Cyrill Zadra created FLEX-33456:
---
Summary: Spark Accordion
Key: FLEX-33456
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33456
Project: Apache Flex
Issue Type: New Feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cyrill Zadra updated FLEX-33456:
Description: Make Spark Accordion component in experimental project release
ready. (was: Make
Tinks components are now in experimental project.
Cyrill
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Cyrill Zadra cyrill.za...@gmail.com wrote:
just fyi.. I have my local experimental project updated with tink's
components. As soon I've a stable internet connection I'll clone the
git repository and push
Hi,
Tinks and experimental folder contain both a MenuBar component. How do we
proceed in this situation?
I just use the existing one unless there's a compelling reason to use Tinks.
Any idea how they compare?
Thanks,
Justin
No .. I haven't yet looked at it.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Tinks and experimental folder contain both a MenuBar component. How do we
proceed in this situation?
I just use the existing one unless there's a compelling reason to use
I guess it should be 2 first, then 1 if you want to move them to the spark
lib otherwize I guess, it's preferable to move them to the experimental lib
as we did with the Bogdan's components, btw, there's also a thread A
guideline for adding new components to the Apache Flex SDK? where we can
If I recall correctly, mobile components have destruction policy declared
by ViewNavigatorBase. However, I don't deny that a NavigatorContent with
creation/destruction policy is useful, but altering UIComponent (which is
already huge) is not the best option in my opinion.
All the best,
Bogdan
I think tink uses a similar approach as you mentioned bogdan,
.. just looking at his source code ;-)
Cyrill
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:52 PM, Bogdan DINU flex.programm...@gmail.com wrote:
If I recall correctly, mobile components have destruction policy declared
by ViewNavigatorBase. However, I
-
From: Cyrill Zadra
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 6:53 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spark Accordion
Hey
a while ago, I've looked over the Accordion from adobe.next branch,
having the same intention on my mind. What I found out is that they went
all the way down, modifying UIComponent
On 2/28/13 12:28 AM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 27, 2013 9:12 PM, Cyrill Zadra cyrill.za...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
I was looking for a Spark Accordion and found the one in tinks and
cframpton whiteboard (branch adobe.next). I moved all the relevant
classes from cframpon's
:12 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Spark Accordion
Hey
I was looking for a Spark Accordion and found the one in tinks and
cframpton whiteboard (branch adobe.next). I moved all the relevant
classes from cframpon's adobe.next branch to my develop branch and
after a couple of hours I had
/spark/
[2]
http://www.tink.ws/examples/**apache-flex/http://www.tink.ws/examples/apache-flex/
-Message d'origine- From: Cyrill Zadra
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 6:12 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Spark Accordion
Hey
I was looking for a Spark Accordion and found
Hey
a while ago, I've looked over the Accordion from adobe.next branch,
having the same intention on my mind. What I found out is that they went
all the way down, modifying UIComponent to add elementCreationPolicy and
elementDestructionPolicy to the NavigatorContent, in order to make the
On 2/28/13 9:53 PM, Cyrill Zadra cyrill.za...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey
a while ago, I've looked over the Accordion from adobe.next branch,
having the same intention on my mind. What I found out is that they went
all the way down, modifying UIComponent to add elementCreationPolicy and
14 matches
Mail list logo
