Hi Till,
That's correct, It is not necessary to include Apache 2.0-licensed projects
in the LICENSE file, unless they contain non-Apache 2.0-licensed code. We
should definitely remove those entries from the LICENSE file.
Best,
Max
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
Sorry, it was already out. I was merely struggling with the Maven deploy
command because tools/generate_specific_pom.sh is not entirely compatible
with old versions of Perl or sed. The script was generating incorrect
pom.xml files..
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Aljoscha Krettek
Hi Ronny,
I accepted your previous mail to the mailing list, you got two replies:
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Apache-Flink-0-9-ALS-API-td6424.html
Sorry for the confusion.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Ronny Bräunlich r.braeunl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
Dear Flink community,
Here's the second release candidate for the 0.9.0 release. We haven't had a
formal vote on the previous release candidate but it received an implicit
-1 because of a couple of issues.
Thanks to the hard-working Flink devs these issues should be solved now.
The following
Hi Henry,
This is just a dry run. The goal is to get everything in shape for a proper
vote.
Kind regards,
Max
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Max,
Are you doing official VOTE on the RC on 0.9 release or this is just a dry
run?
- Henry
