') { if (colorStyles[p]) value =

  1   2   3   4   5   >