Why do you wan't to split stuff between the doc in the repository and
the wiki. I for one would always be to lazy to check stuff in a wiki
when there is also a documentation. Plus, this would lead to
additional overhead in deciding what goes where and syncing between
the two places for
Hello, everyone,
I am ZHOU Yi, a student working in graph algorithm, especially graph
combinatorial algorithms. I am glad to join the Flink devlopping group.
I am working on Gelly graph library, hopping to devote improvements and
new features to Gelly graph library (algorithms library, graph
+1 for enforcing a more strict Java code style. However, let's not
introduce a line legth of 100 like in Scala. I think that's hurting
readability of the code.
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Ufuk Celebi u...@apache.org wrote:
On Saturday, March 14, 2015, Aljoscha Krettek aljos...@apache.org
+1 for not limiting the line length.
2015-03-16 14:39 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org:
+1 for not limiting the line length. Everyone should have a good sense to
break lines. When in exceptional cases people violate this, it is usually
for a good reason.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:18
+1 for the stricter Java code styles.
We should not forget about providing code formatter settings for Eclipse
and Intellij IDEA (as mentioned above).
That would help a lot.
(Of course if we'll use Google Code Style, they already provide such files
+1 for Max's suggestion.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ufuk Celebi u...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Maximilian Michels m...@apache.org
wrote:
Thanks for starting the discussion. We should definitely not keep
flink-expressions.
I'm in favor of DataTable for
Gyula Fora created FLINK-1706:
-
Summary: Add disk spilling to BarrierBuffer
Key: FLINK-1706
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1706
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
+1 for DataTable
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM Till Rohrmann trohrm...@apache.org wrote:
+1 for DataTable
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Márton Balassi balassi.mar...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 for Max's suggestion.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ufuk Celebi u...@apache.org wrote:
Robert Metzger created FLINK-1708:
-
Summary: KafkaSink not working from Usercode classloader
Key: FLINK-1708
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1708
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
Do we already enforce the official Scala style guide strictly?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Aljoscha Krettek aljos...@apache.org
wrote:
I'm already always sticking to the official Scala style guide, with the
exception of 100 line length.
On Mar 16, 2015 3:27 PM, Till Rohrmann
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-1709:
--
Summary: Add support for programs with higher-than-slot parallelism
Key: FLINK-1709
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1709
Project: Flink
Issue
It is really strange. It's right that the CliFrontend now resolves
localhost to the correct local address 10.218.100.122. Moreover, according
to the logs, the JobManager is also started and binds to akka.tcp://
flink@10.218.100.122:6123. According to the logs, this is also the address
the
I am also more in favor of Rel and Relation, but DataTable nicely follows
the terms DataSet and DataStream.
On Mar 16, 2015 4:58 PM, Aljoscha Krettek aljos...@apache.org wrote:
I like Relation or Rel, is shorter.
On Mar 16, 2015 4:52 PM, Hermann Gábor reckone...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for
I'm already always sticking to the official Scala style guide, with the
exception of 100 line length.
On Mar 16, 2015 3:27 PM, Till Rohrmann trohrm...@apache.org wrote:
+1 for stricter Java code styles. I haven't looked into the Google Code
Style but maybe we make it easier for new contributors
Could you please upload the logs? They would be really helpful.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Dulaj Viduranga vidura...@icloud.com
wrote:
Hi,
I tested the update but it’s still the same. I think it isn’t a problem
with my system because, I have an XAMPP server working totally fine (I
I have put my suggested version of an outline for the docs into the wiki.
Regardless where the docs end up (wiki or repository), we can use the wiki
to outline the docs.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Internals
Some pages contain some stub or outline, others are
I think the Wiki has a much lower barrier of entry to fix docs, especially
for external people. The docs, with the Jekyll setup, is rather tricky.
I would very much like that all kinds of people contribute to the docs
about the internals, not just the usual three suspects that have done this
so
There was an issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1634
Can we close it then?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Dulaj Viduranga vidura...@icloud.com
wrote:
Hay Stephan,
Great to know you could fix the issue. Thank you on the update.
Best regards.
On Mar 14, 2015, at
Popping up this thread. The PR build passes and we need some sort of
strategy (add suffix to packages or force manual build for 2.11) before we
merge.
2015-03-11 19:15 GMT+01:00 Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org:
Thank you for opening the pull request. It looks great so far.
There came up
19 matches
Mail list logo
