As the original author of the Spring ActionScript framework, I might be a
bit biased towards Swiz, but I don't think an IoC container belongs in the
core of the Flex framework. Swiz is just one of the IoC implementations out
there that most likely will not fit all scenarios in which you want to
The consensus wasn't to add Swiz to the flex SDK itself. The basis being
that it gave the impression of having a favorite, which we don't want to stifle
the choices people make. It was to add it in a GIT repo for storing. I
believe at this time it would have been added utilities repo.
Oh, Please do NOT merge it into the SDK, IOC is not the only way to void
boilerplate, and Swiz is not the only way to IOC!
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Eric eh.fx...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a shame. I agree the entire framework might be a bit much, but
IoC/Dependency Injection,
On boilerplate, I was referring to the ServiceHelper class default
fault handlers, not so much IoC. But if the general consensus is to not
bother with adding these things to the core SDK, so be it. I was hoping
it would make it in, just because Swiz is essentially defunct otherwise.
On
Hello,
Is Swiz still going to be merged into the standard SDK? Or has that
happened already?
-Eric
No. It was not merged.
I was in contact with chris (the author of swiz), and although he had the
intention to make the donation he was very busy to make it happen, so
things where left and nothing happens in the end.
2015-02-08 12:48 GMT+01:00 Jeffry Houser jef...@dot-com-it.com:
On 2/6/2015
On 2/6/2015 9:10 PM, Eric wrote:
Hello,
Is Swiz still going to be merged into the standard SDK? Or has that
happened already?
Has Swiz been donated? I thought there was talk of it at some point
in the past, but I thought it never happened.
To my knowledge Swiz has not been merged
That's a shame. I agree the entire framework might be a bit much, but
IoC/Dependency Injection, ServiceHelper and default fault handler
support (all optional features) really helped fill in some gaps and
avoid boilerplate.
On 2/8/2015 7:19 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
No. It was not merged.
I
Hi,
just wanted to know to what the current state of the
Swiz framework donation is [1]. @Carlos Rovira ... any
news from Chris Scott?
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/swiz-framework/XUMHxeIq_-4
--
Sebastian (PPMC)
Interaction Designer
Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex?
Hi Sebastian,
already I haven't news from Chris.
sorry.
2013/7/3 Sebastian Mohr flex.masul...@gmail.com
Hi,
just wanted to know to what the current state of the
Swiz framework donation is [1]. @Carlos Rovira ... any
news from Chris Scott?
[1]
Well ... this sounds like that they need a hug from us ;)
--
Sebastian (PPMC)
Interaction Designer
Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code:
http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Nick Collins ndcoll...@gmail.com
Hi,
Any news on this?
Thanks,
Justin
Hi Justin,
I send Chris some emails to ask him for action, but no response yet. I just
post in the swiz group mailing list some minutes ago since I don't know
what's happening. Maybe Chris is very busy? or maybe some email
communication problem? Really I don't know...
I'll continue pinging
Btw ... SourceMate 3.0 has Swiz Support [1] [2].
This should be pretty helpful for Flex Newbies ;)
[1] http://www.elementriver.com/blog/swiz-support-sourcemate-30
[2]
http://www.elementriver.com/sourcemate3/features/bean-autocomplete-content-assist
--
Sebastian (PPMC)
Interaction Designer
Yes, Chris needs get on our email list and put it in writing that he wants
to donate.
I think we need some proof of ownership. Does he own the code or some
corporation or business entity that he belongs to.
I think he will need to sign an ICLA.
-Alex
2013/6/6 Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com
Ugh. I have to watch a video? What am I looking for in that video?
hehe I only want to say that history is written in the internet so is easy
to prove that Chris Scott is the author, but I see that he must prove it
himself.
better wait for his email to
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Carlos Rovira
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com wrote:
hehe I only want to say that history is written in the internet so is easy
to prove that Chris Scott is the author, but I see that he must prove it
himself.
We could not in good conscience accept a donation
We could not in good conscience accept a donation without written, clear
intentions from the author. I suspect it will require a software grant and the
author will need to go through some legal paperwork to assent that he has
ownership of the code and is willing to donate it to the ASF.
I need
Thanks Mike,
I'll forward to Chris so he can chek it.
Best
Carlos
2013/6/6 Michael A. Labriola labri...@digitalprimates.net
We could not in good conscience accept a donation without written, clear
intentions from the author. I suspect it will require a software grant and
the author will
19 matches
Mail list logo
